Politics Tara Reade

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Lanny said:
I've NEVER seen anyone in here post anything like that. Perhaps you could bring up an example with the thread and the number of the offending post.
Click to expand...
I will. on my phone about to head back out to the garden. :)
 
Orion Bailey said:
I will. on my phone about to head back out to the garden. :)
Click to expand...
Garden? I love to tend to a vegetable garden. My current home has precious little space for vegetable gardening. We've squeezed in six tomato plants, a slicing cucumber plant, some Korean perilla leaf plants used for making a delicious mint like kim chee, a raspberry bush, Korean hot pepper plant and a Korean egg plant. Wish to the high heaven that we could grow more like we used to.
Please continue to show us pictures of your garden, they brighten my days.
 
julius said:
I'm talking about feeble minded people period. Although I have no proof, and I'm sure anecdotal proof will be posted once I post this, I would bet that they get tricked at a higher rate than those who are more educated and intellectual.
Click to expand...

Anecdotal is correct. And it looks liked nobody swooped in to back you up, so you still have no proof.

Your hypothesis that maybe, just maybe, stupid people are easier to trick than smart people is really compelling. Well done. I think you may be onto something.

Now the only task at hand is to prove that everyone who disagrees with you is dumber than you. That really is the gist of what you’re saying, isn’t it? That one's not quite as easy to prove.
 
jonnyboy said:
Anecdotal is correct. And it looks liked nobody swooped in to back you up, so you still have no proof.

Your hypothesis that maybe, just maybe, stupid people are easier to trick than smart people is really compelling. Well done. I think you may be onto something.

Now the only task at hand is to prove that everyone who disagrees with you is dumber than you. That really is the gist of what you’re saying, isn’t it? That one's not quite as easy to prove.
Click to expand...

no, the jist of it was that stupid people are gullible. Has nothing to do with whether or not someone agrees with me or not. That's called projection on your part.
 
The idea that Reade's claim is full of holes is not only compelling...it's also factual.

Edit; FIFM and FIF-eblazer.
 
Last edited:
julius said:
no, the jist of it was that stupid people are gullible. Has nothing to do with whether or not someone agrees with me or not. That's called projection on your part.
Click to expand...
The dumb and the greedy are the most easily conned. Don't believe me? Just ask Trump.
 
Lanny said:
The dumb and the greedy are the most easily conned. Don't believe me? Just ask Trump.
Click to expand...

While I agree that there are a lot of Trump backers who are easily duped, or quick to pass on a meme/email/conspiracy, the same is true of those who are not backers of Trump. Maybe not to the same degree, mind you, but there are many people who feel more comfortable making quick and easy statements that sound important/intelligent.

It's much easier to surround yourself with similar minded thoughts, so you don't have to run the risk of finding out you were wrong. And if someone else then tells you that you are wrong, it's difficult to take that new information from outside of your bubble. So people will double down on their belief systems.

Everyone can point out examples of the "other side" doing it, and use that as proof their side doesn't. Hell, I kind of did in this very post.

Stupid people are just that, stupid people. If people want to take it as a slight against Trump voters, and they're a Trump supporter, that's on them.


I hate people falling for stupid shit regardless of their political/religious affiliation.
 
julius said:
While I agree that there are a lot of Trump backers who are easily duped, or quick to pass on a meme/email/conspiracy, the same is true of those who are not backers of Trump. Maybe not to the same degree, mind you, but there are many people who feel more comfortable making quick and easy statements that sound important/intelligent.

It's much easier to surround yourself with similar minded thoughts, so you don't have to run the risk of finding out you were wrong. And if someone else then tells you that you are wrong, it's difficult to take that new information from outside of your bubble. So people will double down on their belief systems.

Everyone can point out examples of the "other side" doing it, and use that as proof their side doesn't. Hell, I kind of did in this very post.

Stupid people are just that, stupid people. If people want to take it as a slight against Trump voters, and they're a Trump supporter, that's on them.


I hate people falling for stupid shit regardless of their political/religious affiliation.
Click to expand...


Kinda reminds me of this...

http://www.sportstwo.com/posts/4941457/
 
...so much for her "education". and her "being bright"
 
Last edited:
jonnyboy said:
Iron.
Click to expand...

1567166260.jpg
 
riverman said:
book deal money....they really don't want to actually have a job...
Click to expand...
I was referring to the false info she put on her resume back in the day, to get the Biden job. Sounds like she lied to get a job.

Hell, I’d probably do it if I thought I could get away with it. It’s rough out there. Pretty soon you’re going to have to have a college degree to flip hamburgers. Burgerology or some shit. I feel like colleges now days have a degree for every ridiculous activity you could think of and the knuckleheads of the world are making it a precedent. Bar tending degree....gimme a fucking break.

That was a rant.
 
jonnyboy said:
I was referring to the false info she put on her resume back in the day, to get the Biden job. Sounds like she lied to get a job.

Hell, I’d probably do it if I thought I could get away with it. It’s rough out there. Pretty soon you’re going to have to have a college degree to flip hamburgers. Burgerology or some shit. I feel like colleges now days have a degree for every ridiculous activity you could think of and the knuckleheads of the world are making it a precedent. Bar tending degree....gimme a fucking break.

That was a rant.
Click to expand...

Two things:

1. Bar tending degree?? is that a thing??

and

2. Am I the only one who, when I see an alert (etc) on here, who instantly goes "wait...what did I say?" Because I'll see that someone quoted me (like @jonnyboy did here) and I'm like "shit...am I in the middle of an argument again?"
 
jonnyboy said:
I was referring to the false info she put on her resume back in the day, to get the Biden job. Sounds like she lied to get a job.

Hell, I’d probably do it if I thought I could get away with it. It’s rough out there. Pretty soon you’re going to have to have a college degree to flip hamburgers. Burgerology or some shit. I feel like colleges now days have a degree for every ridiculous activity you could think of and the knuckleheads of the world are making it a precedent. Bar tending degree....gimme a fucking break.

That was a rant.
Click to expand...
understand your rant, problem in her case it may open up for lawsuits and or criminal prosecutions to be set aside. certainly can't be argued she was somehow serving justice.
and concerning her testimony, she lied about her qualifications while under oath
 
jonnyboy said:
To get a job.
Click to expand...

Touche, but I meant more about why people will lie on a grand scale. Like, "I have an undergraduate degree from U of P" which isn't terribly difficult to find out.

If I'm asked if I enjoy working in groups (I hate that), and I say I do...that's a little less important.
 
lawai'a said:
Tara Reade’s lawyer drops her as a client
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/elections-2020/tara-reades-lawyer-drops-her-as-a-client/ar-BB14t7b0
Click to expand...

It seems the more this person speaks out, the holes are exposed. Being a witness is all about credibility and it seems this person has lied and/or defrauded several times which lends to little or no credibility. This paragraph is particularly disturbing,

Reade testified in at least two court cases that she graduated from Antioch University in Seattle with a bachelor’s degree. The school, however, said she only attended for three quarters and did not graduate. When Reade offered a different explanation on Thursday evening, saying she had a special arrangement with a former chancellor using a different name, university officials told POLITICO that was not true. CNN first reported questions about the inconsistencies in her educational background.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Featured content

Back
Top