illmatic99
formerly yuyuza1
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 57,747
- Likes
- 56,262
- Points
- 113
Ya well, I hated the way Nate used him. He might have been more productive as a Blazer, but him playing >25 mpg was a detriment to the team.
				
			Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
as I just said that's just too much salary IMO for POR to take on just to get harris


I don't want TO back at that price, but we'd be getting the old Outlaw, not the NJ one. Nate knows how to use him, and I think the smaller town atmosphere makes Travis more comfortable.

Lets keep in mind all the Harris/NJ talk could be just smoke to get Denver to panic a bit. If NJ does other trades then Denver loses big time leverage to New York. Look behind the curtain.

WFAN just was doing a nets contest for tickets and the host said " if harris isnt in portland by then"
They think hes 100% gone. However the co host said "take em please"
so you would rather have miiler/pryz then those 3 next year? yeah you are insane
UPDATE: This is just one version of a long-rumored trade between Portland and New Jersey involving Miller. PLEASE ... no more Travis Outlaw!
All along I've thought that the Trail Blazers would make a move just prior to next week's trade deadline. And all along, I figured that move would include dealing Andre Miller.
I didn't think that would be the only move, but I figured it would be a key piece.
Now, I'm not so sure. In fact, the recent uptick in play by the Trail Blazers along with the emergence of LaMarcus Aldridge as a big-time player has changed that. And I'm not usually the guy who confuses short-term success with long-term gain. This franchise needs to think big picture and that vision would normally see someone a lot younger at point guard -- a player who would be young enough to lead this core group of players on a deep playoff run someday.
But Miller has forced me to look at things a little differently. For one thing, I think he has a lot to do with the team's recent improvement -- yes, real improvement. It's not just a different cast of characters out there playing recently, it's that those players have improved. They're playing much better together and making smarter decisions.
I think Miller has a lot to do with that. He's one of the smartest point guards in the league, a man who relies on cunning, guile and experience rather than raw physical skills. He's tough, he plays hard every night and he doesn't ever seemed deterred by momentary setbacks or failures.
He just keeps coming at you, play after play.
He's set a great example of professionalism on the floor and I believe he's been instrumental in helping Aldridge become the player he's become. Watch how often Miller gets Aldridge the ball not necessarily when Aldridge calls for it, but when Miller sees he's established perfect post position. If he's not in that spot, Miller gives him time to get there.
Small thing, big results.
The Blazers could move Miller, yes. But I think it would be a most painful departure and it's something that would really complicate the team's progress for the rest of the season and beyond.
If I were Rich Cho, it would be hard for me to make that move. I'd have to get a point guard in return and he'd have to be a good one. A good young one. And I'm not even sure Devin Harris -- the name most frequently mentioned -- fills that bill. I just haven't seen enough of him to know how well he could run this team -- and not just for the rest of this season but for seasons to come.
I do think Portland will be moving Joel Przybilla. His expiring contract makes him an attractive piece and shedding that obligation brings the Blazers down under the luxury tax. And really, if I were a team looking for a solid big man, I'd be tempted to gamble on him. Right now, he's a shadow of his former self but I do believe as a veteran player, it's taking him longer to recover from his surgery than it might take other players.
Nobody will work harder to recover, though, than Przybilla and I could make a case that he will get back to his old shotblocking self at some point.
There are rumors out there now that the Blazers are looking to add another big man. If they do, it would probably be a precursor to dealing either Przybilla or Marcus Camby. Certainly there is a much bigger market for Camby than Przybilla. Although older, Camby is still a viable starting center in the NBA -- a defender and shotblocker who could help push a good team over the top.
It's possible some people could be getting a little carried away with Portland's 10-4 record without Camby. But I'd tread softly there. The Blazers are consistently being outrebounded -- and that's a category that was a strength when Camby played.
I'd be careful about dealing Camby, too. He's a double-digit rebounding guy in big games who will block a couple of shots every night. I don't see that coming from anyone else on this roster.
All of this points out how seriously difficult Cho's job is right now. As his team sits on a six-game winning streak and occupies the fifth spot in the Western Conference standings at the All-Star break, he has to decide how much he buys into his team's recent success.
Is this team, as constituted, good enough to build on? Or is it best to just get on with some major rebuilding? Is what we're seeing now the core of a championship team?
Deep down, you have to doubt that. You have to think there are still major pieces to be added for that to happen. And to do that, some painful decisions must be made about trading away current players.
And that will mean risking short-term losses to build long-term success. And it was just a few years ago we went through that same, painful process here.
^
Do you not know how to provide a link or at least quote your source?
tags so that it is obvious that it is someone else's work (as though the capitalization/punctuation didn't make that obvious enough...)
