OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread - January edition

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

And the Bulls save salary $$$ by trading Teague.
Yep. I think this has more to it then thinking Teague sucks since I think CHI is going cheap. Denny would probably know better on this one though.
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

Wonder if Taj Gibson would be worth blowing the Warriors' 11 million TPE on...
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

So Paul George did a 360 windmill.

In a real game.

834243701.gif


Shades of VC
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

wow, i'm not sure I remember someone going back across their body---normally 360s are dunked in the same rotation as the 360.
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

CHA took MIA to OT, down 2 with 2min left.
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

So Paul George did a 360 windmill.

In a real game.

834243701.gif


Shades of VC

He barely converted that, so definitely not the hangtime that Carter had in his youth.
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

It was a nice dunk but come on

tumblr_mba7bnYed21r74y33o1_500.gif
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

Doing it in game versus a dunk contest is pretty impressive.
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

The Washington Wizards have not been over .500 at any point since October of 2009.
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

The Washington Wizards have not been over .500 at any point since October of 2009.

And they're a game and a half out of the 3 seed in the east!
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

Per Sam Amico twitter:#Celtics*G Rajon Rondo,*#PelicansG Eric Gordon and G/F Tyreke Evans could all be on move soon, reports*@Mitch_Lawrence*in his#NBA*notes.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

Per Sam Amico twitter:#Celtics*G Rajon Rondo,*#PelicansG Eric Gordon and G/F Tyreke Evans could all be on move soon, reports*@Mitch_Lawrence*in his#NBA*notes.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk

I wish we had pieces to trade, since I worry that some good teams are about to get better soon.
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

Oooh. I'd like Gordon from the bench.
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

I wish we had pieces to trade, since I worry that some good teams are about to get better soon.

I don't want any of those players on the Blazers. Rondo is obviously a star, but not on this team. Gordon is a volume shooter, and Evans is adequate, at best, but without the outside shot of Wes.
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

[video=youtube;alRu7SdLdBg]

:lol:
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

Oooh. I'd like Gordon from the bench.

At this point, for the salary, I'd rather have McCollum, who is only going to get better at creating good shots for himself, and burying a three once or twice a game. Gordon's defense may be worse than CJ's, which is a saying something.
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

CJ is extremely talented.... right now he seems unsure of himself, which is so strange because the guy was so confident in SL and DLeague. He and Lillard are very different in that regard. Dame never showed a bit of fear from day one. I think CJ is still trying to find his role and feel his way in the rotation, but the talent is there. He can drive, he can shoot, and he can pass, but we are definitely seeing that he's not a point guard, which is fine because we already knew that from summer league.
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

That Paul George dunk is the best I've ever seen. In the flow of a game seconds after playing intense defense is way more difficult than having 5 minutes and an open rim.
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

That Paul George dunk is the best I've ever seen. In the flow of a game seconds after playing intense defense is way more difficult than having 5 minutes and an open rim.

The best part is it happened in a game vs. Flop City. Not only did the Pacers easily beat the overrated Clippers, George totally stole the spotlight from their overrated superstar. Probably confused the heck out of everyone at Sports Center that the Dunk of the Night (of the Year?) came in the IND/LAC game, but it wasn't Blake Griffin.

BNM
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

BTW, in a comparison of 'superstars" from last night's game, Blake Griffin had 19 points on 6-18 shooting. Paul George had almost twice as many points (36) on fewer FG attempts (12-17).

Look for George to win Eastern Conference Player of the Week:

"George shot 12-for-17 overall, 5-for-6 from the 3-point range. In the last three games, George has averaged 30.7 points, shot 30-for-52 (.577) overall and 13-for-21 (.619) from 3-point range."

Another interesting fact I didn't know:

"At 21-1, the Pacers have assured a winning record at home for the 25th consecutive season, the longest active streak in the league."

That's an impressive streak. The Pacers haven't always been a great team, but even when they were bad, they took care of business at home.

BNM
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

I remember that they were my favorite non-Blazer team in the late 80's early 90's. We always let my little brother be "Haywoode Workman" in our games. Their series with BOS in 91 was one for the ages.
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

BTW, in a comparison of 'superstars" from last night's game, Blake Griffin had 19 points on 6-18 shooting. Paul George had almost twice as many points (36) on fewer FG attempts (12-17).

Look for George to win Eastern Conference Player of the Week:

"George shot 12-for-17 overall, 5-for-6 from the 3-point range. In the last three games, George has averaged 30.7 points, shot 30-for-52 (.577) overall and 13-for-21 (.619) from 3-point range."

Another interesting fact I didn't know:

"At 21-1, the Pacers have assured a winning record at home for the 25th consecutive season, the longest active streak in the league."

That's an impressive streak. The Pacers haven't always been a great team, but even when they were bad, they took care of business at home.

BNM

I don't consider either Griffin or George to be "superstars." All-Stars? Sure, but neither has done enough yet in their career to make me call them 'superstars.'
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

I don't consider either Griffin or George to be "superstars." All-Stars? Sure, but neither has done enough yet in their career to make me call them 'superstars.'

The term isn't thrown around because of their actual production on their court. It's the ratio of plays to highlights these days, and marketability. Not ability.
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

The term isn't thrown around because of their actual production on their court. It's the ratio of plays to highlights these days, and marketability. Not ability.

The league has a way of anointing superstars that's based more on marketability than accomplishment. Once anointed, they get favorable treatment form the officials, get featured on the NBA web site and TV promotions, get more endorsement deals, etc.

I agree with PapaG that Blake Griffin does not have superstar accomplishments, but the NBA definitely markets him as a superstar. Every time he dunks the ball (doesn't matter if the Clippers win or lose) it's going to be all over NBA TV and nba.com. Jeez, it's just two points. We know he can dunk already. Ever since his rookie year, he's gotten extremely preferential treatment from the officials.

Paul George has already accomplished more than Blake Griffin, and seems to be the NBA's newest chosen one. Unlike Blake Griffin, George is actually improving and may truly have superstar talent to go with his superstar pedigree. He won MIP last year at the age of 22 and has improved even more this year at the age of 23. If the Pacers make the finals, especially if they win, I think George will have the credentials to match his superstar status.

BNM
 
Re: OFFICIAL 2014 Around the NBA thread

The league has a way of anointing superstars that's based more on marketability than accomplishment. Once anointed, they get favorable treatment form the officials, get featured on the NBA web site and TV promotions, get more endorsement deals, etc.

I agree with PapaG that Blake Griffin does not have superstar accomplishments, but the NBA definitely markets him as a superstar. Every time he dunks the ball (doesn't matter if the Clippers win or lose) it's going to be all over NBA TV and nba.com. Jeez, it's just two points. We know he can dunk already. Ever since his rookie year, he's gotten extremely preferential treatment from the officials.

Paul George has already accomplished more than Blake Griffin, and seems to be the NBA's newest chosen one. Unlike Blake Griffin, George is actually improving and may truly have superstar talent to go with his superstar pedigree. He won MIP last year at the age of 22 and has improved even more this year at the age of 23. If the Pacers make the finals, especially if they win, I think George will have the credentials to match his superstar status.

BNM

We agree! I just don't think George is quite to what I consider a "superstar." If the Pacers make it to the Finals behind a dominant George, that would prove a lot to me, and would elevate him to the level of a Durant, IMO, if he has huge numbers in doing so.

LeBron James is definitely top echelon, though, followed by Durant, IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top