Exclusive OFFICIAL AROUND THE NBA: JANUARY 2023 (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Which of these players is currently your favorite non-blazer?

  • Total voters
    48
Status
Not open for further replies.
Tatum and Brown combined for 3 assists. Not gonna win in playoffs without ball movement.
 
Boston's announcer says worst 3 quarters of defense ever for a Boston Celtics team.
 
So the Thunder scored 150 on the Celtics. Makes losing a couple close games feel a little better I guess.
 
wow so the Thunder beat up the Celtics again
 
Tince said:
His talent is undeniable. Will his body hold up seems to be the only question.
Click to expand...

both of the Pels' stars have durability issues. Ingram has only averaged 60 games a year entering this season and he's already missed 22 this year. And coming into this season, Zion had played in 85 games and missed 141. wow

the silver lining is without Zion and Ingram, CJ has clear sailing to jack up 25 shots a game
 
Wild shot by Lauri. Full court pass, he catches and makes a 3. Just a tenth of a second too late. Utah is done.
 
wizenheimer said:
silver lining is without Zion and Ingram, CJ has clear sailing to jack up 25 shots a game
Click to expand...

Maybe it's just another way to look at it but I see that as the Pels are lucky to have CJ to keep them afloat during these stretches that players are injured.
 
Markkanen played very well during the Eurobasket. He was the key for Finland, and the main reason they won their games. Not surprising to see it carry over. He’s quietly becoming one of the best SF’s in the league.
 
Fairly-Hard said:
Maybe it's just another way to look at it but I see that as the Pels are lucky to have CJ to keep them afloat during these stretches that players are injured.
Click to expand...
Agreed.

Teams could do much worse than CJ iso ball. CJ could drop 60, I wouldn’t be surprised in the least to see him accomplishing that.

Not sure what his career high is, I have to google it…

Points: 50 v. Bulls on 01/31/18

Rebounds: 11 2 times, last v. Spurs on 02/12/22

Offensive Rebounds: 4 3 times, last @ Kings on 11/24/21

Defensive Rebounds: 10 @ Jazz on 11/01/17
 
PDXFonz said:
Agreed.

Teams could do much worse than CJ iso ball. CJ could drop 60, I wouldn’t be surprised in the least to see him accomplishing that.

Not sure what his career high is, I have to google it…

Points: 50 v. Bulls on 01/31/18

Rebounds: 11 2 times, last v. Spurs on 02/12/22

Offensive Rebounds: 4 3 times, last @ Kings on 11/24/21

Defensive Rebounds: 10 @ Jazz on 11/01/17
Click to expand...
CJ scored 50 in 29 minutes. Dame did too
 
uh oh
The wolves do need to do something.
 
Is Russell's trade value higher or lower than Simons'?
 
theprunetang said:
Lower. Easily.
Click to expand...
Why do you think that? D-Lo is only 3 years older. Their PER's and TS%'s are basically identical. Simons is better from 3; Russell appears to be a better distributor and a less-bad defender. Seems like they should be viewed very similarly.
 
PtldPlatypus said:
Why do you think that? D-Lo is only 3 years older. Their PER's and TS%'s are basically identical. Simons is better from 3; Russell appears to be a better distributor and a less-bad defender. Seems like they should be viewed very similarly.
Click to expand...
He's 3 years older. He's not a good outside shooter, which teams usually want out of their PG. Russel isn't a good defender, so being less bad doesn't really amount to much of anything, he still is a bad defender. He's a PG, versus Ant playing SG, so his assist #s should look higher, different roles. When Simons has played point this year with Dame out, he's shown to be about as good as a distributor. Russel is also an expiring contract, while Ant is locked in for 4 years. I don't believe many would view them as having comparable values, personally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top