dviss1
Emcee Referee
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2011
- Messages
- 29,741
- Likes
- 27,751
- Points
- 113
And what YOUR side doesn't understand is that background checks already exist. I have argued this until I was blue in the face, but some people just DON'T get it. I don't understand why people argue with gun owners about this. Do you think we're blowing smoke out of our asses here?
There are NOT background checks for lots of Internet sales so don't blow smoke.
Dviss, that would be like me arguing with you about what it's like to be a black man. I wouldn't dream to do that, so why do you argue with actual gun owners about the 2nd Amendment and, more specifically, about background checks? It makes ZERO sense to me.
I used to be a buyer and seller of guns. Don't assume you know me.
So if I get insurance on my gun....will that cover my ass in the chance that I have to lawfully use that gun to protect myself with?
Why not?
And you don't think anti-gun organizations would have a problem with that? Oh....they would?
Why would they? They're advocating for it.
Oh, I see....so you want insurance on our firearms to punish us then, right?
If there is a "terrble tragedy" that occurs because of your negligence with the firearm you should be held accountable.
There are too many ways for insurance requirements on firearms to be abused by both the courts and the government. Far more ways than I care to explain here.
Patient Privacy Laws. My mental health, and indeed the mental health of all Americans, is PRIVATE. That privacy shouldn't have to be suspended just because I want to exercise my Civil Right to own a firearm. It's not the government's business what anyone's mental health is, and I'm surprised that I would have to explain that to someone who's a Liberal.
So that means you're blowing smoke up everybody's ass is when y'all say you want to do something about the mentally ill. Also, it seems like your people is completely fine with having a registry of people who purchase marijuana in our state but not for those who purchase guns.... Riddle me that...
Oh give me a break. Did you know that many Liberals actually believe that the NRA manufactures guns? No shit, I'm not making that up.
The last source that I checked that didn't have MDA and Bloomberg's name on it, the NRA's main source of income was from NRA members, not the corporations. A few thousand dollar sponsorships here and there for ads is hardly a big source of income for an organization as big as the NRA.
That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. The majority of liberals do not believe that the NRA manufactures guns get the fuck out of here with that crap. I'm sure there are a fringe few of us. But there are a fringe few of y'all who believed that Obama should have done something to prevent 9/11 when he wasn't in office... Don't bring up a red herring to debate with me because that's not something that I believe in. Now that I've refuted that level of crap, it is true that they are lobbying simply to continue to increase firearm sales. The amount of money that is given to the NRA is given by their members because it's dues They're not lobbying for the 2nd Amendment. That's simply a tool they use to continue to enrich gun manufacturers.
There are NOT background checks for lots of Internet sales so don't blow smoke.
Dviss, that would be like me arguing with you about what it's like to be a black man. I wouldn't dream to do that, so why do you argue with actual gun owners about the 2nd Amendment and, more specifically, about background checks? It makes ZERO sense to me.
I used to be a buyer and seller of guns. Don't assume you know me.
So if I get insurance on my gun....will that cover my ass in the chance that I have to lawfully use that gun to protect myself with?
Why not?
And you don't think anti-gun organizations would have a problem with that? Oh....they would?
Why would they? They're advocating for it.
Oh, I see....so you want insurance on our firearms to punish us then, right?
If there is a "terrble tragedy" that occurs because of your negligence with the firearm you should be held accountable.
There are too many ways for insurance requirements on firearms to be abused by both the courts and the government. Far more ways than I care to explain here.
Patient Privacy Laws. My mental health, and indeed the mental health of all Americans, is PRIVATE. That privacy shouldn't have to be suspended just because I want to exercise my Civil Right to own a firearm. It's not the government's business what anyone's mental health is, and I'm surprised that I would have to explain that to someone who's a Liberal.
So that means you're blowing smoke up everybody's ass is when y'all say you want to do something about the mentally ill. Also, it seems like your people is completely fine with having a registry of people who purchase marijuana in our state but not for those who purchase guns.... Riddle me that...
Oh give me a break. Did you know that many Liberals actually believe that the NRA manufactures guns? No shit, I'm not making that up.
The last source that I checked that didn't have MDA and Bloomberg's name on it, the NRA's main source of income was from NRA members, not the corporations. A few thousand dollar sponsorships here and there for ads is hardly a big source of income for an organization as big as the NRA.
That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. The majority of liberals do not believe that the NRA manufactures guns get the fuck out of here with that crap. I'm sure there are a fringe few of us. But there are a fringe few of y'all who believed that Obama should have done something to prevent 9/11 when he wasn't in office... Don't bring up a red herring to debate with me because that's not something that I believe in. Now that I've refuted that level of crap, it is true that they are lobbying simply to continue to increase firearm sales. The amount of money that is given to the NRA is given by their members because it's dues They're not lobbying for the 2nd Amendment. That's simply a tool they use to continue to enrich gun manufacturers.
