OG

[Natebishop3]

Enter Josh Hart.

Well.... see... that's a problem. Your star players can't be played off the court. That's not a recipe for winning.

 

[SharpeScooterShooter]

Well.... see... that's a problem. Your star players can't be played off the court. That's not a recipe for winning.

I disagree. I think it can be a plug and play depending on the opponent.
That and i also expect Billups to accelerate Ants defensive improvements.

 

[HailBlazers]

Calabro is more annoying to me than Blevins.

 

[SharpesTriumph]

Here’s a question: let’s say Sharpe really is another Anthony Edwards. If we’re playing this game of hypotheticals, does this team really need Anthony Edwards more than an elite wing defender that can consistently space the court?

When the Blazers are nowhere close to contending and need a large influx of talent, the answer to this question is obvious.

 

[Natebishop3]

Calabro is more annoying to me than Blevins.

True...... Calabro didn't score ANY points last season!

 

[andalusian]

True...... Calabro didn't score ANY points last season!

Yes, but if you take the amount of points he didn't score and divide it by the number of minutes he played, his per/36 is off the charts.

 

[SharpesTriumph]

I don’t care about trade value, I care about who makes the Blazers better on the court.

Why?

 

[Natebishop3]

Yes, but if you take the amount of points he didn't score and divide it by the number of minutes he played, his per/36 is off the charts.

 

[SharpesTriumph]

I don’t think there’s a right or wrong answer, I just questioned whether this team really needs another scoring guard.

I guess a better question is Daniels or Sharpe. Cuz I’d make my case for Daniels.

You don't draft a player in the lottery for immediate fit.

 

[Blazinaway]

Just like Detroit with Grant tell TOR thanks but no thanks, you can keep OG unless you want to be reasonable, I think nothing happens here and prefer that

 

[B-Roy]

 

[B-Roy]

What if the move is 7 for 12 + Dort.

Duren at 12, then move Duren + Hart for OG?

Dort replaces Hart.

 

[illmatic99]

What if the move is 7 for 12 + Dort.

Duren at 12, then move Duren + Hart for OG?

Dort replaces Hart.

so 7+ Hart for OG?

nah.

 

[B-Roy]

so 7+ Hart for OG?

nah.

Its 7 + Hart for OG + Dort.

 

[BLAZINGGIANTS]

so 7+ Hart for OG?

nah.

Well, we'd also be receiving Dort.

 

[illmatic99]

Its 7 + Hart for OG + Dort.

ah ya. I think i prefer Hart to Dort. i think i'd be open to this if Lou went Toronto's way and we don't include Hart.

 

[B-Roy]

ah ya. I think i prefer Hart to Dort. i think i'd be open to this if Lou went Toronto's way and we don't include Hart.

Well one thing to take into account is that Dort makes significantly less than Hart. Gives us more room under the tax to make salary eating moves in the future.

Also, can't have your cake and eat it too...

 

[oldmangrouch]

In his career, OG has been healthy for 301 games out of a possible 410. His last 2 seasons have been his worst for availability.

Not worth what Toronto is apparently asking.

 

[Natebishop3]

In his career, OG has been healthy for 301 games out of a possible 410. His last 2 seasons have been his worst for availability.

Not worth what Toronto is apparently asking.

Guys that young really shouldn't be hurt that much. It's concerning.

 

[Predator]

 

[Predator]

Whoops B Roy had it first lol

 

[BankTeller]

Its 7 + Hart for OG + Dort.

That doesn’t make it better for me. Hart will play more in the playoffs and just has more size.

 

[TBpup]

So a S&T with Nurk doesn't work? (oh, missed the 'elite' part)

 

[RR7]

In his career, OG has been healthy for 301 games out of a possible 410. His last 2 seasons have been his worst for availability.

Not worth what Toronto is apparently asking.

390, not 410. It looks like about 15 of those from this season were health and safety protocols.
The previous season, 10 were for rest and health and safety protocols, and then at the end of the year, they basically did what we did with Ant and Nurk and shut him down to continue their tank, so a total of 18 games last year were of no concern. 8 games the prior season he missed for "personal reasons".

So in his career for legitimate injuries, he's missed 8, 7, 3, 11, and then this past year 19. 48 games in 5 years. An average of playing about 72-73 games a season. I'm good with that. Not overly concerning.

 

[illmatic99]

 

[oldmangrouch]

390, not 410. It looks like about 15 of those from this season were health and safety protocols.
The previous season, 10 were for rest and health and safety protocols, and then at the end of the year, they basically did what we did with Ant and Nurk and shut him down to continue their tank, so a total of 18 games last year were of no concern. 8 games the prior season he missed for "personal reasons".

So in his career for legitimate injuries, he's missed 8, 7, 3, 11, and then this past year 19. 48 games in 5 years. An average of playing about 72-73 games a season. I'm good with that. Not overly concerning.

In 5 years he has only passed the 70 game mark once. in the 60s twice, and in the 40s twice. How do you get an average of 70+ out of that?

 

[RR7]

In 5 years he has only passed the 70 game mark once. in the 60s twice, and in the 40s twice. How do you get an average of 70+ out of that?

I just showed you my math on it

 

[oldmangrouch]

I just showed you my math on it

I guess he also shot 100% from the field - if you ignore the shots he missed.

 

[PtldPlatypus]

I guess he also shot 100% from the field - if you ignore the shots he missed.

Point is that a good chunk of the games he's missed have been because of COVID, and it's not reasonable to hold those against him with regard to injury history.

 

[RR7]

I guess he also shot 100% from the field - if you ignore the shots he missed.

Rest, personal reasons and covid aren't some reoccurring injury that we'd have to be scared of, but whatever.