I don't think comparing Nurk and Zach is fair...to Zach. Nurk is a phenomenal player, a bone fide starter with a ceiling at near All-Star level, whose impact on the game is clear, while Zach...? I've definitely seen Zach have an impact on games, but dude is likely not a starter on the majority of NBA rosters, when healthy. I mean, Nurk is a force and Zach is more of a complementary player. I don't know, they are just very different players; I just think it is a bad comp.
So, Zach is special because he's twice blocked 6 shots in a game and is tall and can jump with his arms straight up? He's also prone to fouling 3 point shooters and throwing ah-shucks tantrums.
It's coming off like I don't like Zach. I do. I just think there are a dozen of him in the league and it's a damn shame we got a broken one.