dviss1
Emcee Referee
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2011
- Messages
- 29,650
- Likes
- 27,587
- Points
- 113
CJ, Zach, Simons, and 2 firsts for AD and Johnson let’s go god dammit.
Let's fuckin' go!!! Shit, take 3 firsts!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CJ, Zach, Simons, and 2 firsts for AD and Johnson let’s go god dammit.
Dame and AD cannot win us a championship over Golden State. I'm sorry if you think otherwise, but it's common sense. We need more. Which is why I'm a huge proponent of keeping Nurk. Get rid of CJ if you must, but not Nurk. We NEED him and Dame to rebuild around when Davis leaves, instead of two small guards; one of whom will never reach All Star status.
Id trade Nurk, he’s a very solid player and I love the offense going through him. AD’s legitimately a top 5 talent though (at least in my opinion), perfect solution I wouldnt want to Add Nurk but if thats what it took I would do it.No Dame. No Nurk.
when healthy, and when not leaving in free agency...Easily. Shouldn’t even be a discussion. Davis is a top 5 player.
I’m including CJ with Nurk
honestly if you go for it and get AD and he leaves ur not “starting” a rebuild around a 30 year old Dame either
Of course you would take all 3 but how do you get a top 5 player without giving him up? This CJ/Zach talk is delusional. It would take CJ/Nurk/2 1s and they probably still say no.
Id trade Nurk, he’s a very solid player and I love the offense going through him. AD’s legitimately a top 5 talent though (at least in my opinion), perfect solution I wouldnt want to Add Nurk but if thats what it took I would do it.
Why would a rebuilding team looking to get young and start over take Evan Turner and that contract? He almost has negative trade value.I know that. And I'm saying that's not a very smart thing to do. Those two cannot win us a championship in the West; you need more than that. So keep Nurk.
....what? Who else besides Dame are we going to start it around? Layman? Chief?
You want 30 year old Dame and nobody else of note? That's a surefire way to get him to leave for a supermax somewhere else. Which would be incredibly stupid.
Bullshit. My original offer, which I've been adament about all this time, is CJ, Turner, Collins, and maybe (or preferably, IMO) Simons, plus 2 or 3 firsts.
New Orleans would be insane not to take that, and we would still have a respectable bench, and 3 top-tier players. Dame, Davis, Nurk, Layman/Seth, Chief.
I'd take that over Davis, Dame, Leonard, Seth, and Chief.
Why nobody sees this is beyond me. Why the holy hell would we leave Dame all alone when Davis leaves? He'd have NOBODY to build around. At least with Nurk, we'd still have something, and he'd still be young too.
Why would a rebuilding team looking to get young and start over take Evan Turner and that contract? He almost has negative trade value.
I know that. And I'm saying that's not a very smart thing to do. Those two cannot win us a championship in the West; you need more than that. So keep Nurk.
....what? Who else besides Dame are we going to start it around? Layman? Chief?
You want 30 year old Dame and nobody else of note? That's a surefire way to get him to leave for a supermax somewhere else. Which would be incredibly stupid.
Bullshit. My original offer, which I've been adament about all this time, is CJ, Turner, Collins, and maybe (or preferably, IMO) Simons, plus 2 or 3 firsts.
Wait til dust settlesWhat the hell are the pelicans doing? anyone wanna explain?
Id want to give 28-29 year old Dame the best shot of winning you can, building around AD and Dame is way easier than Dame / CJ and Nurk as evidenced by AD and Co beating them in the playoffs 4-0. If AD leaves its also the year half your team is FA’s you can rebuild you’re going to have to anyways. If they do get to them WCF or something your chances of keeping AD go up.And.....again........when Davis leaves, do you want him to leave us with Dame and Nurk? Or.....Dame and..............???????
So NO gets a SG that wouldn’t pair well with Jrue in the starting lineup(both at over 25 mil per), a horrible contract, a huge question mark, and 3 1s in the late 20s?
Why is this better than what the lakers are offering or what Boston could easily offer?
New Orleans does have some leverage, in that they are fielding offers from several teams. They may be "insane not to take" a Cj/Collins/Simons/picks offer, but they do have the option to do exactly that, and demand more (ie Nurk).I know that. And I'm saying that's not a very smart thing to do. Those two cannot win us a championship in the West; you need more than that. So keep Nurk.
....what? Who else besides Dame are we going to start it around? Layman? Chief?
You want 30 year old Dame and nobody else of note? That's a surefire way to get him to leave for a supermax somewhere else. Which would be incredibly stupid.
Bullshit. My original offer, which I've been adament about all this time, is CJ, Turner, Collins, and maybe (or preferably, IMO) Simons, plus 2 or 3 firsts.
New Orleans would be insane not to take that, and we would still have a respectable bench, and 3 top-tier players. Dame, Davis, Nurk, Layman/Seth, Chief.
I'd take that over Davis, Dame, Leonard, Seth, and Chief.
Why nobody sees this is beyond me. Why the holy hell would we leave Dame all alone when Davis leaves? He'd have NOBODY to build around. At least with Nurk, we'd still have something, and he'd still be young too.
New Orleans does have some leverage, in that they are fielding offers from several teams. They may be "insane not to take" a Cj/Collins/Simons/picks offer, but they do have the option to do exactly that, and demand more (ie Nurk).
Id want to give 28-29 year old Dame the best shot of winning you can, building around AD and Dame is way easier than Dame / CJ and Nurk as evidenced by AD and Co beating them in the playoffs 4-0. If AD leaves its also the year half your team is FA’s you can rebuild you’re going to have to anyways. If they do get to them WCF or something your chances of keeping AD go up.
Would I put Nurk on the table to start? no way, but if they played hardball for him Id do it.
I’d take Tatum over CJ in a heartbeat and it’s been reported no C’s are off limit in AD discussions.Because CJ alone is better than any of those clowns being offered in LA.
Yeah wel No shouldve thought of that a long time ago, fact its very very Unlikely your offer of ET would be something that they’d even consider.And what the hell are WE going to do with him?
Our interests are to get better. Fuck everyone else.
Wesley johnson. So, yeahFuck. Bet it’s for nothing.
Wesley johnson. So, yeah
This^Blazers don’t have enough for Davis. Can we stop the pipe dream already.
I’d take Tatum over CJ in a heartbeat and it’s been reported no C’s are off limit in AD discussions.