Rumor Moe Harklesss Part of Trade With Knicks !!!!! (2 Viewers)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Talks between New York and Portland are believed to be in the early stages, but at least one scenario discussed involved an additional player from Portland being sent in a trade, according to sources. Portland's Moe Harkless is one player who was discussed in a possible trade scenario, sources told ESPN.

Where's the assumption?
 
I'll loathe Neil with the force of 1000 suns if he gives up any first-rounder for KOQ.
 
Scalma said:
Talks between New York and Portland are believed to be in the early stages, but at least one scenario discussed involved an additional player from Portland being sent in a trade, according to sources. Portland's Moe Harkless is one player who was discussed in a possible trade scenario, sources told ESPN.

Where's the assumption?
Click to expand...
The assumption is from the source. Who read the sn article.

You understand that Quick and Canzano have been used as sources......right?
 
Hi, I'm new here and don't know about the No Personal Insult Rule. SlyPokerDog is dumbass lonely old dog.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nowhere in the report did it say Harkless COULD be a name being discussed. What it said was Harkless IS a name that is/was being discussed. That's not an assumption. Only assumptions being made here are by you mediocre man.
 
Vraiders said:
I was the one that posted it and i dont have a low paying job u dumbass its reported on espn, why would espn lie about shit like this get your facts straight you dumbass lonely old man.
Click to expand...
LOL attacking posters is a bad boy.

I was referring to his barrage of insults, not the original post.
 
giphy.gif
 
Mediocre Man said:
LOL attacking posters is a bad boy.

I was referring to his barrage of insults, not the original post.
Click to expand...

Lolol "barrage of insults."

I said one semi/sort of insult. Hope you're ok.
 
Teams were interested in Harkless at the deadline, but Neil didn't bite. Not surprising that teams are still interested in him.
 
Mediocre Man said:
All I did was mske a statement about a post. Then all hell broke loose
Click to expand...
Really? Well I can't argue the way you see it. But the way I see it is you did what you usually do. Came in here with your smug attitude implying that the OP was wrong for calling it a rumor because it is actually just an assumption. Waiting for someone to take acception to your statement before playing victim and hypocritically insulting them back while acting like you've done nothing wrong.
 
Last edited:
Fonzthecpt1 said:
Really? Well I can't argue the way you see it. But the way I see it is you did what you usually do. Came in here with your smug attitude implying that the OP was wrong for calling it a rumor because it is actually just an assumption. Waiting for someone to take acception to your statement before playing victim and hypocritically insulting them back while acting like you've done nothing wrong.
Click to expand...
The whole playing victim crap some of you do is great. I made a statement. Call thw statement whatever you want. The forums asinine rules about no personal attacks weren't put in by me. I actually hate them, but I was suspended fir doing it a while back, so IMO, everyone should have to follow the same rules.

Also, if you'll read back, I never personally attacked anyone

Dare I say you assumed I did?
 
Mediocre Man said:
The whole playing victim crap some of you do is great. I made a statement. Call thw statement whatever you want. The forums asinine rules about no personal attacks weren't put in by me. I actually hate them, but I was suspended fir doing it a while back, so IMO, everyone should have to follow the same rules.

Also, if you'll read back, I never personally attacked anyone

Dare I say you assumed I did?
Click to expand...
Well nobody can help you if you are so out of touch with your actions that you don't even realize when you've crossed the line.

But when you put negative connotations behind something which would otherwise not necessarily be perceived as negative and then claim that someone's actions are a result of their involvement in said 'negative' situation then it is essentially like insulting that person.

It's a very backhanded way of insulting someone, so much so that I have a hard time believing that you didn't know exactly what you were doing.
 
Fonzthecpt1 said:
Well nobody can help you if you are so out of touch with your actions that you don't even realize when you've crossed the line.

But when you put negative connotations behind something which would otherwise not necessarily be perceived as negative and then claim that someone's actions are a result of their involvement in said 'negative' situation then it is essentially like insulting that person.

It's a very backhanded way of insulting someone, so much so that I have a hard time believing that you didn't know exactly what you were doing.
Click to expand...
I know exactly what I am doing. I'm not personally insulting anyone. I'm insulting people like certain people, I'm insulting peoples posts, and I'm trolling cause I'm bored and on a bad mix of meds. None if those things are against the rules.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

BigGameDamian
Notice Moe Harkless Fighting For A Spot In Blazers’ Rotation - Again
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
andalusian
andalusian
Rastapopoulos
Kanter again
Replies
14
Views
1K
Sinobas
Sinobas
dviss1
Blazers Denied Pistons Permission to Interview Terry Stotts
2 3
Replies
82
Views
4K
blue9
blue9
santeesioux
Failton for Steve Blake?
2 3
Replies
80
Views
5K
Nikolokolus
Nikolokolus
UKRAINEFAN
More statistical analysis of our offense by Willy Raedy
Replies
2
Views
391
Minstrel
Minstrel

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Back
Top