Everything Beagle
Local Trans Icon
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 5,696
- Likes
- 7,653
- Points
- 113
Dallas already does that nowThe NBA should just give the top picks to the Lakers every year
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dallas already does that nowThe NBA should just give the top picks to the Lakers every year
Sorry man, I think your idea is terrible. If teams stink they could stink forever. Punishing the least talented teams is like charging the highest tax rate to a homeless person.My tanking solution is still the best. Salary incentive for staying out of bottom 3. And bottom 3 get last 3 picks of first round. This is only proposal that gives incentive to players, coaches, and GMs to win. A Pacers/Wizards game in April could get great ratings. Both teams would want to win.
Teams on the fringe would still game the system. Give all the teams the same exact odds for draft position in the first round. There would be zero incentive to throw games and competitive athletes and coaches would play to win every game. The second round would be based on record, worst first, best last.That's really stupid if that's what he said.
All he had to say was that the lottery would determine all 14 spots and all 14 teams would have the same odds.
That would definitely get rid of tanking.
Teams on the fringe wouldn't be tanking the way we think of tanking, where a team aims for 18 wins. That is the issue.Teams on the fringe would still game the system. Give all the teams the same exact odds for draft position in the first round. There would be zero incentive to throw games and competitive athletes and coaches would play to win every game. The second round would be based on record, worst first, best last.
Read this board, even in wins, this place is melting down about a poor product in the first half of close games. People would be demanding half refunds for poor starts. What if the team plays like shit when I'm at the game? Can I get a refund because I paid to see them win? What if we win, but I bought a ticket to see the opponent, and THEIR star was out? Blazers still have to refund me?Tanking is easy solve if you put fans first.
If teams want to tank, which honestly, that should be their right to do, then they have to refund their fans and season ticket holders 50% of the ticket cost.
Yes, there should be a penalty/fine if teams intentionally put out a poor product. But it should be the fans, not the league, who benefit from any financial penalty.
The truth is that they don’t want small market teams to have equal odds.I can't believe there is talk over taking away the lottery when they could simply make it a true lottery with equal odds across the board. Simple, problem solved.
My plan still rewards bad teams. Just not the worst. You could make it 18, 19, 20 if you want but as long as you reward the worst teams, tanking will always be exist.Sorry man, I think your idea is terrible. If teams stink they could stink forever. Punishing the least talented teams is like charging the highest tax rate to a homeless person.
It also could incentivize teams to try to coerce players to play hurt so they don't end up in the bottom three.
well duhhhh....this whole "we need to fix the tanking issue" is horseshit![]()
Cuban: NBA should 'embrace tanking' to improve fan experience
Mark Cuban, the former majority owner of the Dallas Mavericks, says the fan experience is chief among the reasons the NBA should "embrace tanking," and that affordability is key in the formula.www.espn.com
If he really said corporate welfare he is an absolute douche.I'm not surprised that someone in the media wants to basically keep the talent funneled to the same 5-6 games.
