- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 34,400
- Likes
- 43,875
- Points
- 113
I didn't realize Deron was even available! I hope Cho did his due diligence and at least gave Utah an offer.
I'm sure he did, and it was toxic. Utah promptly spit it out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn't realize Deron was even available! I hope Cho did his due diligence and at least gave Utah an offer.
Our front office sucks
You guys are both smart enough to know that a team isnt going to trade their All Star to a team in their own division.
You asked "who else is out there that we could possibly go for?" I listed two that have been identified previously as salaries their teams are seeking to shed. Was that just a rhetorical question?
"There's nothing happening," Silas said prior to Tuesday's win over Toronto. "We're not just going to give people away and that's what most teams want you to do, is give your quality players away."
http://www.sportingnews.com/nba/fee...rtedly-shopping-wallace-jackson#ixzz1EnhMN2wE
Deron for Harris and Favors definitely trumps Miller and Przy, but I'm not talking about losing out on a single deal, I'm talking about the mentality of "standing pat" instead of continuing to pursue other options to make this team younger and (once again) letting assets expire with nothing coming back in return (Van Exel, Lafrenz and now Pryz and probably Miller and Camby a year from now).
I think Paul Allen, for all of his virtues of being a free spender, has also gotten a little gun-shy. Maybe it wasn't KP sitting on his hands year after year, maybe it was PA?

Are you really gullible enough to take what Quick says as facts? You think Cho turned his phone off and is taking a nap right now?![]()
Deron for Harris and Favors definitely trumps Miller and Przy, but I'm not talking about losing out on a single deal, I'm talking about the mentality of "standing pat" instead of continuing to pursue other options to make this team younger and (once again) letting assets expire with nothing coming back in return (Van Exel, Lafrenz and now Pryz and probably Miller and Camby a year from now).
I think Paul Allen, for all of his virtues of being a free spender, has also gotten a little gun-shy. Maybe it wasn't KP sitting on his hands year after year, maybe it was PA?
Gerald Wallace?
Chad Ford for just reported the Bobcats want an expiring contract and a protected first-round pick for Wallace. Come on Cho/Vulcans!
Chad on the MSP? He knows less than most of us on this board!
You think Cho turned his phone off and is taking a nap right now?![]()
Chad on the MSP? He knows less than most of us on this board!
Our front office sucks because if they stand pat they will let yet another expiring contract fall off the books for nothing.

Problem is Przybilla alone isn't enough. So it would have to be Joel+someone else.Chad Ford for just reported the Bobcats want an expiring contract and a protected first-round pick for Wallace. Come on Cho/Vulcans!
Problem is Przybilla alone isn't enough. So it would have to be Joel+Andre for Wallace
Problem is Przybilla alone isn't enough. So it would have to be Joel+Andre for Wallace.
Joel + Babbit + 1st rounder for Wallace works under the cap.
You asked "who else is out there that we could possibly go for?" I listed two that have been identified previously as salaries their teams are seeking to shed. Was that just a rhetorical question?
Or we could add in Williams or Mills. Or we could add in Marks and swap 2nd-round rookie PGs. It's not that hard.
Just because the teams were reported to want to shed salaries don't mean one it's true or two they are willing to trade for Joel's expiring contract or we'd want what they'd give us..
We're not exactly the only team that could offer an expiring and a first. Many of the other teams "rumored" to be interested could offer better picks or in the Cavs case, instant salary relief.
Because these options aren't realistic?Again, the initial question by B-Roy was "Who could we go after?" Have I said that it is a slam dunk? Have I said that Cho's a loser if he doesn't make the deal? No--all I've said is that there are other players we could pursue, and that there are ways to make the salaries match.
What are you reading into my responses that I haven't actually said?
Because these options aren't realistic?
You're really not paying attention, are you?
Chad Ford reported that the Cats are looking to trade Wallace for an expirings and a pick. We have matching expirings and a pick. Therefore, Wallace is, if the report is accurate, a realistic option. Not a slam dunk. Not a guarantee. We're not the only team that has what Charlotte wants. But it's realistic.
Are you arguing just to argue? It's really getting tedious.
Their coach also said they aren't going to trade him for nothing, or are you going to ignore that too?
Coaches don't make trades; GM's do. So yes, I will completely ignore what their coach said, because no coach is going to say "yes, we're looking to trade one of our best players." Come on, I'm sure you've been watching the NBA for long enough to get that.