Sheldon Shape
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2008
- Messages
- 7,614
- Likes
- 6,487
- Points
- 113
* RealGM is wrong. That's not surprising. As far as I can tell they have never updated their machine to account for 2nd apron restrictions
* it doesn't matter whether Timelord or Vincent has more negative value. Including Timelord means the Blazers would get no bump for eating Vincent's contract. They wouldn't get a 1st round pick for that anyway. Not a chance
* adding Hayes wouldn't make for a legal trade. He doesn't have enough of a salary. Adding Wood would work, technically, but the Lakers would only be 400-500K below the 2nd apron and would have just made a 4-for-2 trade when they only have 15 players under contract. They'd have to sign another player to have the minimum roster and that would put them over the 2nd apron
so, to summarize....the Lakers would make arguably at lateral trade, at best. They'd send two unprotected 1st's AND get slammed and locked behind 2nd apron rules...all for Jerami Grant....wow
Again, you made it sound like a complete impossibility that the Lakers couldn't send back out more salary. I easily showed you differently.
Even with less than 15 on the roster, making the numbers work is pretty simple with 2nd rounds and such.
To suggest Vincent and Timelord's value is equal or similar, is laughable. We've already heard numerous reports of playoff teams trying to trade for Timelord with minimal assets. Have we heard such thing about Vincent as he languishes at the end of the Lakers bench? lol