Poll: Biggest fear of the new ownership group (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

What is your biggest fear of the new ownership group and how they run the team?

  • Them staying cheap and ruining the quality of the franchise (coaching staff hires etc)

    Votes: 16 32.0%
  • Changing everything immediately and over stepping

    Votes: 9 18.0%
  • Pissing off players by trying to run it like it's a mom and pop store

    Votes: 1 2.0%
  • Making everything the cheapest possible/always scrimping to save money

    Votes: 14 28.0%
  • Other/none (comment below)

    Votes: 10 20.0%

  • Total voters
    50
Correct if I'm wrong but wasn't the deal where the City gets the Moda, done in a way that if they pay for repairs and the team leaves, the team pays 100% of the incurred costs?
 
Yes it is sad for the people that have these jobs. I enjoyed Casey podcast, especially the old one he did with Joe Freeman.

But I can see why a new owner might question how this job directly contributes to the team winning.

We might see some massive changes on the business side of the Blazers.
Sure, a team photographer and media member will not contribute to wins and losses on the court, but I'd say there's more to a team than that, and more to making money than that. As someone else already said, you generally don't see the top, successful teams run like that, or ever really hear about it, which would make one assume they do not.
 
I just want to say that I know this cheapskate bullshit from Dundon looks bad but for fuck's sake let's give it just a little bit of time before we all condemn the guy as the worst owner in the history of sports... or even a bad owner for our team.

I'm very concerned with what has been done and reported but I think there are a couple of explanations that wouldn't be the worst.

One is that there will be a learning curve and hopefully that happens quickly and results in us not having to deal with the unnecessary cost cutting we've seen.

The other is he's coming in hot on purpose so when he cools things down and stops cutting costs in ways that don't make sense, there's a sense of relief where there would have been complaints if he didn't provide the contrast.

It's the kind of manipulative shit I've seen from hyper-competitive/high demand owners or upper-management types.
 
I just want to say that I know this cheapskate bullshit from Dundon looks bad but for fuck's sake let's give it just a little bit of time before we all condemn the guy as the worst owner in the history of sports... or even a bad owner for our team.

I'm very concerned with what has been done and reported but I think there are a couple of explanations that wouldn't be the worst.

One is that there will be a learning curve and hopefully that happens quickly and results in us not having to deal with the unnecessary cost cutting we've seen.

The other is he's coming in hot on purpose so when he cools things down and stops cutting costs in ways that don't make sense, there's a sense of relief where there would have been complaints if he didn't provide the contrast.

It's the kind of manipulative shit I've seen from hyper-competitive/high demand owners or upper-management types.
This kind of management generally leads to an exodus of quality employees.

I'm hoping he's just learning...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top