illmatic99
formerly yuyuza1
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 57,752
- Likes
- 56,270
- Points
- 113
I hope so.I would be surprised if Brogdon kept his minutes at this level. Clearly, we were showcasing him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope so.I would be surprised if Brogdon kept his minutes at this level. Clearly, we were showcasing him.
Yes, I understand that that excuse can be trotted out any time a GM doesn't make a trade or sign a free agent. It doesn't work for sales people who don't make their quotas, and it doesn't work here. It is his job to find the right tango partner.
But... I though I fixed that typo/autocorrect. lol
If a rookie/sophomore Dame had this Brogdon as his mentor as opposed to Earl Watson or Mo Williams, would he be better than the player he ultimately became? Because that’s what most of the “keep Brogdon” camp would have me believe—that only guys who can take minutes in the rotation can be good mentors. Again, not sure why Brogdon is a better mentor than, say, a multiple time AS like Lowry.Scoot started earlier, he wasn't ready. It's pointless to throw him into the fire, watch him suck and then trade away anyone who might be a good role model and who allows him to come off the bench in a reduced role, as opposed to destroying his confidence. It's silly to assume the minute distribution will be the same throughout the entire year, especially once we've officially been eliminated. I disagree his value will only get lower. Scoot's once again questionable tonight with a left foot contusion. Trading away the other true point guard leaves you with what exactly? Simons? For all these reasons I'm okay with keeping him.
Very trueEvery single person on here said the same thing about Camara.
I like you, so I'm going to let that go.He has made many moves in his short tenure.
To not make a move at one deadline and be considered not belonging in the position is super cutthroat.
Sure am glad you aren't my employer.![]()
I like you, so I'm going to let that go.

How do you "Heavily Protect" a second round pick?
People can always excuse kicking the can down the road with this. Joe's been excused with "there's nothing he can do" way too much, especially since "he's just cleaning up Olsheys mess" doesn't apply anymore.This question drives me nuts. It's the most preposterous defense for Joe's blatant inactivity during his tenure. None of us are in NBA front offices so we obviously don't know but what we do know is that Joe made moves that looked like a rebuild when he said he was trying to build a contender around Dame and now he's holding onto players who could help teams contend when he's telling us we're rebuilding. Give me a fucking break with the "what moves do you know he could have made" because I don't know, I just want the moves he does or doesn't make to follow the fucking narrative that he is telling us.
Tell me when that has happened? When has Joe told us the direction of the team and then made moves that seemed to help us build in that direction?
Probably top 55 protected or something. Last guy I remember us trading a pick like that for was Shabazz Napier. Wasn’t a great player, but he played here for two years and was fun for a little while. That’s more than anyone could ask for a pick that likely won’t even convey.How do you "Heavily Protect" a second round pick?
"though"
I don't think the timeline for the rebuild is that soon. I was thinking at least another two drafts of being terrible.People can always excuse kicking the can down the road with this. Joe been excused with "there's nothing he can do" way too much, especially since "he's just cleaning up Olsheys mess" doesn't apply anymore.
I just want them to fully commit to a direction other than mediocrity, and it feels like they just want to gear up to make a play-in next season.
This team is projected to be in the tax after using its draft picks this off-season.Another fun fact about our supposed "direction."
This team will have the 14th highest payroll in the league this year and finish 14th in its conference.
Too bad our absentee owner doesn't care about $ this year.
I agree. That's exactly why they should've been eager to shop Brogdon and Grant for assets to help maximize the window that's 2+ years away.I don't think the timeline for the rebuild is that soon. I was thinking at least another two drafts of being terrible.
You just said you wanted us to compete for a play-in next season.I agree. That's exactly why they should've been eager to shop Brogdon and Grant for assets to help maximize the window that's 2+ years away.
Joe signed professional tankers. Cronin handed Simons and Grant long term deals. Portland now has 2 very talented players who are not All-stars, which makes tanking for a pick perfectly legal under the new CBA.When has Joe told us the direction of the team and then made moves that seemed to help us build in that direction?
No I didn't, I said "I just want them to fully commit to a direction other than mediocrity, and it feels like they just want to gear up to make a play-in next season."You just said you wanted us to compete for a play-in next season.
Thanks for the clarification.No I didn't, I said "I just want them to fully commit to a direction other than mediocrity, and it feels like they just want to gear up to make a play-in next season."
Roster building should never be geared towards making a play-in, it should be about maximizing the chance to contend whether that's win-now moves or a rebuild.
And none of us know how much Brogdons veteran mentorship has helped Scoot whatsoever. If we only spoke on things we know as a 100% fact, this forum wouldn't exist.This answer drives me nuts. NONE of us are in the front office to know what was offfered and turned down, yet some act as though they know FOR SURE a decent offer was out there and Joe just MUST have passed on it for baffling reasons.
Do you not see the hypocrisy in your own post? Come on man.
LMFAO!!!!!
Anger control management can easily be googled.
Set unrealistic expectations, better expect to be dissapointed.
The Warriors are $90m over the cap, in 11th place, and didn't shave salary at the deadline. Not sure if that shows how committed their ownership is to winning or how badly their front office is screwing them in the future.Only consolation is Warriors did nothing to improve, gotta get in where you can...lol
You're honestly comparing Dame to 19 (now 20) year old Scoot? lol.If a rookie/sophomore Dame had this Brogdon as his mentor as opposed to Earl Watson or Mo Williams, would he be better than the player he ultimately became? Because that’s what most of the “keep Brogdon” camp would have me believe—that only guys who can take minutes in the rotation can be good mentors. Again, not sure why Brogdon is a better mentor than, say, a multiple time AS like Lowry.
Are you really worried about Scoot’s confidence? Scoot’s confidence is only rivaled by Anthony Edwards among the young guys.
Despite being a significantly better offensive player, Brogdon and Scoot basically take the same amount of attempts each game.get ready to watch Grant and Brogdon again going for 40 shots combined in the 2nd half of the season


