I still do not get this.
okay so we spend whatever to house them. They still have no job, no food, no clothes.
Many homeless have mental issues or drug problems. These problems will continue even with a roof over thier head, so much of the costs will still be the same plus the costs rentals for a roof.
To say the problem is solved( no im not saying your said this) by putting the homeless under a roof is dramatically oversimplifying the multifaceted aNd complex problem with the homeless.
So lets say we put the addicts in a rehab program:
Some inpatient rehabsmay cost around $6,000 for a 30-day program. Well-known centers often cost up to $20,000 for a 30-day program. For those requiring 60- or 90-day programs, the total average of costs could range anywhere from $12,000 to $60,000.
This cost is alot more than your numbers. And tbis is just for the rehab probram. Not the house, food, clothes, etc.
When an officer goes on a call and it involves a homeless drug addict person committing a crime, are all of hours spent added to “the spent on homeless”? Spent on “illegal drug addiction” or spent on the “crime commited?”
If all the time is allotted to “spent on the homeless”, then its skewed.
Soooo many x factors ive pointed out here and before that i do not belwive there is any way they can come up with an accurate nimber of what is spent on the homeless vs ahat we would save housing them.
and before you point to other places as a successful test, lets focus on here, where ww have more homeless than any other state, which makes it harder, a larger drug addiction problem, which makes it harder, etc.
just not seeing the numbers add up. At all.
its really easy to say “improve education Nd health cRw and we solve most problems”
Improving education and health care is not as easy as you continually try to portray, or we would have done it long long ago.