Politics Securing The Border With A Wall, Duh

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
I said your politifact article is a lie and it is.

Copy and paste the paragraph they "fact checked" and read it again and again until you understand why.

Please don't move the target back to whether Mexico could actually be made to pay for it because that is another matter.
Click to expand...

No it's not. That's the complete discussion.

I for one say build the MF the way you said and made CROWDS say, funded by Mexico. I don't believe in building it but I could swallow it more of he "the deal maker" got it funded by Mexico.

He's asking us to pay for it and that's the whole reason he allowed the shut down.

The whole problem came about because they're trying to pass a budget. You stop changing the subject...
 
dviss1 said:
No it's not. That's the complete discussion.

I for one say build the MF the way you said and made CROWDS say, funded by Mexico. I don't believe in building it but I could swallow it more of he "the deal maker" got it funded by Mexico.

He's asking us to pay for it and that's the whole reason he allowed the shut down.

The whole problem came about because they're trying to pass a budget. You stop changing the subject...
Click to expand...
The subject should be the stupid stopgap spending bills that waste billions already. I honestly don't know when we last had a real budget, do you?
 
Mediocre Man said:
So you, as well as the Democrats wanting the wall back then, would be fine with the wall if Mexico paid for it?
Click to expand...
Let's just say there would be a whole lot less complaining about it.
You've still got the issue of taking away private land to build a Wall on someone's appropriated property.
Then you've got another issue. The Wall must be built some distance inland. This means immigrants walking up to the Wall would be inside the United States and eligible for asylum application by law.
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
No, what's pathetic is arguing with people who don't want the wall in the first place by....

A. Lying about what he said and keeps rambling on about. It is quite clear from reading your "fact check" garbage that he never said he was just gonna tell Mexico to write a check and that he expected them to do so (edit, I mean pay us before we used some form of blackmail if you will like taxing remittances) The quote they are fact checking doesn't even make sense on it's face. A 70 year old man fumbled his sentences. Big deal. Take out the write a check part and he basically says "I never said Mexico is gonna pay for it, I said Mexico is gonna pay for it and they are"

B. Arguing with me about wasting money. Over 5 billion out of a gazullion dollars of waste.

I bet you if you put each thing we're going to spend money on in any of these stopgap spending bills on their own line I'd veto half of them if not more.

Probably 80 percent.
Click to expand...
No, he never said Mexico would "write a check". That part's true.
However, the clear implication from what he said was that Mexico would pay for the Wall not us. This follows from everyday English language. If I knock over your mailbox with my car and tell you I'm going to pay to have it replaced what do you think that means? Does it mean that you have to pay for it and you can get the money back by some sort of business deal that enriches you at my expense or does it mean I'll write the check?
 
Trump doesn't write checks anyway...he does money transfers and electronic banking...or at least his accountants do it for him....
 
riverman said:
Trump doesn't write checks anyway...he does money transfers and electronic banking...or at least his accountants do it for him....
Click to expand...
He doesn't pay ANYTHING unless you squeeze it out of him like blood from a turnip.
 
Lanny said:
No, he never said Mexico would "write a check". That part's true.
However, the clear implication from what he said was that Mexico would pay for the Wall not us. This follows from everyday English language. If I knock over your mailbox with my car and tell you I'm going to pay to have it replaced what do you think that means? Does it mean that you have to pay for it and you can get the money back by some sort of business deal that enriches you at my expense or does it mean I'll write the check?
Click to expand...
If I run over your mailbox I'll go buy you a new one and install it myself.

I know English. He is saying the same thing he has said repeatedly. They'll pay for it. That is it and that's all.

Show me where he said they'll pay before we start building it and I'll concede the point.

If I were Mexico I'd tell Trump to stick it just like they already have.

I don't even know if taxing remittances would get me to pay if I were the Mexican government.

None of that matters. He thinks they're going to pay for it one way or another. Or at least he says he does.
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
If I run over your mailbox I'll go buy you a new one and install it myself.

I know English. He is saying the same thing he has said repeatedly. They'll pay for it. That is it and that's all.

Show me where he said they'll pay before we start building it and I'll concede the point.

If I were Mexico I'd tell Trump to stick it just like they already have.

I don't even know if taxing remittances would get me to pay if I were the Mexican government.

None of that matters. He thinks they're going to pay for it one way or another. Or at least he says he does.
Click to expand...
The owner of the mailbox gets to decide who replaces the mailbox within reason. In plain English, Trump said that Mexico would pay for the Wall. That doesn't mean we pay for it and he waves his magic wand to somehow get Mexico to pay us back. That's total gibberish. Run over my mailbox and I'll choose who fixes it and it won't come out of my pocket.
Don't you guys speak English?

When Mexico agrees to pay for the Wall, my major complaint will disappear. Get them to sign on the dotted line.
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
The subject should be the stupid stopgap spending bills that waste billions already. I honestly don't know when we last had a real budget, do you?
Click to expand...

Trump passed a budget in 2017 without holding federal employees hostage.

Republicans controlled ALL branches of government.

Why are we talking about this now??
Why didn't they pass funding for Trump's wall then???

This whole wall situation is nothing short of Republican evil.
 
Trump also never said Mexico would pay for the wall with...

Hookers
Tequila
Tacos
Blueberries
Empty Beer Cans
Candles
Stuffed animals
Cassette Tapes

We can go on and on about what Trump never said Mexico was going to use to pay for the wall, but that doesn't change the fact that he said they would.
 
Trump is using the new math system to pay for his wall. The math system can create revenues from nothing. It is called the progressive math system.

It was invented be Bernie Sanders. He perfected the art of creating hundreds of billions of dollars to pay for his projects.

Trump is a rookie progressive math student compared to the master Sanders.
 
dviss1 said:
Also, I'm all for the FREE WALL that Mexico was supposed to pay for.

Now people are acting like he never said Mexico was gonna pay for it.


Jesus....
Click to expand...
Ok. That was my question. So many Dems saying how horrible the wall itself is, but the Dem leaders were all for it....before
 
Mediocre Man said:
From 1996 through 2015

Obama in 06, Boxer in 09, Hillary in 2015
Click to expand...
The time is important because other more advanced measures have come available that do not include a wall.
Also, I believe the wall that Hillary supported did not run the nearly 2,000 miles that Trump is proposing.
 
Mediocre Man said:
Ok. That was my question. So many Dems saying how horrible the wall itself is, but the Dem leaders were all for it....before
Click to expand...

Trump passed a budget in 2017 without holding federal employees hostage.

Republicans controlled ALL branches of government.

Why are we talking about this now??

They could've even done it with reconciliation only requiring 50 Senate votes.

Why didn't they pass funding for Trump's wall then??
 
Lanny said:
The time is important because other more advanced measures have come available that do not include a wall.
Also, I believe the wall that Hillary supported did not run the nearly 2,000 miles that Trump is proposing.
Click to expand...
So it's distance they oppose. Got it
 
dviss1 said:
Trump passed a budget in 2017 without holding federal employees hostage.

Republicans controlled ALL branches of government.

Why are we talking about this now??

They could've even done it with reconciliation only requiring 50 Senate votes.

Why didn't they pass funding for Trump's wall then??
Click to expand...
No idea. Different topic.
 
Has anyone put all of his ridiculous "Mexico will pay" speeches together and switched it out with "USA"?

"Who will pay for the wall? USA!"

Who? USA!
 
rotary111 said:
Has anyone put all of his ridiculous "Mexico will pay" speeches together and switched it out with "USA"?

"Who will pay for the wall? USA!"

Who? USA!
Click to expand...
We don't pay for anything though. Maybe he meant we'd borrow the money from Mexico.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top