Michael Jordan unveils Hornets new logo

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

MickZagger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
37,497
Likes
16,468
Points
113
CHlogo1222213.jpg


HUGO122213.jpg


http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nba-b...eils-hornets-logos-mascot-181242202--nba.html
 
There's something kinda perverted about that second one... Or am I just sick minded?
 
That second one is terrible. Those shoes are drawn so poorly. The "H" on the chest is a joke. Shadows on the thorax and abdomen, but nowhere else? Heck, every single individual component is poorly designed - the lines are all awful.
The original Hornet was pretty bad - but they should have just reused it, because it's way better than this new one.
 
That second one is terrible. Those shoes are drawn so poorly. The "H" on the chest is a joke. Shadows on the thorax and abdomen, but nowhere else? Heck, every single individual component is poorly designed - the lines are all awful.
The original Hornet was pretty bad - but they should have just reused it, because it's way better than this new one.

Everything is terrible to you. Negative Nancy. You're gonna have a shit fit once ours are redesigned.
 
I love the first one. The second: Umm, no.
 
I think it looks bad. Especially the second one--has this stoner rape-y kind of vibe to it, mixed in with a little retarded child. Ick. First one is less obnoxious.

Meh, people have been designing logos exactly like this for 20 years. It's boring and completely interchangeable. If it were me, I'd tell the design to simplify the first version to focus on the wings and stinger and make it much less detailed. Turn it from a cartoon into an icon.
 
Meh, people have been designing logos exactly like this for 20 years. It's boring and completely interchangeable.

I think that's the first thing that jumped out at me... I don't hate the first one (I hadn't seen the second one) but it seems like the Mavs or Nets or any number of other, vaguely shield-like logos that seems to use the same approach to line weights and color contrast.

It seems likely that the NBA has some uber-brand guidelines that nudge all of the new logos in this direction. It makes it easier to plug them in and use them, I guess, but it reduces the variety and the uniqueness of each team.

Ed O.
 
Second one looks like he's about to take the Cleveland Browns to the Super Bowl
 
I like the angry first one the second one is terrible.
 
I do like how Hugo is wearing Air Jordan 11s!
 
1st isn't bad. 2nd one is...uh.....not good to say the least.
 
I don't hate the first one (I hadn't seen the second one) but it seems like the Mavs or Nets or any number of other, vaguely shield-like logos that seems to use the same approach to line weights and color contrast.
First team I thought of was OKC. But yeah, Mavs, Nets, Kings and even the Pels have shield-like logos. I find them quite boring. But at least they don't commit aesthetic crimes like that 2nd Hornet logo...or the Wizards logo.
Going through all 30 teams I'm actually surprised at how many decent designs there are. It's good that the 90s aesthetic has mostly been purged from the league. Hopefully the Wolves, Wiz and Cavs launch a redesign soon. Magic, Jazz, Kings, Raps, and Nugs could use one too. I think PHI and GSW have had the most successful recent redesigns. Brooklyn was just lazy.
 
On second thought, he looks quite happy to be crapping out a basketball.
 
That 1989 Hornets logo is the best logo in NBA history!
LOL The first one looks constipated, the second quite relieved after passing that ball out his ass. I feel bad for the fans.
 
I don't care, 2nd one is better.....HE'S ROCKING JORDANS!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top