Natebishop3
Don't tread on me!
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 94,169
- Likes
- 57,378
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've seen a BKN fan on Twitter saying that getting Mikal Bridges would require Sharpe, Simons, the pick, and 3/4 other frp. I didn't know he was the second coming of MJ
1. You are REALLY overestimating Ants valueSure, but come on.
I meant that in the sense of if Bridges can bring back a recent lottery pick, a top 5 pick, and an efficient 25 ppg lead guard, then Dame can bring back a shit ton more.
I've also seen a Blazer fan in a forum saying getting Mikal Bridges would require Nas Little, Keon Johnson, and 3/4 srp
This is gunna be BIG summer, we will see some earth-shattering moves. Mikal is only an appetizer
Brooklyn fan is really delusional. Mikal Bridges is a great 2 way role player. He's not Kevin Durant.I've seen a BKN fan on Twitter saying that getting Mikal Bridges would require Sharpe, Simons, the pick, and 3/4 other frp. I didn't know he was the second coming of MJ
I think everyone is gonna be mighty disappointed come next November, if we aren’t trading Dame we really don’t have the ammo to go out and improve. I fully expect basically the same roster plus whoever we pick. Cronin will play it off that the value wasn’t there to trade the pick. My guess is we try to build through the draft while saving face saying we tried to pull this and that trade until Dame finally asks for a trade in his age 34/35 season bringing us back very little in compensation. Better hope we hit number 1 this year.
The Blazers do have ammo. They will open up access to their future draft capital, plus have potentially a top 5 pick this year. Add in a very good Anfernee Simons, and that should net you 2 very good talents in return on the low side . And that's with not getting the #1 pick Wemby . Unless you're saying Simons isn't that valuable. If that's the case, why would the Blazers want to keep him at all anyways. I think Simons is a very good player but redundant here.I think everyone is gonna be mighty disappointed come next November, if we aren’t trading Dame we really don’t have the ammo to go out and improve. I fully expect basically the same roster plus whoever we pick. Cronin will play it off that the value wasn’t there to trade the pick. My guess is we try to build through the draft while saving face saying we tried to pull this and that trade until Dame finally asks for a trade in his age 34/35 season bringing us back very little in compensation. Better hope we hit number 1 this year.
The Blazers do have ammo. They will open up access to their future draft capital, plus have potentially a top 5 pick this year. Add in a very good Anfernee Simons, and that should net you 2 very good talents in return on the low side . And that's with not getting the #1 pick Wemby . Unless you're saying Simons isn't that valuable. If that's the case, why would the Blazers want to keep him at all anyways. I think Simons is a very good player but redundant here.
It seems like he's forcing us out of purgatory. He's saying get another bonafide star at a position of need, upgrade this roster so it's the best I've played on and we'll be cool. Obviously that implies that if the team can't that they should trade him. So we're either going into a youth rebuild or we're trading away every other draft pick for the foreseeable future so we have a legit chance at a title over the next few years.So sad Dame is basically forcing purgatory
There are ways to keep Dame and still contend. 29 other teams in the NBA will not devalue known currency like draft picks because they can force Dame out to a different team, that makes no fucking sense. Half of the teams in the league are making win now moves. The fact that every GM knows that we are either going to make win now moves or trade Dame does not weaken our position.Funny thing is, Dame can't make a trade. He can talk to his buddies, ask them to come to Portland and play with him. Even if they were free agents, we can't sign them. Dame makes soooo much. Can't trade for them because other teams know we HAVE to overpay and that is foolish. Portland is only gonna succeed using the OKC model, draft, draft a lot, and know what the hell it is you are drafting. It' s how we got Dame.
We’ll be what, 6-10 seed next year best case?It seems like he's forcing us out of purgatory. He's saying get another bonafide star at a position of need, upgrade this roster so it's the best I've played on and we'll be cool. Obviously that implies that if the team can't that they should trade him. So we're either going into a youth rebuild or we're trading away every other draft pick for the foreseeable future so we have a legit chance at a title over the next few years.
Both of the results of Dame really pushing the team the hardest he ever has are the team not being in purgatory.
We’ll be what, 6-10 seed next year best case?
When Dame is 34?Stepping stone to contention hopefully.
When Dame is 34?
No reason for them to trade for Dame if they're giving up Siakam. Those two belong together, whether here or there.Okay, Siakam/OG for Dame/Ant
Scoot/Sharpe/OG/Siakam/Nurk.....better than what we had 3 out of the last 4 years, even with the youth.
1. You are REALLY overestimating Ants value
2. Sharpe is tantalizing, but that’s all he is at this point
Still Pass. Enjoy the Dame ride. We all hope Shaedon is a generational talent as well. And if he is, It will make Joe's job, and Dame's desires , easier to achieve. I'm gonna live in the now, tomorrow isn't a given. Especially at 59.
Dame is great wife material in this scenerio. He's hot, loyal, and brings the goods. It's the kids, and the In laws, that are destroying the relationship.
Using a player as an example whoCP3's almost 38.
Never agreed with you moreIn sports projecting young players is huge to teams. I’m pretty sure the consensus is that Sharpe is going to be really special among GM’s. He’s still 19.
That said Cronin would have to be an idiot to trade Sharpe.
If I had to choose between Lillard and Sharpe, taking into account their age. I’d take Sharpe EASILY.
The only way we’ll win a championship with Lillard imo is by getting a player better than him at this stage in his career. And that ain’t happening.
Lillard’s decline, whether it be gradual or sudden, is just around the corner.
People here bitch incessantly about Nurks deal but would be ok with Duncan Robinson's contract? One pick is not enough incentive to take that on, and we give up Dame? I dont think we are close to getting the kinda value we should be getting.