You forgot to say 'held overseas'. Not all profits are held overseas.
You want to pretend there aren't any profits that could be taxed. There are, there are $6T in profits each and every year.
I'm not actually arguing for increasing corporate taxes. I'm just pointing out that your DennyMath is very misleading - at best.
barfo
For the companies to get to zero or negative tax, virtually all of their profit is overseas.
Otherwise they'd be paying US taxes on it.
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/feb/02/apple-cash-mountain-grows
Apple last week reported that its cash mountain had grown to $178bn (£118bn) – among the biggest of any public corporation in the world. The lion’s share is surplus profits from outside America, in large part thanks to the huge popularity of its phones, laptops and other products around the globe, but also in no small measure because of its aggressive Irish tax structure.
As at the end of September last year, cash held offshore and beyond the grasp of the US taxman stood at $137bn and is likely to have grown since. At present, this sum cannot be reinvested in Apple’s US businesses nor returned to shareholders without incurring a colossal tax bill. In effect, it is in limbo.
The cash pile is technically owned by Apple’s subsidiaries in Knocknaheeny, a rundown northern suburb of Cork, Ireland. But it is managed by a rarely talked-of investment subsidiary closer to home and largely invested in American assets, including billions in corporate bonds and US government debt.
There is only one brief mention of this opaque internal investment company in Apple’s
annual report, on page 114. It is called Braeburn Capital and registered in
a quiet corner of Reno, Nevada. Some commentators have described it as
“the biggest hedge fund you’ve never heard of”.
It is this kind of operation – common to many US multinationals, particularly in the tech and pharmaceuticals industries – that Obama is looking to deflate, freeing up America’s largest companies to repatriate cash held in limbo, but without releasing them entirely from US tax liabilities they have been avoiding for years, often very creatively.
My note: the remainder of the $178B is not "permanently invested" overseas, but it is overseas and the tax deferred. If they had paid 35% tax on it all along, it would have been ~$3.5B/year in revenue to the government. To make things even better for Apple, when they need cash, they borrow money from the overseas subsidiary. Borrowed money isn't taxed, and the interest paid (from apple to apple) is.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/apple-to-offer-more-bonds-1422888975
Apple Boosts Size of Bond Deal to $6.5 Billion
U.S.’s Largest High-Grade Corporate-Debt Sale This Year Finds Strong Demand; ‘A Nice, Core Holding’