Merged: |0fficial| Trade Deadline (5 Viewers)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
KeepOnRollin said:
I wasn't attempting to imply anything. In fact, in my response to someone else I was more along your lines that 3 picks is plenty (if they are good) 4 isn't better necessarily. We are in agreement. As I said, maybe you read into it. Which if so then I am sorry.
Click to expand...

All right, maybe I misunderstood your point. I was under the impression that you felt Portland's three picks (only one of which is "good") was sufficient for Butler, but if that isn't what you were saying, I apologize for misreading you.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
Click to expand...


" they did their bigger deal already"

giphy.gif
 
Minstrel said:
All right, maybe I misunderstood your point. I was under the impression that you felt Portland's three picks (only one of which is "good") was sufficient for Butler, but if that isn't what you were saying, I apologize for misreading you.
Click to expand...
I think it is POSSIBLE that is is enough (with a package of players that might interest them as well of course) but it is likely more of an off-season possibility then in-season as in then they know exactly where those picks fall.
 
Interesting that there is Zero talk about Carmelo, either trade market for him is dead or Teams being super tight lipped about talks.
 
That basically tells me Neil would never trade for PG even if a deal was available. No way PG re-signs here.
 
We did our bigger deal already? I'm getting sick of Olshey.

All talk, no action. You got 30 minutes to prove me wrong.
 
Boob-No-More said:
Ah, modern times... I remember back in the days before cell phones and twitter, plays actually shot at shoot arounds...

BNM
Click to expand...

They should change the name of these "practice" sessions from shoot arounds to sit arounds.

BNM
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)
Back
Top