Moving up for Clingan?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

I see him as a younger, taller, slower, white Allen Iverson without the same skills and playing a different position.

barfo
Another difference: he can step over Tyronn Lue without Lue falling over.
 
This would be such a blazer move to make. Last year best play on team was a PG so they draft another PG. This year the best player is a 25 year old Center so lets draft another center. Why would we ever draft a player who fills a need when we can continue to take and take up a bench player.
 
I see him as a younger, taller, slower, white Allen Iverson without the same skills and playing a different position.

barfo

Potentially, also playing a different game. Hockey is nice, I heard.
 
Remember when Olshey moved up to 10 for Collins?.....sorry to ruin your day .

Kinda reminds me of that trade. There was some decent starters picked after that in that year.
Didn't ruin it at all, it WAs A great trade. #15 and #20 didn't last long in the league, and Zach became a starter. Had he not gotten injured, it would have been a spectacular trade.
 
Didn't ruin it at all, it WAs A great trade. #15 and #20 didn't last long in the league, and Zach became a starter. Had he not gotten injured, it would have been a spectacular trade.

c'mon now. Zach's injuries haven't made him less of a player. He's a marginal starter, at best, healthy or not, then or now

and it doesn't matter a damn bit who was taken at 15 & 20. What matters is who was available. At 10, Portland could have drafted Donovan Mitchell or Bam Adebayo and then drafted Josh Hart or Derrick White

if they would have stayed at 15 & 20, the Blazers could have come out of that draft with OG Anunoby, Jarrett Allen, and either Derrick White or Josh Hart.

so then, Adebayo + Hart; or OG + Allen + White

but...the Blazers got Zach + Caleb Swanigan. Portland strapped on the dunce hat and danced an idiot shuffle that draft
 
Didn't ruin it at all, it WAs A great trade. #15 and #20 didn't last long in the league, and Zach became a starter. Had he not gotten injured, it would have been a spectacular trade.

Plus, Donovan Mitchell was still on the board. He was my pick over Zach.
 
The pick should have been Bam. While Mitchell looked good, the meltdowns this place would have had with Dame and cj on the team would have been legendary.

Mitchell is 6'3. Just say no to small guard lineups. Please. For the love of God.
 
It’s pretty wild; in 1984, 1994, 2004, and maybe 2014,
what a great idea...draft a 7'3 C because of his rebounding and rim-protection and immediately start training him to get comfortable 25' from the hoop

Well, the rebounding and rim protection are primarily on the other side of the court, so him running to the 3pt line and back means he's actually lowering his mileage and can play better longer.

Or something I'm really high.
 
I went back to look at some game film on Clingan...
For the life of me - I don't see how he is getting compared to Gobert.

From the Butler game this year.

+ Getting stuffed by the rim: https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxSim9e9JFKcA_M8NjX4JzXtNpk7RdFtdZ?feature=shared
+ Poor P&R Defense: https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxGiYr0fLYTTNjA4cJEvF0c-5Z2naQWqJG?feature=shared
+ Terrible Closeout: https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxt_tllGf_Aq6TKGt3yqAxukphWCIRCIpV?feature=shared
+ Chasing a block instead of boxing out: https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxSjra9LabbUkHKG2LM59Por3pwHilm5NN?feature=shared
+ Poor P&R Defense (again): https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxFiNltc2g006nKFGqB4tGQvNWyRjff2Ui?feature=shared

In fairness, this was only 1 game. He had 2 or 3 really nice passes, and some other good plays (but no 'great' plays). He also had several other blunders that I didn't clip out.

At no time while watching his game, do I say to myself... "Now THERE is an NBA talent". He's not athletic. Doesn't have particularly good hands. Sets marginal screens.
Honestly, I don't think I'd even take him at #14 in this draft. Yet, there are some calling him a top 5 pick? What am I missing???
 
what a great idea...draft a 7'3 C because of his rebounding and rim-protection and immediately start training him to get comfortable 25' from the hoop
C can get back on D sooner if shooting threes from the top of the key
 
I'd rather draft one of these guys:

180626121052-star-trek-worf-01.jpg


Great defender. Just park him under the basket and have him shouting, "Today is a good day to die."
Yes! I was thinking “Klingon” would be a good nickname.
 
The pick should have been Bam. While Mitchell looked good, the meltdowns this place would have had with Dame and cj on the team would have been legendary.

Mitchell is 6'3. Just say no to small guard lineups. Please. For the love of God.

No doubt, 3 time all-star Bam would have been a good pick.

But 5 time all-star Mitchell would have been an upgrade to CJ. And made CJ trade bait.
 
No doubt, 3 time all-star Bam would have been a good pick.

But 5 time all-star Mitchell would have been an upgrade to CJ. And made CJ trade bait.

I wonder if anyone likes playing with Mitchell? I have my doubts that they do.
But he is good.
 
At no time while watching his game, do I say to myself... "Now THERE is an NBA talent". He's not athletic. Doesn't have particularly good hands. Sets marginal screens.
Honestly, I don't think I'd even take him at #14 in this draft. Yet, there are some calling him a top 5 pick? What am I missing???
You haven't looked at the games of all the other losers.
 
I went back to look at some game film on Clingan...
For the life of me - I don't see how he is getting compared to Gobert.

From the Butler game this year.

+ Getting stuffed by the rim: https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxSim9e9JFKcA_M8NjX4JzXtNpk7RdFtdZ?feature=shared
+ Poor P&R Defense: https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxGiYr0fLYTTNjA4cJEvF0c-5Z2naQWqJG?feature=shared
+ Terrible Closeout: https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxt_tllGf_Aq6TKGt3yqAxukphWCIRCIpV?feature=shared
+ Chasing a block instead of boxing out: https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxSjra9LabbUkHKG2LM59Por3pwHilm5NN?feature=shared
+ Poor P&R Defense (again): https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxFiNltc2g006nKFGqB4tGQvNWyRjff2Ui?feature=shared

In fairness, this was only 1 game. He had 2 or 3 really nice passes, and some other good plays (but no 'great' plays). He also had several other blunders that I didn't clip out.

At no time while watching his game, do I say to myself... "Now THERE is an NBA talent". He's not athletic. Doesn't have particularly good hands. Sets marginal screens.
Honestly, I don't think I'd even take him at #14 in this draft. Yet, there are some calling him a top 5 pick? What am I missing???

I was not impressed with him either by the "eye test", but that can be deceiving. He just doesn't really look any more athletic to me than Edey, but with Edey, we know we're getting a great post player.
 
Can we stop with the Brook Lopez stuff! Clingan can’t even hit free throws at this point. He has no touch. Lopez has always shown touch.

Stop the madness!
To be fair Brook didn’t even try a 3 point shot until he was in the league a few years. Also his FT shooting wasn’t stellar between 60-70% about.
Another thing Brook got was MIP his second year meaning he improved greatly and that was from 21-22 years old.
Seems like Clingan’s best comp is indeed Brook Lopez if you are being positive. Downgrading that might be more realistic but not necessarily the best comparison.
 
The pick should have been Bam. While Mitchell looked good, the meltdowns this place would have had with Dame and cj on the team would have been legendary.

Mitchell is 6'3. Just say no to small guard lineups. Please. For the love of God.
Bam had a great workout with the Blazers.
 
what a great idea...draft a 7'3 C because of his rebounding and rim-protection and immediately start training him to get comfortable 25' from the hoop
That is part of the game now. You already know this. Exactly what point are you trying to make here. Every big that can shoot a three is used this way. Any big that cannot will not see the court in a bunch of situations and will eventually have to work on becoming a three point shooter. Pretty much Gobert who does have his value but obviously can’t stay on the court.
 
The biggest thing that sets Jokic aside is not three point shooting. It’s his court vision and passing. You leave him open he will destroy you from three but if you cover him he picks you apart passing the ball.
You can’t compare Jokic with Clingan on any level. At least not at this point.
 
I went back to look at some game film on Clingan...
For the life of me - I don't see how he is getting compared to Gobert.

From the Butler game this year.

+ Getting stuffed by the rim: https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxSim9e9JFKcA_M8NjX4JzXtNpk7RdFtdZ?feature=shared
+ Poor P&R Defense: https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxGiYr0fLYTTNjA4cJEvF0c-5Z2naQWqJG?feature=shared
+ Terrible Closeout: https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxt_tllGf_Aq6TKGt3yqAxukphWCIRCIpV?feature=shared
+ Chasing a block instead of boxing out: https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxSjra9LabbUkHKG2LM59Por3pwHilm5NN?feature=shared
+ Poor P&R Defense (again): https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxFiNltc2g006nKFGqB4tGQvNWyRjff2Ui?feature=shared

In fairness, this was only 1 game. He had 2 or 3 really nice passes, and some other good plays (but no 'great' plays). He also had several other blunders that I didn't clip out.

At no time while watching his game, do I say to myself... "Now THERE is an NBA talent". He's not athletic. Doesn't have particularly good hands. Sets marginal screens.
Honestly, I don't think I'd even take him at #14 in this draft. Yet, there are some calling him a top 5 pick? What am I missing???
That this draft pretty much sucks?
 
I was not impressed with him either by the "eye test", but that can be deceiving. He just doesn't really look any more athletic to me than Edey, but with Edey, we know we're getting a great post player.
Hey, I love me some good ol' fashioned post play, too. That's why Boban-the-unstoppable gets all the minutes.
 
That is part of the game now. You already know this. Exactly what point are you trying to make here. Every big that can shoot a three is used this way. Any big that cannot will not see the court in a bunch of situations and will eventually have to work on becoming a three point shooter. Pretty much Gobert who does have his value but obviously can’t stay on the court.
Gobert weakness in the playoffs has actually been more on defense than offense - when he gets isolated on smaller players they get wide open 3s. It's not a problem in the regular season but it really makes me question his postseason value especially when he takes up a huge chunk of the salary cap.

Clingan certainly has these weaknesses regardless of how much of his potential he realizes. The mobile big that can switch into guards just brings a whole different advantage to a defense.
 
C can get back on D sooner if shooting threes from the top of the key

oh for fucks sake...enough of this bullshit

that's a theory; and taking theory into wild idiot fantasy is useless yapping about a slow, plodding 7'3 player who shot 9 three's from the college 3 point line in 2 years, only making 2 of them at the same time he shot less than 56% on 226 FT's

how the fuck did 3 point shooting potential even become a possible virtue of Clingan? I keep seeing a comparison to Lopez. Here's a fact: over his first 8 seasons in the NBA Lopez only shot a total of 31 three's; he made 3 of 31. He didn't start shooting three's until his 9th season when he was 28. In his first 8 seasons, when he wasn't shooting three's, he averaged about 3 offensive rebounds a game. Over the next 4 seasons as a three point shooter, he averaged less than 1 offensive rebound. And he shot around 34.3% on three's when the NBA average was around 36%
 
Back
Top