inconceivable
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2010
- Messages
- 3,751
- Likes
- 4,054
- Points
- 113
Woj doubling down on his Miller take:
Why would any team tell Woj their honest intel before the draft? Keyword: honest
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Woj doubling down on his Miller take:
Woj says he vets things through multiple channels and he also factors in how trustworthy that person has been in the past; which certainly implies that through the last 20 years he has done this (or so) these sources have given him their honest intel previously.Why would any team tell Woj their honest intel before the draft? Keyword: honest
I think there are teams that give Woj real info but for every team that is doing that there are probably two or three that are bullshitting him. I'm sure there are teams that like Miller better than Scoot... it's been a debate among scouts for a while now. Miller is really long, really skilled and a much better shooter than Scoot. Scoot seems to be more aggressive both in play and just in his attitude, in a positive way and for his size seems to be a lot more explosive than Miller. I don't have a hard time believing that Miller is more attractive at 2 for "most teams" it's just that the teams that do want Scoot seem to really really want Scoot.Why would any team tell Woj their honest intel before the draft? Keyword: honest
Shocking news
The more I think about it, the less it makes sense to build around a 33 year old Lillard. He has averaged 44 games played the last 2 seasons, and we expect him to be fully healthy from age 33-36… or healthy enough to justify trading the 3rd pick in a draft considered to be a 3 player draft, and the best in years? I really hope we do what’s best for the franchise and not just what Dame wants. And to anyone who responds we owe Dame… he has made almost half a billion dollars in his career, and Blazers have not won a title… so I don’t think anyone owes anything. I think Zion is the only move that makes sense to give the team a REAL chance at a title with Dame, but not sacrificing future in the process.
Still right thoughWe already knew you thought this before you wrote it. lol.
Still right though
Yeah this article is actually logical. Nothing we don't know, but nonetheless summarizes it all well.
Except for the part where the discussion is a three way with Charlotte, Portland and New Orleans. In it they mention Char could try to leverage an extra asset by trading down and still getting Miller at 3, while NO gets 2 (Scoot) and PDX gets Zion. Portland has the leverage, not Char. PDX can just cut Char out if they are still stuck on Miller. But I do not want Williamson per se. His injury history is Odenesque (new word I just created, bonus points), he is overweight and out of shape. My nine year old shows more commitment than Zion does. Then we get into the recent personal info being splattered all over the web. I would honestly want their 14 back. If NO doesn't like it, oh well. While Zions contract is doable, the rest is sketchy. And I would try to manipulate the 14 into Lively, whatever that entails.
So you are saying that if the Pelicans say no to #14 you walk away from the deal?
I don't think that Dame is so on board with a one and done pick at 3 as some reporters are reporting without a source.
We better make a fucking move and it better not just be Porzingis. It better be a superstar (Zion), an all nba guy (Siakam) or multiple guys that could get to that level (Bridges and Claxton). While we're at it we better give him a bench for the first time in his career.
Exactly.
C - can be good....sometimes
_F - certainly no 'power' there
SF - very small for quite sometime
SG - too small, no defense, and better as a PG, although not really a PG either
PG - finally, one spot we have covered.
I think Ant has value but not playing with Dame (as long as Dame is averaging around 35 minutes). So I think Ant can be traded to Orlando for Gary Harris, WCJ and 11. I think that the smoke from NOLA that they are only interested in pick 3 (Scoot) for other first rounders (pick 14 this draft and future firsts) is just smoke. I think they are sick of the Zion Williamson and would trade Zion for pick 3 (Scoot), Nurk and Gary Harris.
We end up with Dame, Shae, Jeremi, Zion, WCJ, Lively (pick 11), Matisse, Javon Carter (TPMLE) and Nas. I think that rotation challenges for the title if healthy, which I understand is a big if.
And why was he not playing at the end of the season when it was reported he was cleared and healthy? Did he go Ben Simmons? Seriously, I do not know. So yes, need the 14.
Woj and Givony saying Scoot and Miller are both working out again in Charlotte while also meeting MJ.
Fischer had previously said they were simply having dinner.
Think people should get a fairly good idea of their selection soon after the workouts. Agents don't stay quiet.
There are some conflicting reports on this part. One video interview I heard said that he wanted to play but the Hornet FO did not think he was ready and did not want to risk it. So maybe the Ben Simmons comparison is not correct. But to your point....they were also frustrated with the fact that he was not ready.
Either way IMO I would not let #14 be the deciding factor. You either think he will take his conditioning more seriously or you don't.
My guess is if they put Zion on the trade market they will get better offers.
Dame leaving would never be a "Blessing in disguise".Blazers better get the most talent for #3 regardless if that's trading or drafting a player. I don't want them taking lesser talent in return because they're trying to appease Dame.
Sure if the Blazers can trade the pick and contend now then do it, that just seems extremely unlikely with this teams roster and assets.
If Dame wants out then deal with that later. Him leaving might be a blessing in disguise if there's no moves to contend now.
I see the value, I just don't like coming away with both Turner and lively using our best trade assetIf the Blazers cannot swing a deal for Bridges or Brown this Indiana rumor / idea whatever you may call it might work IF done right so here is the framework on such a deal.
-- Blazers Trade #3 , Nurk and Little or Keon and Knox and pick 43 to Pacers for Myles Turner , Jalen Smith , 23' 1st Round picks #7 and #26 and 32 pick ( maybe alittle more but loose framework on deal )
THEN the Blazers use those 3 1st's and maybe Ant for another Vet OR and this is what I would do -- use the 7th pick on Lively
This might not be sexy like getting a Bridges or Brown but you keep Ant and get front court help in Smith and Lively and maybe use the 2 later 1st's for more Vet's or trade up or something.
The only problem with this scenario is we have to hope that Cronin is not a complete tool and can turn these assets into something more but were also not overpaying in giving up Ant and 3 like I said it's not perfect but kind of allows the Blazers to get Dame help and does not totally mortgage the future and tie up a shit ton of money more then 2 or 3 years.
Getting Bridges isn't sexy. He's had one 27 game run in his 5 year career where he was all star level on offense and that was with the Nets having a losing record and no one else who was consistently scoring. I like the idea of getting Bridges and Claxton for pick 3 but that isn't sexy it's what they are worth or a slight overpay. I think if we do that deal, Ant has to be re-routed to a team like the Magic so we can send an expiring like Harris to Brooklyn along with Nurk and get pick 11 from Orlando.If the Blazers cannot swing a deal for Bridges or Brown this Indiana rumor / idea whatever you may call it might work IF done right so here is the framework on such a deal.
-- Blazers Trade #3 , Nurk and Little or Keon and Knox and pick 43 to Pacers for Myles Turner , Jalen Smith , 23' 1st Round picks #7 and #26 and 32 pick ( maybe alittle more but loose framework on deal )
THEN the Blazers use those 3 1st's and maybe Ant for another Vet OR and this is what I would do -- use the 7th pick on Lively
This might not be sexy like getting a Bridges or Brown but you keep Ant and get front court help in Smith and Lively and maybe use the 2 later 1st's for more Vet's or trade up or something.
The only problem with this scenario is we have to hope that Cronin is not a complete tool and can turn these assets into something more but were also not overpaying in giving up Ant and 3 like I said it's not perfect but kind of allows the Blazers to get Dame help and does not totally mortgage the future and tie up a shit ton of money more then 2 or 3 years.
Naw i think the Blazers can come away bigger in a trading of the #3. Getting a top talent and a pick in return is more likely due to the interest in both Scoot and Miller around the League. Those Indiana players seem small potatoes to me.If the Blazers cannot swing a deal for Bridges or Brown this Indiana rumor / idea whatever you may call it might work IF done right so here is the framework on such a deal.
-- Blazers Trade #3 , Nurk and Little or Keon and Knox and pick 43 to Pacers for Myles Turner , Jalen Smith , 23' 1st Round picks #7 and #26 and 32 pick ( maybe alittle more but loose framework on deal )
THEN the Blazers use those 3 1st's and maybe Ant for another Vet OR and this is what I would do -- use the 7th pick on Lively
This might not be sexy like getting a Bridges or Brown but you keep Ant and get front court help in Smith and Lively and maybe use the 2 later 1st's for more Vet's or trade up or something.
The only problem with this scenario is we have to hope that Cronin is not a complete tool and can turn these assets into something more but were also not overpaying in giving up Ant and 3 like I said it's not perfect but kind of allows the Blazers to get Dame help and does not totally mortgage the future and tie up a shit ton of money more then 2 or 3 years.
Giving up 3rd pick for Bridges is the worst case scenario IMO. He is 27 and never been an all star… and one good defensive player will not make this a good defensive team overall. Plus you would lose 23 ppg from Ant. Definition of mediocrity… enjoy the 7-8 seed for 2-3 years while Scoot and Miller become stars.Getting Bridges isn't sexy. He's had one 27 game run in his 5 year career where he was all star level on offense and that was with the Nets having a losing record and no one else who was consistently scoring. I like the idea of getting Bridges and Claxton for pick 3 but that isn't sexy it's what they are worth or a slight overpay. I think if we do that deal, Ant has to be re-routed to a team like the Magic so we can send an expiring like Harris to Brooklyn along with Nurk and get pick 11 from Orlando.