MickZagger
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 37,497
- Likes
- 16,468
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are awesome!
That second one is terrible. Those shoes are drawn so poorly. The "H" on the chest is a joke. Shadows on the thorax and abdomen, but nowhere else? Heck, every single individual component is poorly designed - the lines are all awful.
The original Hornet was pretty bad - but they should have just reused it, because it's way better than this new one.
They did a GREAT job! I only hope we can make the same great decisions when we change our Logo/Court/Uniforms.
Meh, people have been designing logos exactly like this for 20 years. It's boring and completely interchangeable.
That second hornet sure is proud of his boner.
First team I thought of was OKC. But yeah, Mavs, Nets, Kings and even the Pels have shield-like logos. I find them quite boring. But at least they don't commit aesthetic crimes like that 2nd Hornet logo...or the Wizards logo.I don't hate the first one (I hadn't seen the second one) but it seems like the Mavs or Nets or any number of other, vaguely shield-like logos that seems to use the same approach to line weights and color contrast.
Original from 1989
![]()
New
![]()
LOL The first one looks constipated, the second quite relieved after passing that ball out his ass. I feel bad for the fans.That 1989 Hornets logo is the best logo in NBA history!
