- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 34,376
- Likes
- 43,820
- Points
- 113
Would it be overzealous moderating for me to just change those to "mugged"?Maybe a different choice of words...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would it be overzealous moderating for me to just change those to "mugged"?Maybe a different choice of words...
He was just hiding in a heart shaped box for more than weeks?!@Wizard Mentor is Kurt Cobain, I knew his death was a hoax!
Unlikely. Detroit probably valued Snell as a player too.The 30th pick cleared 4M for Milwaukee this year. 12M next year. 16M total but most of the savings are deferred.
Could 25 move Turner's 18M this year?
According to sites that track that sort of thing we haven't had any cash in or out this year so we still have the full $5+ million to send out.Heat just pid 1.88 million for the 44th pick, have we maxed out our outgoing cash for the year yet?
Hit up Philly, Olshey.According to sites that track that sort of thing we haven't had any cash in or out this year so we still have the full $5+ million to send out.
Dennis was solid but he isn't a really efficient player , but definetly one of the better 6th mans in the leagueWho is going to be OKC’s starting center? And that German with the bleach spot played damn well for them last season.
70% = 70%.
You act with certainty that isnt there.
How enjoyable is this.
Every time I see Pelinka I think.Is that Pelinka? It looks like Rob Lowe on "Parks and Rec."
This is why I have a problem with Rich Paul being involved in all this. It is in Paul's and Davis' best interest to take the 4.1 mil trade kicker and tell Pelinka to kick rocks if asked to waive it. But the conflict of interest of repping Bron means that he prolly wants Davis to waive it.
I have no doubt that the plan is to compensate him for his work on Space Jam 2 to make up for the trade kicker which AD will waive. It's total bullshit.This is why I have a problem with Rich Paul being involved in all this. It is in Paul's and Davis' best interest to take the 4.1 mil trade kicker and tell Pelinka to kick rocks if asked to waive it. But the conflict of interest of repping Bron means that he prolly wants Davis to waive it.
Just wrong on so many levels.
And if LA lands a third max player, it would effectively de-value the picks they got from LA in return. Ridiculous for LA to even broach the idea of going back to re-do the trade now.I'm going to be pissed if the Pelicans give in and let the Lakers wait until July 30th. There is absolutely no reason from their perspective to do that. The Lakers agreed to a trade and shouldn't be allowed to change the parameters because they didn't have the foresight to plan ahead.
This is why I have a problem with Rich Paul being involved in all this. It is in Paul's and Davis' best interest to take the 4.1 mil trade kicker and tell Pelinka to kick rocks if asked to waive it. But the conflict of interest of repping Bron means that he prolly wants Davis to waive it.
Just wrong on so many levels.
Guys have declined money before to give their team cap space. I get that's an interesting relationship for Rich Paul because he's been best friends with Lebron most of his life, but if he's not acting in Davis' interest why wouldn't Davis fire him?This is why I have a problem with Rich Paul being involved in all this. It is in Paul's and Davis' best interest to take the 4.1 mil trade kicker and tell Pelinka to kick rocks if asked to waive it. But the conflict of interest of repping Bron means that he prolly wants Davis to waive it.
Just wrong on so many levels.
I do. Because it is a form of collusion and makes the discrepancy between market advantages even bigger.Who cares? Like really... Who really gives a shit? Y'all are making a big deal out of nothing.
I do. Because it is a form of collusion and makes the discrepancy between market advantages even bigger.
You mean like when Boogie didn't come here because he and Nurk were repped by the same agent and it was a conflict of interest for both sides?No it doesn't. I'd bet it happens all the time when an agent has 2 clients on the same team.
You mean like when Boogie didn't come here because he and Nurk were repped by the same agent and it was a conflict of interest for both sides?
It's messed up.It wasn't really. You could look at it both ways. I'm sure Nurk had something to say about it and spoke to his agent to make sure it didn't happen.
The same way Lebron could speak to his agent and say hey try and get him on the team or we need that 4 mil.
Again, this shit happens all the time.
People are just now up in arms about it.
You mean like when Boogie didn't come here because he and Nurk were repped by the same agent and it was a conflict of interest for both sides?
It isn't the same. That's what I'm saying. What happened with Nurk/Boogie/agent is what normally happens when there's a conflict of interest.How is that even remotely the same?
They both play the same position. They both need minutes. They both are starters. Putting them both on the same team benefits neither of them as they would harm their numbers and receive worse contracts in return.
And it sucks for them because they are both plodding big centers. It’s not like you can just put DMC by nurk like you could AD.
People get all up in their feelings about LeBron, Lakers and Rich Paul now.