Natebishop3
Don't tread on me!
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 94,328
- Likes
- 57,641
- Points
- 113
Does changing the starting lineup fix anything at this point? Or do our problems run much deeper than that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Miller starting over Blake would fix everything.
Miller starting over Blake would fix everything.
He certainly didn't do what people thought he was so good at. Namely, feed it repeatedly to Oden or push the temp.
I don't think he's given license to push the tempo. I think he's generally been good at getting the ball to Oden, even if he missed a couple of opportunities tonight.
Well, I don't know about that tonight. Nate was practically screaming on the sidelines in the 4th to push the ball, but he still trotted it up.

For all the talk Nate has about "pushing the ball' and "running", how the team plays sure seems to directly and absolutely contradict that.
If he wants them to push, why does he start mr anti-fastbreak himself, Steve Blake?
I was talking specifically about the 4th quarter, where Nate was screaming on the sidelines. Since some people seem to think all Nate has to say is "Push the ball" and we suddenly become a fast break team.
Roy is a big part of the reason why we don't run. It's not just Blake. When your best player, and more importantly he happens to be a wing, does run you're pretty much going to suck on the break.
Roy is a great one-on-one player (not recently), but he really suck at playing off the ball and pushing the tempo.
Agreed. Roy has openly admitted that he likes to play at his own pace. He has said that coaches have implored him to run in the past, but he doesn't like to speed up. Roy isn't a runner. He's a half-court guy. I wouldn't blame it all on Roy, but I think he is a major factor in our pace.
For 80 fridgin' MILLION dollars, you'd think he'd be somewhat adaptable?
It would be amusing if Nate benches GO for Joel. Then if that doesn't work, he benches LaMarcus for Dante/Howard. Would be hilarious. Disturbingly enough, I could see Nate benches both LaMarcus and GO before he put Blake where he belongs... on the bench.

Either start Andre or get him outta here. While it would be interesting and possibly beneficial to start him and let him actually run the team, I think the best option is to ship him away. Roy doesn't want to play with him and the PG position is really not an issue on our team (Blake and Bayless are perfectly serviceable next to Roy). We need another scorer. Someone who is going to make up for the loss of Outlaw, either to start in Webster's place or come off the bench. After December 15th, we should trade Miller for this guy. Someone who won't need the ball in his hands constantly to be effective. Let Roy handpick the guy. So much gets solved this way:
1) Blake can relax and know that the PG position is his. He doesn't have to look over his shoulder. He'll play better.
2) Bayless finally gets real minutes at backup PG. With Sergio being sent out, Bayless was ready to take on that role and then suddenly, we bring in Miller like a slap in the face to all of Bayless' hard work.
3) Brandon Roy is finally happy, can take charge of the team, and control the pace of the game, something that was considered one of his strengths from coaches and players around the league earlier in his career (y'know, back when he was winning Player of the Week awards?)
4) New player takes some scoring pressure off Roy when needed. Essentially, this new player is the new Travis Outlaw.
5) Finally, it begins to feel like "last year" again. And we get out of the first round this time because LMA & Roy are more experienced and Oden has improved. Plus, New Player delivers that extra punch of scoring that Travis failed to last spring.
And there. Everything's back to normal in Blazer land. No worries. Blake has shown that he can get the ball to Oden. In fact, it is Blake who has set up Oden for more wide open dunks than any other player on the team including Miller.
This would make me happy. Thoughts?
Ship him out for what?.
Any available scorer. Fuckin Turkoglu would be really great to have now, but ah well. Who else could we get? Work the phones, KP. Get us the guy who will restore chemistry.
If Miller goes, I'm in favor of starting Roy at point guard and moving Rudy into the starting five. Blake doesn't deserve to start right now.
I'm not opposed to trading Miller (or anyone) for the right deal, but this isn't the way to go. It's basically placing all our problems on Miller. Miller is not responsible for Roy not being able to get around his man anymore. Miller is not the reason for Blake bricking shots after shots. If the reason Blake is bricking shots is because he's looking over his shoulders, then that's on Blake.
Getting rid of Miller ain't going to solve shit. How 'bout Nate taking his head out of his ass and play the better players more minutes? And get rid of the idiotic 2 fouls rule.
This would make me happy. Thoughts?
It would be amusing if Nate benches GO for Joel. Then if that doesn't work, he benches LaMarcus for Dante/Howard. Would be hilarious. Disturbingly enough, I could see Nate benches both LaMarcus and GO before he put Blake where he belongs... on the bench.
I'm not opposed to trading Miller (or anyone) for the right deal, but this isn't the way to go. It's basically placing all our problems on Miller. Miller is not responsible for Roy not being able to get around his man anymore. Miller is not the reason for Blake bricking shots after shots. If the reason Blake is bricking shots is because he's looking over his shoulders, then that's on Blake.
Getting rid of Miller ain't going to solve shit.
