OT Tucker Carlson's Show: Maybe The Most Racist In Cable History

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
ABM said:
Dude, the operative word here is previously. LOL. And, yes, I did read the article.
Click to expand...
And yet fail to bring up points you disagree with from it at all.
 
ABM said:
When the whole immigration "system" is a sham, well.....
Click to expand...

He was claiming that legal immigrants were shitting in the streets of a town near where he lived. But if you had read the article you would have known this.
 
ABM said:
Dude, the operative word here is previously. LOL. And, yes, I did read the article.
Click to expand...

Oh, so since you read it you would have seen that 10 reporters contributed to the article. 10 reporters and the complaint is about 1, lolz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
Just seems like, if you have no desire to actually discuss things, if nothing you read can change your mind on topics youre dead set on, no desire to have an actual back and forth on something, or debate a topic....then just post it on your Facebook feed. Or start a thread like sly did. A2M thoughts and musings. Then you can post your findings and we will know you have no real desire to discuss those topics. Just want to post to your feed and jam your head in the sand while pretending somewhere else you're victimized.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
He was claiming that legal immigrants were shitting in the streets of a town near where he lived. But if you had read the article you would have known this.
Click to expand...

OR he thinks all immigrants are illegal.
 
RR7 said:
Just seems like, if you have no desire to actually discuss things, if nothing you read can change your mind on topics youre dead set on, no desire to have an actual back and forth on something, or debate a topic....then just post it on your Facebook feed. Or start a thread like sly did. A2M thoughts and musings. Then you can post your findings and we will know you have no real desire to discuss those topics. Just want to post to your feed and jam your head in the sand while pretending somewhere else you're victimized.
Click to expand...

Echo chambers and sycophants are fun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
THE HCP said:
WOW, never saw this coming. Why do you people even engage?
Click to expand...

Its a kind of entertainment.

You know how when you have a small child and you tease them with stuff like "Oh, I put the remote in the fridge, could you go get it?" and they go get it?

and then come back mad because its not in there, and you then are like "oh wait, I meant the freezer, sorry"
 
SlyPokerDog said:
He was claiming that legal immigrants were shitting in the streets of a town near where he lived. But if you had read the article you would have known this.
Click to expand...

Justing getting back into town from our vacation. Anyway, despite your accusations, I've read all you had posted here from the NYT. In this regard, while they talked about the "gypsies", I never did see the footnotes corroboration of Tucker's comments. Did I overlook it?

Look, the world we now live in is crazy and dangerous. When it comes to immigration issues, I'd rather the powers-that-be error on the side of safety rather than the alternative. That's not being racist, it's being prudent.
 
ABM said:
Justing getting back into town from our vacation. Anyway, despite your accusations, I've read all you had posted here from the NYT. In this regard, while they talked about the "gypsies", I never did see the footnotes corroboration of Tucker's comments. Did I overlook it?

Look, the world we now live in is crazy and dangerous. When it comes to immigration issues, I'd rather the powers-that-be error on the side of safety rather than the alternative. That's not being racist, it's being prudent.
Click to expand...

No, you made this thread without reading the original article. You do this a lot, including your thread about dems wanting to kill babies which turned out to be bullshit. You didn't read the actual bill until being badgered into it.
 
julius said:
Its a kind of entertainment.

You know how when you have a small child and you tease them with stuff like "Oh, I put the remote in the fridge, could you go get it?" and they go get it?

and then come back mad because its not in there, and you then are like "oh wait, I meant the freezer, sorry"
Click to expand...

The game lasts longer if you reverse it. Put the kid in the freezer and tell the remote to go get it.

barfo
 
SlyPokerDog said:
No, you made this thread without reading the original article. You do this a lot, including your thread about dems wanting to kill babies which turned out to be bullshit. You didn't read the actual bill until being badgered into it.
Click to expand...

So what? I posted an article that related aspects of the NYT article. I trusted the writer to be factual in what he related. Plus, the thread about the dems killing babies is not far off the mark. Now you're being a boob. Stop it.
 
ABM said:
So what? I posted an article that related aspects of the NYT article. I trusted the writer to be factual in what he related. Plus, the thread about the dems killing babies is not far off the mark. Now you're being a boob. Stop it.
Click to expand...

You trusted a writer to be factual because it supports your preconceived notion. The same way that you can say the "dems killing babies" is not "far off" the mark, because that thought supports your (incorrect) preconceived notion.
 
julius said:
You trusted a writer to be factual because it supports your preconceived notion. The same way that you can say the "dems killing babies" is not "far off" the mark, because that thought supports your (incorrect) preconceived notion.
Click to expand...

Fair enough, but in some ways, don't we all, at times, trust various authors, broadcasters, clergy, and such, that align with our own views? BTW, I had used the Miami Standard's vernacular, "Killing Babies" when posting that thread. Granted, the Miami Standard is not necessarily a bastion of media standards, LOL, yet it still described, and cited, the basic situation.

Sure, the term, "killing babies", would most likely be found in conservative circles..

https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/1...its-abortion-was-always-about-killing-babies/

....but it's not a ridiculous, or in your terms, "incorrect preconceived notion."
 
Last edited:
ABM said:
Fair enough, but in some ways, don't we all, at times, trust various authors, broadcasters, clergy, and such, that align with our own views? BTW, I had used the Miami Standard's vernacular, "Killing Babies" when posting that thread. Granted, the Miami Standard is not necessarily a bastion of media standards, LOL, yet it still described, and cited, the basic situation.

Sure, the term, "killing babies", would most likely be found in conservative circles..

https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/1...its-abortion-was-always-about-killing-babies/

....but it's not a rediculous, or in your terms, "incorrect preconceived notion."
Click to expand...
yes, it is certainly ridiculous and an incorrectly preconceived notion.
 
ABM said:
Fair enough, but in some ways, don't we all, at times, trust various authors, broadcasters, clergy, and such, that align with our own views? BTW, I had used the Miami Standard's vernacular, "Killing Babies" when posting that thread. Granted, the Miami Standard is not necessarily a bastion of media standards, LOL, yet it still described, and cited, the basic situation.

Sure, the term, "killing babies", would most likely be found in conservative circles..

https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/1...its-abortion-was-always-about-killing-babies/

....but it's not a rediculous, or in your terms, "incorrect preconceived notion."
Click to expand...

You might want to invest in a dictionary.
 
barfo said:
The game lasts longer if you reverse it. Put the kid in the freezer and tell the remote to go get it.

barfo
Click to expand...

You must be wonderful at Semantle.
 
ABM said:
Thanks for the great save. But, if that's all you have to say, so be it.
Click to expand...

My comment wasn't about how you spelled ridiculous wrong, it was your failure to understand the definition of "preconceived"
 
julius said:
My comment wasn't about how you spelled ridiculous wrong, it was your failure to understand the definition of "preconceived"
Click to expand...

Oh, OK. That might be a thesaurus, as well. But, go ahead, splain it to me.
 
ABM said:
Oh, OK. That might be a thesaurus, as well. But, go ahead, splain it to me.
Click to expand...

A thesaurus gives you similar words, not the definitions of word.

Way to prove my point.
 
julius said:
A thesaurus gives you similar words, not the definitions of word.

Way to prove my point.
Click to expand...

You still haven't splained it to me. Go ahead.

PS: You never did respond to my response on the topic at hand.
 
ABM said:
You still haven't splained it to me. Go ahead.
Click to expand...

You have Google, look up what preconceived notions means.
 
ABM said:
Fair enough, but in some ways, don't we all, at times, trust various authors, broadcasters, clergy, and such, that align with our own views? BTW, I had used the Miami Standard's vernacular, "Killing Babies" when posting that thread. Granted, the Miami Standard is not necessarily a bastion of media standards, LOL, yet it still described, and cited, the basic situation.

Sure, the term, "killing babies", would most likely be found in conservative circles..

https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/1...its-abortion-was-always-about-killing-babies/

....but it's not a ridiculous, or in your terms, "incorrect preconceived notion."
Click to expand...

I never rely on a single source. I generally read several sources on the same subject. I use facts to reach the truth. I also make sure to read the original article before I make a sound conclusion.
 
Chris Craig said:
I never rely on a single source. I generally read several sources on the same subject. I use facts to reach the truth. I also make sure to read the original article before I make a sound conclusion.
Click to expand...

Again, I'm not a subscriber to the NYT. I did read what Sly posted in here. I'm not phased.

Thanks
 
julius said:
You trusted a writer to be factual because it supports your preconceived notion. The same way that you can say the "dems killing babies" is not "far off" the mark, because that thought supports your (incorrect) preconceived notion.
Click to expand...

I responded, eh?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top