Politics Tara Reade

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Why is this thread still going. Tara Reade was so yesterday
 
I see. In other words, they're lying. Gotcha.
 
ABM said:
There's nothing in the world that's "so yesterday." Not in this day and age.
Click to expand...
Tara Reade is yesterday because her story is so full of holes and thoroughly debunked. I say let's move on to something important.
 
Lanny said:
Tara Reade is yesterday because her story is so full of holes and thoroughly debunked. I say let's move on to something important.
Click to expand...

I only brought it up because, apparently, there are groups still considering her story. We shall see, though. At any rate, stuff gets dredged up in these parts all of the time. Nothing new there.

But, yeah, her story will most likely continue to stay under wraps.
 
Lanny said:
Tara Reade is yesterday because her story is so full of holes and thoroughly debunked. I say let's move on to something important.
Click to expand...

I'm sure there's another accuser they will strum up and throw out there.
 
ABM said:
There's nothing in the world that's "so yesterday." Not in this day and age.
Click to expand...
The British Empire...American Slavery.....The Black Plague....The Irish Potato Famine....c'mon dude.....Kennedy Assasination…Trump becoming president .I could go on...history does not have to repeat itself...there are still groups who think the Holocaust never happened or the moon landing...how many of these groups keep you in "reasonable doubt" mode?
 
riverman said:
The British Empire...American Slavery.....The Black Plague....The Irish Potato Famine....c'mon dude.....Kennedy Assasination…Trump becoming president .I could go on...history does not have to repeat itself...there are still groups who think the Holocaust never happened or the moon landing...how many of these groups keep you in "reasonable doubt" mode?
Click to expand...

You missed my point. In this day and age of the internet, smart phone cameras/vids, etc., new stuff gets brought up and reintroduced all the time. Especially in this joint. That said, I don't view something that was being discussed only weeks ago as being yesterday's news.
 
ABM said:
You missed my point. In this day and age of the internet, smart phone cameras/vids, etc., new stuff gets brought up and reintroduced all the time. Especially in this joint. That said, I don't view something that was being discussed only weeks ago as being yesterday's news.
Click to expand...
cell phones? I'm addressing the reasonable doubt defense you allude to....this story has been clearly debunked....you think cell phones will get the cop in Minnesota a different defense? Scientific method relies on demonstrability which is the point I'm making...I got the point you were trying to make...and expounded upon it...the lady is an ambulance chaser with a history of ambulance chasing and two stories depending upon who gives her 50k for an interview...pay for play in an election year when big bucks will buy sensationalized attacks on the opponent
 
riverman said:
cell phones? I'm addressing the reasonable doubt defense you allude to....this story has been clearly debunked....you think cell phones will get the cop in Minnesota a different defense? Scientific method relies on demonstrability which is the point I'm making...I got the point you were trying to make...and expounded upon it...the lady is an ambulance chaser with a history of ambulance chasing and two stories depending upon who gives her 50k for an interview...pay for play in an election year when big bucks will buy sensationalized attacks on the opponent
Click to expand...

LOL. No, I'm alluding to the "yesterday's news" comment. As to the nature of my other post, I was only pointing out that some groups are still considering her story. Mainly, the college campus cats. One might conclude (as yank seemed to) that the report if coming from a right-slanted source. But, does that mean they're trotting out lies?
 
ABM said:
LOL. No, I'm alluding to the "yesterday's news" comment. As to the nature of my other post, I was only pointing out that some groups are still considering her story. Mainly, the college campus cats. One might conclude (as yank seemed to) that the report if coming from a right-slanted source. But, does that mean they're trotting out lies?
Click to expand...

Usually.........
 
ABM said:
But, does that mean they're trotting out lies?
Click to expand...
I've answered this...don't know why you'd keep putting it out there...she's been clearly debunked so lies are what you'll find if you want to look for fabrications and spin that help bring down Joe..if you think the GOP doesn't have a ton of money to support shit like this, welcome to campaign strategy 101
 
riverman said:
I've answered this...don't know why you'd keep putting it out there...she's been clearly debunked so lies are what you'll find if you want to look for fabrications and spin that help bring down Joe..if you think the GOP doesn't have a ton of money to support shit like this, welcome to campaign strategy 101
Click to expand...

Here was my post. I made an observation. So what?

http://www.sportstwo.com/posts/4953987/
 
riverman said:
you don't need to stutter, I've read the thread ABM...and you're playing the reasonable doubt spin...I'm here to debunk that ...so what? this thread is not valid from a real news standpoint anymore...I thought fake news was important to you guys?
Click to expand...

No, I'm simply point out that, at least in some college circles, Biden is still being potentially doubted. Perfectly legitimate.
 
riverman said:
you don't need to stutter, I've read the thread ABM...and you're playing the reasonable doubt spin...I'm here to debunk that ...so what? this thread is not valid from a real news standpoint anymore...I thought fake news was important to you guys?
Click to expand...

It is important for them. The dunce in chief feeds them beautiful, wonderful fake news everyday, and they need everyone to enjoy it just as much as they do - they are really delicate flowers that need a lot of affirmation.
 
riverman said:
cell phones? I'm addressing the reasonable doubt defense you allude to....this story has been clearly debunked....you think cell phones will get the cop in Minnesota a different defense? Scientific method relies on demonstrability which is the point I'm making...I got the point you were trying to make...and expounded upon it...the lady is an ambulance chaser with a history of ambulance chasing and two stories depending upon who gives her 50k for an interview...pay for play in an election year when big bucks will buy sensationalized attacks on the opponent
Click to expand...
i would like to point out also that the SCIENCE is always subjective to many on this forum especially as lately the message coming out of the white house is "who ya going to believe, ME or your lying eyes"
 
andalusian said:
It is important for them. The dunce in chief feeds them beautiful, wonderful fake news everyday, and they need everyone to enjoy it just as much as they do - they are really delicate flowers that need a lot of affirmation.
Click to expand...

hmm, I kind of look at them like weeds that needs the weed whacker taken to them. :bgrin:
 
ABM said:
You missed my point. In this day and age of the internet, smart phone cameras/vids, etc., new stuff gets brought up and reintroduced all the time. Especially in this joint. That said, I don't view something that was being discussed only weeks ago as being yesterday's news.
Click to expand...
Anything profoundly proven false is yesterday news and time to move on to the next in an endless line of conspiracy theories.
 
Lanny said:
Anything profoundly proven false is yesterday news and time to move on to the next in an endless line of conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...

OK, Lanny.
 
Won't the Tara Reade thing ever die?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Featured content

Back
Top