Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's revisiont to denigrate Shaedon because he supposedly doesn't possess this myhtical killer instict by comparing to Dame. Dame himself was not the number one option in his 88th game.
So if Shaedon hits a few game winners, he'll suddenly have this "factor" for you?
Being the first option on the first possession of the game and being the first option on the last possession of a game are not necessarily the same thing.
So let me get this straight…..So, next time Chauncey calls a play for Grant, Shaedon should blow it up demand the ball, and take an ill advised shot so we can all claim he has a killer instinct.
Billups has already made public comments about being frustrated that he's drawn up plays to get Sharpe a shot, the opportunity/mismatch was there, and Sharpe didn't attempt to take advantage.So, next time Chauncey calls a play for Grant, Shaedon should blow it up demand the ball, and take an ill advised shot so we can all claim he has a killer instinct.
Billups has already made public comments about being frustrated that he's drawn up plays to get Sharpe a shot, the opportunity/mismatch was there, and Sharpe didn't attempt to take advantage.
I'd say there is a difference between Sharpe taking ill-advised shots and turning down preferred opportunities.
Why is Billups drawing up plays for Sharpe to get a shot? That's what you do for players who can't dribble the ball, or for role players.
If Billups wants to do Sharpe a favor, get Sharpe the ball as early in a possession as possible and let Sharpe create on his own.
That Billups is drawing up plays for Sharpe makes me worry more about Billups than Sharpe.
Not sure why it’s a new concept that the team runs plays to get a favorable matchup for Sharpe. The Grizzlies rammed that down our throat to end that second game. Over and over.You can draw up a play that gets a player the ball early and allows them to create on their own off the dribble. Though a lot of people here call the "iso ball" and don't like it.ou'
Based off Billups comments, I would guess the scenario you're asking for is what happened. We got Sharpe the ball early, at a specific spot, against an specific matchup, and he didn't attack.
We should make Sharpe GM to see if he has a killer instinct.So, next time Chauncey calls a play for Grant, Shaedon should blow it up demand the ball, and take an ill advised shot so we can all claim he has a killer instinct.
No one is "denigrating" Shaeden.It's revisiont to denigrate Shaedon because he supposedly doesn't possess this myhtical killer instict by comparing to Dame. Dame himself was not the number one option in his 88th game.
So if Shaedon hits a few game winners, he'll suddenly have this "factor" for you?
i see Sharpe making the right basketball play 8 times out of 10. Also another consideration... he is currently leading the league in minutes. Kid is exhausted and can't exploit every single matchup he faces every possession. I think Chauncey's frustrations are unwarranted.Billups has already made public comments about being frustrated that he's drawn up plays to get Sharpe a shot, the opportunity/mismatch was there, and Sharpe didn't attempt to take advantage.
I'd say there is a difference between Sharpe taking ill-advised shots and turning down preferred opportunities.
i see Sharpe making the right basketball play 8 times out of 10. Also another consideration... he is currently leading the league in minutes. Kid is exhausted and can't exploit every single matchup he faces every possession. I think Chauncey's frustrations are unwarranted.
who's complaining that he's playing too much?I'm not sure my numbers track out that high, but he's had a great start. Funny the complaints for the first 82 games plus the very start of the season was that he wasn't playing enough and now he's playing too much.
Can't win!
who's complaining that he's playing too much?
People forget, both Dame and Kobe deferred early in their careers. Dame with LMA and Kobe with Shaq despite both of them being far superior players, and older than Sharpe is now. The truth is we simply don't know yet. He sure seemed to have it last year when there was no one to defer to and we've seen hints of it this season. Just as we did with Dame and Kobe. It wasn't something either one really showed super early. Jordan did though, but he's the GOAT so...I think Sharpe is driven, but being driven is not necessarily the same thing as having a killer instinct. I think Sharpe is committed to improving and working harder, but at times he defers during games and he doesn’t seem to have the same mentality that a Dame or Kobe or Jordan has/had.
People forget, both Dame and Kobe deferred early in their careers. Dame with LMA and Kobe with Shaq despite both of them being far superior players, and older than Sharpe is now. The truth is we simply don't know yet. He sure seemed to have it last year when there was no one to defer to and we've seen hints of it this season. Just as we did with Dame and Kobe. It wasn't something either one really showed super early. Jordan did though, but he's the GOAT so...
WTF?!With the Blazers, borderline all star.
When he bolts in four years, top 10 all time
Dame deferred a ton and was given the keys to the team as a Rookie, he was an extremely good ballhandler who could easily create. I haven't seen Sharpe pass up open shots, I've seen him pass often to Grant calling for it. I'd say Dame definitely deferred to LMA in many, many games. Dame also had way more time on the floor (Sharpe is only hitting Dame's first 3rd of his rookie season in total minutes) with the ball in his hands along with an excellent handle. I know Dame hit some game winners in his rookie year, but Dame is also an all time great with game winners, arguably the GOAT of that particular skill, he's certainly top 3-5 all time. Sharpe can be a Superstar and a closer without being Dame level of clutch. I don't agree with the idea that we know for certain Sharpe has no killer instinct. I think we will know by the end of this season or next at the absolute latest.I'd push back on Dame deffering in big moments early in his career. He took a handful in his rookie year alone.
And even if Sharpe isn't THAT type of player, it's ok.
Dame deferred a ton and was given the keys to the team as a Rookie, he was an extremely good ballhandler who could easily create. I haven't seen Sharpe pass up open shots, I've seen him pass often to Grant calling for it. I'd say Dame definitely deferred to LMA in many, many games. Dame also had way more time on the floor (Sharpe is only hitting Dame's first 3rd of his rookie season in total minutes) with the ball in his hands along with an excellent handle. I know Dame hit some game winners in his rookie year, but Dame is also an all time great with game winners, arguably the GOAT of that particular skill, he's certainly top 3-5 all time. Sharpe can be a Superstar and a closer without being Dame level of clutch. I don't agree with the idea that we know for certain Sharpe has no killer instinct. I think we will know by the end of this season or next at the absolute latest.
Crazy to think that when Lillard was 20 years old he was a sophomore in Ogden, Utah playing for a Big Sky school and no one outside of Weber State fans knew a damn thing about him.
Sharpe at 20 is averaging 20, in the league with the big boys.
You guys are interpreting what I’m saying differently than what I mean. Yes, Dame took a back seat to LMA in the offense as a whole, but when the game was on the line who took the last shot? Dame had a number of game winners in his first, second, and third seasons in the league and this is what I’m talking about. When the Blazers were in the middle of that insane drought where the grizzlies were going 26-2 or whatever it was, Dame would have wanted the ball. Kobe would have wanted the ball. Roy would have wanted the ball. Does Shaedon have that? I think that Shae will end up being the better player overall, but I have a feeling that Scoot might end up being that dude that wants the ball. Just a feeling, based on their personalities.Dame deferred a ton and was given the keys to the team as a Rookie, he was an extremely good ballhandler who could easily create. I haven't seen Sharpe pass up open shots, I've seen him pass often to Grant calling for it. I'd say Dame definitely deferred to LMA in many, many games. Dame also had way more time on the floor (Sharpe is only hitting Dame's first 3rd of his rookie season in total minutes) with the ball in his hands along with an excellent handle. I know Dame hit some game winners in his rookie year, but Dame is also an all time great with game winners, arguably the GOAT of that particular skill, he's certainly top 3-5 all time. Sharpe can be a Superstar and a closer without being Dame level of clutch. I don't agree with the idea that we know for certain Sharpe has no killer instinct. I think we will know by the end of this season or next at the absolute latest.
Who was the veteran that was trying to take shots away from Dame, Kobe, or Jordan? You could argue Shaq with Kobe, but not really...I think Sharpe is driven, but being driven is not necessarily the same thing as having a killer instinct. I think Sharpe is committed to improving and working harder, but at times he defers during games and he doesn’t seem to have the same mentality that a Dame or Kobe or Jordan has/had.
The Lakers were waaaaaay more stacked than our crappy roster. So was the Blazers when Dame got here. But again, I’m talking about at the end of games.Who was the veteran that was trying to take shots away from Dame, Kobe, or Jordan? You could argue Shaq with Kobe, but not really...
Sharpe has Brogdon, Grant, and Simons, all who want to bring the ball up the court and have the ball in their hands the whole possession.
I didn't see Dame deferring to Aldridge... He created a ton for Aldridge. Getting Aldridge the ball in the post isn't "deferring to Aldridge". That's playing team basketball. It makes it easier for Dame (and the rest of the team) to get buckets. Same as getting the ball to Shaq wouldn't be Kobe deferring to Shaq.Dame deferred a ton and was given the keys to the team as a Rookie, he was an extremely good ballhandler who could easily create. I haven't seen Sharpe pass up open shots, I've seen him pass often to Grant calling for it. I'd say Dame definitely deferred to LMA in many, many games. Dame also had way more time on the floor (Sharpe is only hitting Dame's first 3rd of his rookie season in total minutes) with the ball in his hands along with an excellent handle. I know Dame hit some game winners in his rookie year, but Dame is also an all time great with game winners, arguably the GOAT of that particular skill, he's certainly top 3-5 all time. Sharpe can be a Superstar and a closer without being Dame level of clutch. I don't agree with the idea that we know for certain Sharpe has no killer instinct. I think we will know by the end of this season or next at the absolute latest.
That's kind of my point. We have comparably "crappy" players in Brogdon, Grant, and Simons demanding the ball at the end of games.The Lakers were waaaaaay more stacked than our crappy roster. So was the Blazers when Dame got here. But again, I’m talking about at the end of games.
I agree 100%. People shun the Kobe comparison because they remember the 5 rings but forget he averaged like 8ppg off the bench as a rookie. I think he’s shown all the potential to be Kobe the player so far, without signs he’s developing into Kobe the teammate, which is great.I look at Kobe's stats since he didn't play college ball either. It's not sacrilegious to compare him to Kobe the HOF'er as Drexler is also a HOF'er. I like how Sharpe stacks up. I think Sharpe is really a team player at heart. He won't do hero ball just for the sake of it. He passes, he boards and he plays defense.