Bogus! Selective banning from selective threads of 1 or more selected posters

[MARIS61]

I've been blocked without notice from posting in certain threads, not sure how many, but the COVID one for certain.

It's been for awhile and it's something I've never seen on the board in my long time as a forum member.

I made no delete-worthy posts, broke no rules, and was never notified of the action or the reason for it.

Anyone else (that's still here) ever have such a cowardly and unfair action taken against them by the mods?

Any mod(s) want to weigh in and explain? Preferably the mod who did it.

Special rules to block special views?

 

[SlyPokerDog]

I blocked you from posting anymore in that thread because not only were you posting some pretty outrageous things, you were insulting anyone who disagreed with you. You weren't there to have a debate or exchange opinions, you were there to insult and belittle anyone who disagreed with you.

 

[julius]

This is nothing, Sly blocked me from visiting his house late at night while he's gone.

 

[MARIS61]

I blocked you from posting anymore in that thread because not only were you posting some pretty outrageous things, you were insulting anyone who disagreed with you. You weren't there to have a debate or exchange opinions, you were there to insult and belittle anyone who disagreed with you.

Show me the posts, because you are making it up. You've claimed numerous times that I have posted insults, but never can come up with examples.

As for what you consider "outrageous things", if you google those things now you will find most of them to be proven or generally accepted as commonly known facts by now. Or I can, because I rarely post anything I haven't thoroughly factchecked through numerous credible sources.

My personal knowledge and experience of COVID-19 as a victim, the healthcare industry's "response" to it, mRNA "vaccines", the people who make them, and what they do and don't do, exceeds anyone else's on this board.

You just can't handle the obvious truth about the world you live in, as usual.

You are a cowardly cur, SPD. (I believe you have granted us permission to insult you, correct me if that policy has also been changed).

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Show me the posts, because you are making it up. You've claimed numerous times that I have posted insults, but never can come up with examples.

As for what you consider "outrageous things", if you google those things now you will find most of them to be proven or generally accepted as commonly known facts by now. Or I can, because I rarely post anything I haven't thoroughly factchecked through numerous credible sources.

My personal knowledge and experience of COVID-19 as a victim, the healthcare industry's "response" to it, mRNA "vaccines", the people who make them, and what they do and don't do, exceeds anyone else's on this board.

You just can't handle the obvious truth about the world you live in, as usual.

You are a cowardly cur, SPD. (I believe you have granted us permission to insult you, correct me if that policy has also been changed).

Uh huh.

 

[SlyPokerCat]

 

[SlyPokerDog]

What does it mean to be called a cur?

If dogs understood English, they would be offended at being called a cur. When you use the word cur, you're talking about a dog that's either a mutt, very unattractive, aggressive, or all three. ​

He's obviously a cat person.

 

[julius]

Uh huh.

Well, little did we know that selling houses in beautiful central oregon now takes having knowledge of covid and mrna.

I will say tho, that posts knowledge of talking out of its ass and being full of shit exceeds every other post that has ever been posted in the history of posts.

like, take all of the porta-johns at a grateful dead concert, mixed in with the bathrooms at every chipotle, mcdonalds and burger king, multiply it by the number of dirty diapers that are created each day on the planet earth, and it still doesn't match the amount of shit that post has.

 

[ABM]

Did I miss something?

 

[Fairly-Hard]

Did I miss something?

Oh boy.

 

[Shaboid]

I'm excited to see where this goes.

 

[Chris Craig]

Banning a poster from a thread is not new and it is not something that is done hastily or precipitously. It is only done after great consideration has been given, and only when a poster ceaselessly continues to hurl insults and persists in derailing a thread.

Instead of outright banning a poster, restricting them from a thread is a preceding step, that permits for both the source of said dramas to be removed and warned, while allowing the thread to remain open and to return to it's intended topic.

We don't want to have to ban someone everytime they have a moment. We don't want to close down whole threads if we don't have to. This tool allows for a compromised action. While we could do better at informing those who are banned from a thread (those posters should be very aware of their own behaviors and why they might have resulted in such action) the mods decision to discharge a poster from a thread is neither cowardly or unfair and we are glad to be transparent about it.

Know henceforth, if you incessantly insult, troll, provocate, or any other doings that abuses other posters or derails threads, you will be subject to such action.

 

[julius]

Banning a poster from a thread is not new and it is not something that is done hastily or precipitously. It is only done after great consideration has been given, and only when a poster ceaselessly continues to hurl insults and persists in derailing a thread.

Instead of outright banning a poster, restricting them from a thread is a preceding step, that permits for both the source of said dramas to be removed and warned, while allowing the thread to remain open and to return to it's intended topic.

We don't want to have to ban someone everytime they have a moment. We don't want to close down whole threads if we don't have to. This tool allows for a compromised action. While we could do better at informing those who are banned from a thread (those posters should be very aware of their own behaviors and why they might have resulted in such action) the mods decision to discharge a poster from a thread is neither cowardly or unfair and we are glad to be transparent about it.

Know henceforth, if you incessantly insult, troll, provocate, or any other doings that abuses other posters or derails threads, you will be subject to such action.

If it becomes incessant, it should be more than just a thread ban.

 

[Chris Craig]

If it becomes incessant, it should be more than just a thread ban.

There are steps

 

[julius]

There are steps

Yeah, bUt YoU gUyS pLaY fAvOriTeS aNd NeVeR aRe CoNsIsTeNt!1!1!

 

[Natebishop3]

Yeah, bUt YoU gUyS pLaY fAvOriTeS aNd NeVeR aRe CoNsIsTeNt!1!1!

Uh oh...... I think Julius has the rona!

 

[julius]

Uh oh...... I think Julius has the rona!

your face has the rona!

 

[ABM]

Oh boy.

I'll be nice.

 

[THE HCP]

I love how nobody in @THE HCP ’s “clique” ever gets in trouble!

 

[MARIS61]

What does it mean to be called a cur?

If dogs understood English, they would be offended at being called a cur. When you use the word cur, you're talking about a dog that's either a mutt, very unattractive, aggressive, or all three. ​

He's obviously a cat person.

Are you always wrong?

Never had a cat, have had dogs by my side since birth (2 at the moment), because dogs know an honest and sincere person.

You sir, are not a dog.

 

[MARIS61]

I love how nobody in @THE HCP ’s “clique” ever gets in trouble!

Favoritism is a bitch.

 

[MARIS61]

Banning a poster from a thread is not new and it is not something that is done hastily or precipitously. It is only done after great consideration has been given, and only when a poster ceaselessly continues to hurl insults and persists in derailing a thread.

Instead of outright banning a poster, restricting them from a thread is a preceding step, that permits for both the source of said dramas to be removed and warned, while allowing the thread to remain open and to return to it's intended topic.

We don't want to have to ban someone everytime they have a moment. We don't want to close down whole threads if we don't have to. This tool allows for a compromised action. While we could do better at informing those who are banned from a thread (those posters should be very aware of their own behaviors and why they might have resulted in such action) the mods decision to discharge a poster from a thread is neither cowardly or unfair and we are glad to be transparent about it.

Know henceforth, if you incessantly insult, troll, provocate, or any other doings that abuses other posters or derails threads, you will be subject to such action.

That's nice of you to repeat that unrelated explanation of your steps of censorship, but it's not pertinent to the fact that I insulted nobody and posted nothing of an "outrageous nature" as evidenced by the refusal to present any evidence of such.

It's a pretty simple act for you to do so, unless it never happened.

It's a huge thread with about 80% unblocked now-proven disinformation, and some amusing hysteria, and amazingly I find no such posts by me in it.

Whatever. Your life, live it the way you desire. It's all good.

 

[Chris Craig]

That's nice of you to repeat that unrelated explanation of your steps of censorship, but it's not pertinent to the fact that I insulted nobody and posted nothing of an "outrageous nature" as evidenced by the refusal to present any evidence of such.

It's a pretty simple act for you to do so, unless it never happened.

It's a huge thread with about 80% unblocked now-proven disinformation, and some amusing hysteria, and amazingly I find no such posts by me in it.

Whatever. Your life, live it the way you desire. It's all good.

It was Sly who removed your posts and banned you from the thread, you will have to take that up with him. It sounds like he gave you the reasons he did so already.

You want somewhere to post all those insults we don't allow here, I hear Twitter is opening up.

 

[MARIS61]

It was Sly who removed your posts and banned you from the thread, you will have to take that up with him. It sounds like he gave you the reasons he did so already.

You want somewhere to post all those insults we don't allow here, I hear Twitter is opening up.

He did not give me reasons. He made multiple empty claims and I asked for actual examples, which as usual he cannot, or will not provide.

How is a person expected to correct alleged misbehavior if they have not to their knowledge misbehaved?

Every other person banned or blocked is told which post(s) triggered the action, so they will not repeat it and we can all have a real forum sharing individual ideas and views.

I am politely asking for SPD to afford me the same respect. Some PM's would be fine with me.

 

[Chris Craig]

He did not give me reasons. He made multiple empty claims and I asked for actual examples, which as usual he cannot, or will not provide.

How is a person expected to correct alleged misbehavior if they have not to their knowledge misbehaved?

Every other person banned or blocked is told which post(s) triggered the action, so they will not repeat it and we can all have a real forum sharing individual ideas and views.

I am politely asking for SPD to afford me the same respect. Some PM's would be fine with me.

Fine. That's for him to do if he wishes to further illucidate his reasoning.

 

[Phatguysrule]

Sly is such a bad dog...

 

[THE HCP]

Favoritism is a bitch.

Especially when its for somebody like ME. You know somebody who is so bad for this site, people have “quit because of me”. And “ a TON of people have me on IGNORE”. Just doesn’t make sense that somebody as detrimental to this site’s success would actually have a “clique” and get away with so much, when others don’t and can’t. Oh well.

 

[barfo]

have had dogs by my side since birth

That seems implausible, unless of course you are yourself a dog.

barfo

 

[ABM]

That seems implausible, unless of course you are yourself a dog.

barfo

 

[SlyPokerDog]

View attachment 47359

OMG, Maris is Micheal Jackson's son, Blanket?!?

That really explains a lot!