I over-stated when I said "dominated". I guess i am concerned they might have trouble with a team with a stronger running game than WA.
sure...that's possible
they had trouble with Indiana but the Hoosier averaged 70 yards more a game on the ground than Wahington; and they had a great defense and a great senior QB
USC, Iowa, and Northwestern all had/have better running games than Washington
* Northwestern ran for 178 yards but 112 of those 178 yards came in the last 9 minutes of the 4th Q after the Ducks led 34-0 and were playing their 2nd and 3rd unit defenders; and 79 of those yards came on one run after the 2 minute warning. Take away that run and NW gained 99 yards on 37 carries
* Iowa ran for 101 yards (Oregon ran for 261) but only for 2.3 yards/carry
* and last week, USC ran for 52 yards; 1.9 yards a carry
as I said, I think the Duck game plans on both sides of the ball were a little different today than they have been. I don't think you can gauge Oregon's run defense by what you saw today, although sure, it's possible a great running team can gash them. And on offense, the Ducks running game was a bit of a rope-a-dope. The Ducks ran enough times to keep their play-action effective
****************************************************
by the way, if the Ducks WR's are/were healthy, they'd have Dakorian Moore, Malik Benson, Gary Bryant Jr., Jeremiah McClellan, and Evan Stewart rotating. I'm not sure there's a deeper WR rotation in FBS
add in Sadiq and Jamari Johnson at TE, and the three-headed beast at RB, and that might be the most high level offensive weapons the Ducks have ever had