PapaG was banned tonight

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Its not about being thinned skined some people just get fed up.

I'm not referring to papag, if you are asking.... I actually like him a lot. Sucks he's gone.

I am saying that people take offense too easily. Sometimes you can just ask someone to please stop and most the time they do. Most the time, people are joking and don't realize they hurt someone else.
 
I'm not referring to papag, if you are asking.... I actually like him a lot. Sucks he's gone.

I am saying that people take offense too easily. Sometimes you can just ask someone to please stop and most the time they do. Most the time, people are joking and don't realize they hurt someone else.
Its not about PapaG hell i never said one word to the guy its about people in general
 
7 pg thread on this?! sigh.... one more week and we'll start hearing updates of training camp.
 
Throwing personal insults back and forth have killed forums. Debating thoughts, ideas and opinions is what make forums fun. It can be a very fine line but I think it's the most important one to draw. People will disagree with me on that and that is great. That's why it's great to have these discussions out in the open.

Don't deny that. Like I said, I think people take attacking the post as attacking the poster
 
Sounds like a Motown tune to me:

"Papa G was banned tonight
This Blaza forum just aint right

SPD done changed my words
Mr. Allen is one rich nerd

Yeah, Papa G was banned tonight"

temptations.jpeg
 
^ Does that make Denny Berry Gordy?
 
Sounds like a Motown tune to me:

"Papa G was banned tonight
This Blaza forum just aint right

SPD done changed my words
Mr. Allen is one rich nerd

Yeah, Papa G was banned tonight"

temptations.jpeg

I don't think that photo is actually the temptations. It's from the movie about the temptations :)
 
I agree. The Mods do have tough/thankless jobs here and you cannot have anyone going apeshit like PapaG did. Hopefully he just takes a couple months off and comes back. Not my decision though.

I would just like to see the unedited PM that Further sent him.

Please do not edit this, this is the email that I sent him after being called many names including racist, bigot, and lying about what I discussed in a thread about family.

Subject line:
I really do find you to be a horrible person

Body of PM:
Personality and character completely devoid of beauty. A miserable person.




Then there was one more email where I was responding to him telling me to fuck off where I just responded "Got it" and that was 100% of the PM's I sent him.
 
Please do not edit this, this is the email that I sent him after being called many names including racist, bigot, and lying about what I discussed in a thread about family.

Subject line:
I really do find you to be a horrible person

Body of PM:
Personality and character completely devoid of beauty. A miserable person.




Then there was one more email where I was responding to him telling me to fuck off where I just responded "Got it" and that was 100% of the PM's I sent him.

I can verify that this is true. That is what Further sent to PapaG and there was no mention of family or kids in the PM.
 
Please do not edit this, this is the email that I sent him after being called many names including racist, bigot, and lying about what I discussed in a thread about family.

Subject line:
I really do find you to be a horrible person

Body of PM:
Personality and character completely devoid of beauty. A miserable person.




Then there was one more email where I was responding to him telling me to fuck off where I just responded "Got it" and that was 100% of the PM's I sent him.

Well, I think it's pretty clear that you said vile things about his family.
 
hmm this is a tough room to have opinions that differ from the progressive majority. I for one will miss PapaG. Not that I agreed with his demands to be banned and so forth, but rather I respected his strength to make a stand on what he believes regardless of popular opinion. When called out he had the ability to adjust his position if he believed he had been proven wrong. All in all a deeper thinker than many.

Bow down? Hardly. I would not think you should be so proud, as you instigated a lot of the negative attention you have received. To be sure to not cross any line in the future, by intention or other, I am through with you all together.
 
hmm this is a tough room to have opinions that differ from the progressive majority. I for one will miss PapaG. Not that I agreed with his demands to be banned and so forth, but rather I respected his strength to make a stand on what he believes regardless of popular opinion. When called out he had the ability to adjust his position if he believed he had been proven wrong. All in all a deeper thinker than many.

Bow down? Hardly. I would not think you should be so proud, as you instigated a lot of the negative attention you have received. To be sure to not cross any line in the future, by intention or other, I am through with you all together.

I respect your right to say that stuff, but to call papag a deeper thinker than many of the people here, is laughable at best, and insulting at worst.

He's the guy who thought that a picture of Nate Bishop with an air pistol was a direct threat to his family. He implied that further had said things about his family in a PM and he didn't. He's created false insults against his family against multiple people.

He doesn't ever waver from his stance (unless it's a stance that's even more conservative than his own). He makes things personal.

As for the bow down thing, obviously further was joking. And the negative attention that was garnered from this was 75% papag, and 25% further. Go back and read the threads again, but this time ignore the name of the person who said it.

It's interesting to review things without the persons names in it, and you'll start to see that your personal beliefs cloud a lot of things.
 
The Truth is her defense.

I expect people to get upset with one another over topics of religion and politics. It's part of the turf, and we've been quite tolerant about such things. I'm pretty sure that PapaG has posted that he wanted to get himself banned, though maybe not recently.
How did Paul Pierce get involved in this discussion?
 
If we want to be even handed about editing her posts, we'd have to delete numerous posts saying the transgendered girl is a guy, brought it on herself, drama queen, and so on.

The balance is in letting those posts stand, and to allow crandc to call those stream of posts what she thinks they are.
FIFY
 
hmm this is a tough room to have opinions that differ from the progressive majority. I for one will miss PapaG. Not that I agreed with his demands to be banned and so forth, but rather I respected his strength to make a stand on what he believes regardless of popular opinion. When called out he had the ability to adjust his position if he believed he had been proven wrong. All in all a deeper thinker than many.

Bow down? Hardly. I would not think you should be so proud, as you instigated a lot of the negative attention you have received. To be sure to not cross any line in the future, by intention or other, I am through with you all together.

There is an ignore feature, feel free to use it on me. I however will continue to read your posts, I quite enjoy them even if I don't agree. I do hope you rethink your stance of being done with me, but I understand if you don't.

One of the maddening things about the OT forum is also one of the reasons I (and I assume you too) read the OT threads, it has extremely diverse opinions. People get testy with me, and I get testy with others, that's par for the course when two ends of the spectrum hash it out. But there is a big difference between making minor comments or dissecting ones words, and attacking the person with lies and insults.

Also, even after the lies and attacks, papag was simply asked to stop and the attacks were edited. Then he went on a rampage, starting another thread about it. Still, just asked to stop. Then he started attacking Sly, and still sly just edited but did not ban. It was Nate who came in, saw one of his mods being attacked by a multi-repeat offender, and finally said enough is enough. I never asked for the ban, sly never asked for the ban, the ban had nothing to do with his stances, the ban was brought on by papag, knowing full well that he was way over the line.
 
QT Julius

' to call papag a deeper thinker than many of the people here, is laughable at best, and insulting at worst. "

fair enough, I suppose I should have said several instead. Please do not make me point out SPD.

"He doesn't ever waver from his stance (unless it's a stance that's even more conservative than his own). He makes things personal."

I believe the same could be said for many here

"As for the bow down thing, obviously further was joking. And the negative attention that was garnered from this was 75% papag, and 25% further. Go back and read the threads again, but this time ignore the name of the person who said it."

You see it a joking, I see it as gloating. Easily proven by his continued actions. Also bolsters my first statement.
 
I take it this is the first time someone has gotten banned from this forum?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top