Scoot injury updates

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

I think people in this thread are overreacting a little bit. Blazers are being extra cautious and for good reason. I'm sure he'll be fine.
 


He looks fine, but I just have awful memories of last year when we thought Sharpe was fine.

Next morning: Shaedon Sharpe labrum tear.

This was the tweet for Sharpe last year:



At least with Scoot's tweet it doesn't mention that his SL is over?
 


He looks fine, but I just have awful memories of last year when we thought Sharpe was fine.

Next morning: Shaedon Sharpe labrum tear.

This was the tweet for Sharpe last year:



At least with Scoot's tweet it doesn't mention that his SL is over?


Listening to Dame's diss track ... gonna break his ears.
 
I used to have a player I looked up to on my favorite team. He was drafted by my team and seemed loyal and a throwback to an older era. Recently I discovered that was either a facade, or that it could turn on a dime and he could burn down the city behind him as he left. That's what took me so long, I got my hopes up again about 11 seasons ago.
The top local Bay Area sports talk here is so sad about native son Dame. Let down. Comparing him to a garden variety James Harden me-first modern day player.

People and organizations looking out for their own interests first is expected behavior. Dame aging and Portland not close to contending, obviously there is a conflict of interests that many have noted. I don't blame Dame at all for wanting a chance to compete. I think his side has handled this entire expected transition horribly.

STOMP
 


He looks fine, but I just have awful memories of last year when we thought Sharpe was fine.

Next morning: Shaedon Sharpe labrum tear.

This was the tweet for Sharpe last year:



At least with Scoot's tweet it doesn't mention that his SL is over?

shaedon seemed fine on the bench after the injury then showed up in a sling the next game
 
When's Scoot's arm being added to the "Legit Blazer Swag" thread?
 


He looks fine, but I just have awful memories of last year when we thought Sharpe was fine.

Next morning: Shaedon Sharpe labrum tear.

This was the tweet for Sharpe last year:



At least with Scoot's tweet it doesn't mention that his SL is over?


Wow exactly one year ago today. I hope Scoot is ok. He looked solid.
 
Dude, this whole conversation is whack. 5 of the last 10 champs were “Small market” teams. There have been two dynasties in the last 25 years, the Warriors (big market) and the Spurs (small fucking market).
And Memphis, small market, has been the #2 seed two seasons in a row. I don't know if they'll make the leap, but they are very good in the regular season.
 
Regardless of how the MRI turns out, the only thing that matters here is his long term health. The importance of Summer league reps is not the smallest of considerations. He's going to be getting plenty of reps against the best of the best shortly and those lessons will benefit him most if he's 100% physically. Summer League or not, thats what they're preparing him for.

STOMP
 
Regardless of how the MRI turns out, the only thing that matters here is his long term health. The importance of Summer league reps is not the smallest of considerations. He's going to be getting plenty of reps against the best of the best shortly and those lessons will benefit him most if he's 100% physically. Summer League or not, thats what they're preparing him for.

STOMP

He already played seasons against better competition in the G-League; I'm not worried about reps.
 
Dude, this whole conversation is whack. 5 of the last 10 champs were “Small market” teams. There have been two dynasties in the last 25 years, the Warriors (big market) and the Spurs (small fucking market).

What do you consider a 'small market' team?

TV market size or ownership value?

Because 0f the last 10 years winners, Denver, Golden State, Bucks, Vomit Stains, Raptors, Warriors, Warriors, Cavs, Warriors and Spurs.

I think you could only argue that the Bucks and Spurs were a "small market" team (based on tv market size).

Bucks being 38, and Spurs 31 (conversely, Portland is 22).

Cleveland is 19, Denver is 16, G-state is 10 and Vomit Stain is #2 (not sure where Toronto ranks tbh).

And if you were to go by the last 10 Champions (as in no repeats)


Denver 16
Golden State 10
Bucks 38
Vomit Stains 2
Raptors N/A
Cavs 19
Spurs 31
Miami 18
Dallas 5
Boston 9

With their market size being listed next to their names.

All but 2 of them are better markets than Portland.
 
What do you consider a 'small market' team?

TV market size or ownership value?

Because 0f the last 10 years winners, Denver, Golden State, Bucks, Vomit Stains, Raptors, Warriors, Warriors, Cavs, Warriors and Spurs.

I think you could only argue that the Bucks and Spurs were a "small market" team (based on tv market size).

Bucks being 38, and Spurs 31 (conversely, Portland is 22).

Cleveland is 19, Denver is 16, G-state is 10 and Vomit Stain is #2 (not sure where Toronto ranks tbh).

And if you were to go by the last 10 Champions (as in no repeats)


Denver 16
Golden State 10
Bucks 38
Vomit Stains 2
Raptors N/A
Cavs 19
Spurs 31
Miami 18
Dallas 5
Boston 9

With their market size being listed next to their names.

All but 2 of them are better markets than Portland.
I don't know what the discussion is, but the Vomit Stains were the only team to win a championship (in the bubble) without a multi-time All Star already drafted by the "big market" team already on the roster.
It's obvious that being a big/huge market isn't that much of an advantage or New York and Chicago would always have better teams than Portland.
 
where is the play he hurt his shoulder? I watched the first 3 quarters and I didn't see anything
 
Back
Top