Natebishop3
Don't tread on me!
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 94,169
- Likes
- 57,378
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was thinking that might be the case, I've made that mistake a bunch!
Wouldn't it be better to trade him first?This is going to be such a massive mistake.
Paying Grant that kind of money is just a continuation of Olshey’s purgatory.
Let
him
walk
You know the front office is going to do it. And they will celebrate it also. Purgatory for years to come.I been saying this for awhile now..
233M for this dude? No way
He definitely gone
Who could absorb a contract of that size? He stays.
My interpretation of this is that he would be willing to take less if that meant allowing us to put the right pieces together with him and Dame.
another "swing and a miss" for Joe?
We got what we paid for. Grant has played as expected for a trade exception and just ok draft capital.
I do not have a problem resigning Grant at the right price.
Grant just signed with Clutch.
grant changed his representation to Klutch. It's meaningless towards his free agency for all intents and purposes.What does that mean? I’m not really hip to all the sports agencies
meaningless from our perspective.why would he change if it is meaningless? clearly changing to klutch means something to him.
May not mean anything to us, but Rich Paul the owner founder will influence his thinking one way or the other as he enters free agency.What does that mean? I’m not really hip to all the sports agencies