Olshey interview with Jaynes

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

“Had an instance last year to commit to guys, were reluctant to do it, turns out we were involved in a potentially big trade that would have conveyed multiple draft picks, and we wouldn’t have been able to pursue that opportunity if we had given our word to a player or an agent.”
Paul George?

- mentioned the TPE and the MLE and said both are roster building tools that will be “in play” for Portland.

Did PA sign off on this?

Pelicans series “provided real clear lens of what we need to do this off-season to build the roster to avoid that in the future.”

“Focus maybe needs to be shifted from youth and draft picks to guys we know hit certain benchmarks and have bodies of work we can rely on come April.”

- mentioned they need to do whatever it takes to “compete at the highest level” once they are in the playoffs. Brought up veteran players again.

I don't get it. We aren't one average vet player away from suddenly beating the Pelicans. They outclassed us so thoroughly, we didn't look like we belonged. We need a star. Or two. And we aren't getting that by trading our pick/scrubs.
 
Paul George?



Did PA sign off on this?



I don't get it. We aren't one average vet player away from suddenly beating the Pelicans. They outclassed us so thoroughly, we didn't look like we belonged. We need a star. Or two. And we aren't getting that by trading our pick/scrubs.

Why do you think one series becomes automatically the same outcome if played again? The series could be played again and I bet the results would be different.
 
Why do you think one series becomes automatically the same outcome if played again? The series could be played again and I bet the results would be different.

Maybe, but more realistically if they played another team the results probably would’ve been different. Not every team is perfectly built like NO to stop our strengths. I know we could’ve beaten OKC, Minny, and SA.
 
No idea why NY would do that and take on an extra year of salary, but Kanter would just take away minutes from Zach. Why do we want that?
They probably wouldn't but maybe they would think he was a better fit? As for Collins, what if we traded him and Harkless and Leonard and a draft pick for Otto Porter? (I actually don't think I would want to be stuck with two lumbering guys like Nurkic and Kanter in today's NBA.)
 
They probably wouldn't but maybe they would think he was a better fit? As for Collins, what if we traded him and Harkless and Leonard and a draft pick for Otto Porter? (I actually don't think I would want to be stuck with two lumbering guys like Nurkic and Kanter in today's NBA.)
I think Bones-Jones had some trades where we get Porter. Is there any way to do that without giving up Collins? I don't really see many attainable guys who could significantly help us.
 
I guess my thought process is that we can’t make lopsided trades salary wise or sign free agents.

What flexibility are you referring to in terms of player acquisition?
The one year we could accept lopsided trades was when Dame and CJ were still on their rookie deals. Same with any thoughts on having worthwhile cap space. That was a very small window that won't open again as long as Dame and CJ are on the team.

We are however one of the only teams that can take on a bad contract via the Trade Exception in a "lopsided trade" despite being over the cap. Spending as much as we want this summer by using the trade exceptions, draft picks, tax-MLE, min contracts, and/or re-signing our 4 free agents and we can use all of those options, which is pretty flexible. If they try to avoid the tax next year then they can't really use any of those options. Last year for example they didn't use their tax-MLE because they were trying to stay under the tax line. However that could have brought a good player in that would've helped if they didn't care about the tax, like Tyreke Evans. I know it sounds completely backwards but there is actually more flexibility for teams being above the luxury tax than below it. Of course being below the salary cap is the best option but there is no possible way to accomplish that.
 
In the end we'll sign Chris Bosh for peanuts and gamble on his health
 
I think Bones-Jones had some trades where we get Porter. Is there any way to do that without giving up Collins? I don't really see many attainable guys who could significantly help us.

Problem with that idea is that I don't see anyway the Wiz move Porter unless it's a blow me away type deal. Oubre would be a more realistic target.
 
Problem with that idea is that I don't see anyway the Wiz move Porter unless it's a blow me away type deal. Oubre would be a more realistic target.

Oubre would fit into that Plumlee/Nets example Neil kept bringing up in his interview with Jaynes. I believe he has to get paid soon, similar to Plumlee when we traded for him. I’d give our pick for Oubre.
 
Oubre would fit into that Plumlee/Nets example Neil kept bringing up in his interview with Jaynes. I believe he has to get paid soon, similar to Plumlee when we traded for him. I’d give our pick for Oubre.

Nice thing about Oubre is he is still only 22 years old so he's not much older and about the same age as some of the prospects we might go after but with a few years of NBA experience. We could use the smaller trade exception plus the pick to acquire him.
 
I doubt we'll bring in any shooters, since Paul Allen is paying money right now to get rid of them.

Are you talking about Crabbe? We have no other shooters on this current team besides Dame and CJ, and I doubt they will "pay" to get rid of them. There is no doubt in my mind that they will at least try to bring in more veteran shooting. They tried last last summer with George and Melo.
 
Nice thing about Oubre is he is still only 22 years old so he's not much older and about the same age as some of the prospects we might go after but with a few years of NBA experience. We could use the smaller trade exception plus the pick to acquire him.

I wonder what Washington’s plan is. Oubre is in line to get paid next summer. He’s a starting caliber wing, but they already have Porter, who while overpaid, is still a superior player. Wizards are already in the tax. Are they really going to commit to matching on Oubre, because there definitely will be another team out there ready to pony up for a young wing. Or will they try and trade Porter? I can’t see them keeping both.
 
I really like the idea of Blake Griffin that someone else brought up. As a #1 option, no. As a #2 or #3 option with Damian, CJ and Nurk? I love it. He's a great passer. He still plays most of his games. It's a great upgrade for peanuts. It's Paul's money, not mine. We'll be over the cap anyways. I like it very much.
 
I really like the idea of Blake Griffin that someone else brought up. As a #1 option, no. As a #2 or #3 option with Damian, CJ and Nurk? I love it. He's a great passer. He still plays most of his games. It's a great upgrade for peanuts. It's Paul's money, not mine. We'll be over the cap anyways. I like it very much.
Exactly - already over the cap with or without him, so might as well get him! (As long as you're not giving up Dame/CJ/Nurk.) Bonus is that the trade would NEED to include Turner in order for the financials to work.
 
I doubt we'll bring in any shooters, since Paul Allen is paying money right now to get rid of them. - GriLtCheeZ

Are you talking about Crabbe? We have no other shooters on this current team besides Dame and CJ, and I doubt they will "pay" to get rid of them. There is no doubt in my mind that they will at least try to bring in more veteran shooting. They tried last last summer with George and Melo.

No, I'm talking about the million bucks Paul Allen gave to that gun control bill in Washington. Just a joke.
 
Last edited:
Europe, especially Madrid has excellent valet parking.
Well, there you have it. In addition to toting the luggage to and from the plane they can park the cars at the practice facility.
 
No, why not? He'd make a great backup to CJ. The guy's a lights out long ball shooter and two inches taller than CJ. He's also got hustle up the ying yang. My only concern would be how much money he'd want.
 
Exactly - already over the cap with or without him, so might as well get him! (As long as you're not giving up Dame/CJ/Nurk.) Bonus is that the trade would NEED to include Turner in order for the financials to work.

Blake is an asshole, but I wonder if getting traded and then missing the playoffs has humbled him at all.

I also wonder if playing with a strong leader, like Dame will keep him in line, or if paying for a player's coach like Stotts will cause him to revert to his previous level of assholeness.

Still, he would give us a legitimate Big 3. In addition to his scoring he's also a very good ball handler and a great passer for his size/position.

Having a big man who can handle the ball and pass like he can would prevent teams from killing our offense at the point of attack by swarming Dame. The guy averaged 6.2 APG in his half season in DET. To put that in perspective, that's almost as many APG as Dame (6.6) and more than C.J. and Turner combined (5.6). And this is from a power forward. That would certainly go a long way toward helping us avoid being last in the league in assists again.

It would also give us that reliable third scoring threat we have been lacking for years.

If you're going to be paying tax anyway, might as well go all in. Injury history and general douchery are the only red flags. Have a team of INDEPENDENT doctors examine his heath records, and if they give him the thumbs up, go for it.

BNM
 
No, why not? He'd make a great backup to CJ. The guy's a lights out long ball shooter and two inches taller than CJ. He's also got hustle up the ying yang. My only concern would be how much money he'd want.

No.
 
Paul George?



Did PA sign off on this?



I don't get it. We aren't one average vet player away from suddenly beating the Pelicans. They outclassed us so thoroughly, we didn't look like we belonged. We need a star. Or two. And we aren't getting that by trading our pick/scrubs.

Rome wasn't built in a day. You keep adding pieces that makes the team better but the Pelicans are already beatable as one bad series doesn't define the future either.. In two years the team should be in a better financial place and possibly more flexibility to keep building. Hopefully while we keep building the Rockets and Warriors will be sliding.
 
Blake is an asshole, but I wonder if getting traded and then missing the playoffs has humbled him at all.

I also wonder if playing with a strong leader, like Dame will keep him in line, or if paying for a player's coach like Stotts will cause him to revert to his previous level of assholeness.

Still, he would give us a legitimate Big 3. In addition to his scoring he's also a very good ball handler and a great passer for his size/position.

Having a big man who can handle the ball and pass like he can would prevent teams from killing our offense at the point of attack by swarming Dame. The guy averaged 6.2 APG in his half season in DET. To put that in perspective, that's almost as many APG as Dame (6.6) and more than C.J. and Turner combined (5.6). And this is from a power forward. That would certainly go a long way toward helping us avoid being last in the league in assists again.

It would also give us that reliable third scoring threat we have been lacking for years.

If you're going to be paying tax anyway, might as well go all in. Injury history and general douchery are the only red flags. Have a team of INDEPENDENT doctors examine his heath records, and if they give him the thumbs up, go for it.

BNM
I'll trust Olshey's judgment. He knows Blake better than any of us.
 
Any explanation you want to attach to that? Or is this simply a pronouncement from our moderator that we must not question? I'm flexible.

I'd rather bring in young talent that has the possibility to develop into a tradable asset or to allow us to trade someone else than bring in a player at the end of their career that is only going to get worse. I also remember @HCP saying something about how Wes was kind of an ass the last year he was here.
 
I'd rather bring in young talent that has the possibility to develop into a tradable asset or to allow us to trade someone else than bring in a player at the end of their career that is only going to get worse. I also remember @HCP saying something about how Wes was kind of an ass the last year he was here.
Last two......
 
I'd rather bring in young talent that has the possibility to develop into a tradable asset or to allow us to trade someone else than bring in a player at the end of their career that is only going to get worse. I also remember @HCP saying something about how Wes was kind of an ass the last year he was here.

Plus, we only have one Evan Turner and we're trading him for Blake Griffin.

I never thought I'd say it, but with all the trades being proposed here, I almost wish we had more than one Evan Turner.

BNM
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top