- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 127,025
- Likes
- 147,630
- Points
- 115
I hate this man.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hate this man.
Only took 16 years for that report...
A lot of 9/11 was really fishy. Pentagon was also very weird and I stand by tower 7 being very weird as well.
World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9/11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest
Conspiracy theorists have long claimed that explosives downed World Trade Center 7, north of the Twin Towers. The long-awaited report from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) conclusively rebuts those claims. Fire alone brought down the building, the report concludes, pointing to thermal expansion of key structural members as the culprit. The report also raises concerns that other large buildings might be more vulnerable to fire-induced structural failure than previously thought.
Aug 1st, 2017
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/
I like Seth Rogen but damn he is on that hollywood political shit
I think this is a crock of shit. Buildings don't pancake in on themselves from fire...
Before that point a building of that size had never collapsed do to fire.
Before the towers a building hit by a plane has never pancaked either. There was nothing inside of either tower that would have cased the reported multiple explosions after the plane crashes.
There are no explanations for the many yellow thermite reactions pouring out of the building.
![]()
There are no explanations on how molten steel was found at ground zero
![]()
![]()
Jet fuel burns at 1800 degrees. Not hot enough to melt steel.
Steel weakens at 425 degrees and looses half its strength at 650 degrees.
So. It doesn't melt. They found MOLTEN steel.
+There was a story that the towers were under attack and an unknown party extracted gold, bearer bonds and assets of that nature. Basically a diversion for the ultimate purpose of a heist.This is not a complete thought. What are you trying to say?
Before the towers a building hit by a plane has never pancaked either. There was nothing inside of either tower that would have cased the reported multiple explosions after the plane crashes.
There are no explanations for the many yellow thermite reactions pouring out of the building.
![]()
There are no explanations on how molten steel was found at ground zero
![]()
![]()
Jet fuel burns at 1800 degrees. Not hot enough to melt steel.
+There was a story that the towers were under attack and an unknown party extracted gold, bearer bonds and assets of that nature. Basically a diversion for the ultimate purpose of a heist.
The picture you posted is not MOLTEN. It's hot but it has structure.
Only a story.... No sharks No laser beams.Certainly would be the most complex robbery plan ever, by a factor of several thousand times. Why they didn't include sharks with frickin laser beams I am not clear about.
barfo
I believe it is all together possible that our government recieved intel, knew the attack was going to happen, allowed it to happen, and used it as an oppurtunity to further their own means, whether to destroy damning information held within main frames in the towers and pentagon, as a means of population control, etc.
I don't think Saudi's had anything to do with it.
MFs say:
Don't trust the government!!!!
But trust them when they tell us about 9/11....
It was molten. Look at the black stuff on the end of the structure. It was melted at one point in time. Weakened steel doesn't look like that.
Also, it happens here real time.
I believe it is all together possible that our government recieved intel, knew the attack was going to happen, allowed it to happen, and used it as an oppurtunity to further their own means, whether to destroy damning information held within main frames in the towers and pentagon, as a means of population control, etc.
Then you claim explosions because of wisps of smoke. First, look up what scuppers are and what they do. I'm sure some of the guys in the forum who were in the Navy would be happy to explain them to you.
Hollywood is known for pushing this super left political viewSerious question: What is that exactly?
I never claimed explosions these firefighters did. I just believe them over the government:
I can think of a lot easier ways of destroying some computers or killing a few thousand people.
So we went to all that trouble just to invade Afghanistan? Seems like all we would have had to do is say they had some yellow cake. Worked just fine with Iraq.
Hollywood is known for pushing this super left political view
The people you just named, how great are there careers compared to the ones pushing the super left view? I'm sure some definitely believe in it but there are also some who have to fake it to make it. They wanna make actin movies, within them they are blasting everybody then they wanna talk to us about gun control. People like Rogen wanna make these comedies with words they then say you shouldn't use. Look how many celebrities endorsed Hillary even though the people of this country knew they couldn't trust herYou ever think that most people in Hollywood are liberal and that they are pushing their own views? I don't see Clint Eastwood pushing that view. Dennis Hopper? Dennis Miller? John Wayne?
I could continue to go down the list of Hollywood celebs who are right wing...
The bolded is a fallacy.
Buildings destroyed on 9/11. Some of these experienced partial collapses due to fire and/or debris hitting them. All were total losses.
WTC1
WTC2
WTC3
WTC4
WTC5
WTC6
WTC7
St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church
Deutsche Bank Building
You ever think that most people in Hollywood are liberal and that they are pushing their own views? I don't see Clint Eastwood pushing that view. Dennis Hopper? Dennis Miller? John Wayne?
I could continue to go down the list of Hollywood celebs who are right wing...
The bolded is a fallacy.
