calvin natt
Confeve
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2017
- Messages
- 7,520
- Likes
- 10,460
- Points
- 113
if Layman can’t get time on this team then he is a bad nba player. That is all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you spend even just one quarter watching Harkless you can tell his hearts just not in it. Especially on the offensive end. Check out his reaction to Dames game winner against the Lakers. He literally looks disappointed it went in. He’s been pouty before and I get the feeling he thinks more of himself then he should.
That's one way to interpret it. You could also say that he stays even keeled at all times. Which is true.
Assumptions about someone's thought process are just that, assumptions.
If you spend even just one quarter watching Harkless you can tell his hearts just not in it. Especially on the offensive end. Check out his reaction to Dames game winner against the Lakers. He literally looks disappointed it went in. He’s been pouty before and I get the feeling he thinks more of himself then he should.
But that's the exact problem. He should be trying to PROVE that he's better than the guys he might've been traded for. He should be trying to PROVE that we would've made a mistake if we traded him. He should be playing with a chip on his shoulder. But he doesn't. He doesn't hustle anymore, and he plays with no tenacity. He doesn't have his mind in it and doesn't care, and it's so obvious in his play. That's why I've gotten pissed at him lately. He's peaked (at least in Portland).To be fair, he's always been like that. The thought has crossed my mind that he's over Portland, I mean we did only try and replace him all summer, but I wouldn't read too much into this.
What a silly statement.if Layman can’t get time on this team then he is a bad nba player. That is all.
But that's the exact problem. He should be trying to PROVE that he's better than the guys he might've been traded for. He should be trying to PROVE that we would've made a mistake if we traded him. He should be playing with a chip on his shoulder. But he doesn't. He doesn't hustle anymore, and he plays with no tenacity. He doesn't have his mind in it and doesn't care, and it's so obvious in his play. That's why I've gotten pissed at him lately. He's peaked (at least in Portland).
New York wanted him. We should be trying to snatch Courtney Lee for him. Maybe get a right to swap 1sts with NYK (might have to include Napier, but that would open up a main roster spot for Wade Baldwin).
Since Harkless was a target for the Knicks, I'd propose:Knicks are playing well but I think they'd be open to a Lee-Harkless swap. So would I. So should everyone else.
What a silly statement.
Why get rid of Mo? Guys a great 7th or 8th guy like we've thought since we acquired him. He's done as expected. And he's cheap and young. If you thought he was more than that, thats on you.
Really?He's a starter, what are you talking about?
Really?
Etwann Moore......Paul Zipser....... I mean just because you DO start don't mean you SHOULD. I've said in the past before we traded for Nurk, we have two stars and a bunch of roll players. A bunch of 6th-9th guys. Thus my prediction again this season for 40 wins.
Oh. He was talking about Aminu. I had forgotten about himAminu has always played much better as a stretch 4 than a true SF. He is not an upgrade over Harkless last year. Over Harkless this year? Possibly. But not enough of one to get us out of 1 and done imo.
Aminu ideally should come off the bench so he can play either SF or PF behind both our starters imo.

I said earlier a couple times he is a quality role player. The type of player kinda good a a bunch of stuff, but not great in any. the kinda guy any team would want as their 6th-9th player.So you agree he shouldn't be starting, ok cool.
At this point I say start Layman when Aminu returnsHarkless is useless. Gettin really frustrated with his game. He's not even trying to shoot anymore. We need to upgrade his position asap.
At this point I say start Layman when Aminu returns
At this point I say start Layman when Aminu returns
I agree this is about a .500 ball club anyway I’m sure Layman wouldn’t hurt it that much
Hows the fishing? Tell me good stuff.
You also said we only had one starting quality player going into the 2015-16 season. But we'll go ahead and take all your preseason player evaluations as gospel...Really?
Etwann Moore......Paul Zipser....... I mean just because you DO start don't mean you SHOULD. I've said in the past before we traded for Nurk, we have two stars and a bunch of roll players. A bunch of 6th-9th guys. Thus my prediction again this season for 40 wins.
When Aminu returns he should start at SF with Vonleh at PF. Harkless to the bench until he shows he deserves more time. If he continues to play like shit give Layman rotation minutes.
Trolling is a fishing term.
I don't like the lack of shooting there, but I get the idea.
Like it's any different with Harkless lol


Yes but we're trying to improve on that!
Aminu + Vonleh + Nurkic = No points scored... by either front line!
Layman is a defensive liability, but you can hide him because you have Aminu and Nurkic and Dame on the floor too.
I actually don't think layman is a liability defensively. He's always shown well in that department imo. It's his shot that's broken, but at least he's not afraid to pull the trigger. If he ever found consistency with it he'd be at the minimum, a rotation player.
Hows the fishing? Tell me good stuff.
Ok I get what u meant the other poster explained..
How is this trolling?

