Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you mean like drawing a red line and then doing nothing about it? if given the choice between those options, i prefer the one where action backs up statements. Now I'm sure they'd like to get to a point where they can do things and then talk about it. But lets face it, the dithering wussified policies of the last 8 years has emboldened our enemies and he's got to bluster and if necessary pound the shit out of them if they call the bluff. any attempt to criticize ow this was handled is just looking for an excuse to bitch at something that shouldn't be itched at. Frankly I'd offer to extradite Kerry to the Hague for the crime of not getting all the chemical weapons like he assured the world he had.^^^the missiles were directed at and limited to airports only, and putting craters in the runways of the airports and/or destroying the fuel depot and hangers will hopefully prevent the planes which dropped the nerve gas bombs from taking off.
...but again, all of Trump's actions would likely be more effective if he'd stop shooting his mouth off about what he intends to do ahead of time.
you mean like drawing a red line and then doing nothing about it? if given the choice between those options, i prefer the one where action backs up statements. Now I'm sure they'd like to get to a point where they can do things and then talk about it. But lets face it, the dithering wussified policies of the last 8 years has emboldened our enemies and he's got to bluster and if necessary pound the shit out of them if they call the bluff. any attempt to criticize ow this was handled is just looking for an excuse to bitch at something that shouldn't be itched at. Frankly I'd offer to extradite Kerry to the Hague for the crime of not getting all the chemical weapons like he assured the world he had.






...Yup...Russia is pissed...but hey, they're our "friends", right?

...and oh, ...memo to Mike Lee and those like you, sorry, but no, Trumps does not have to consult Congress... because you SOBs can neither agree on the color of shit nor keep a secret.
Template public:_media_site_embed_youtube not found. Try rebuilding or reinstalling the s9e/MediaSites add-on.
Pretty sure Russians have tried to meddle in our elections ever since the end of WW2. Messing with the sovereignty of the enemy is done in all sorts of ways. This is business as usual, just takes on a whole new element in the electronic/internet age especially when fuckers like Snowden gave that enemy the keys to the liquor cabinet. Personally I think Obama, Hillary and Trump have all been played by the Ruskies to various degrees. I don't think it intentional, I think our politicians are just that fucking naive.
As to the strikes, more symbolism than anything else at this point in time. We'll see what else becomes of it. The reactions have been interesting. Below is the latest G-File from Jonah at NRO, Ron and Rob I think you'll find a lot that you like in this piece.
http://www.nationalreview.com/g-file/446552/trump-syria-strike-obama-red-line-enforced
...I doubt the Ruskies have ever interfered with our elections to the degree and with as much vigor and probably not as much effectiveness as the last election.
And that's likely because Snowden worked for Obamas NSA and do you doubt that Obama was spying on foreign leaders and not Team Clinton too? No coincidence that the Russians knew how to get to team Hillary because Snowden probably knew who was vulnerable. Trump as an outsider likely wasn't in that data file of politicians and generally corporate folks have better comsec.
The moment the left realizes this is all because of Obamas watergate tendencies we will see the left drop this issue as old news.
I can't imagine Putin being too happy with Nikki Haleys speech at the UN where she painted them into the complicit or fucking stupid corner. Absolutely brilliant.
The hawks got 59 hard-ons, and Trump got to embarrass the Russians while having dinner with the Chinese president. Speaking of the latter, he also had to know that Trump hard just sent a carrier group to park off the cost of North Korea. Fucking coincidence? lol!

Rob can expand on this with a novella post, but from my perspective:
Raining Tomahawks down on that base served the point of reminding Assad and his Russian and Iranian partners that American munitions (conventional or otherwise) are never more than a heartbeart away. The cost of this strike, roughly $60M in missiles is a whole lot cheaper that potentially losing a single fighter/bomber or flight crew. The Tomahawk program, which Obama tried to cut, just got a reorder for $60M to Raytheon which does in fact preserve/create jobs.
So lets add up the value gained from reminding our enemies not to fuck with WMDs, the boost it gives to our allies (especially Israel, Jordan, Saudi, etc), the congrats of the UN and international community, no Americans lives lost, domestic job stimulation and more operational experience to the sailors that executed the strike. I'm not seeing any downside here at all. The non-intervention crowd has the assurance the position hasn't changed, just the calculus. The hawks got 59 hard-ons, and Trump got to embarrass the Russians while having dinner with the Chinese president. Speaking of the latter, he also had to know that Trump hard just sent a carrier group to park off the cost of North Korea. Fucking coincidence? lol!



well now you know there was no coincidence on the use of 59 missiles. This was done to flood the google search engine optimization and hide this thread. I think your starting to get under Trumps skin, lol!...^^^took it as a compliment at first... till I reread that part a couple of times to finally comprehend it in it's intended context.![]()
![]()
well now you know there was no coincidence on the use of 59 missiles. This was done to flood the google search engine optimization and hide this thread. I think your starting to get under Trumps skin, lol!


