Rastapopoulos
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2008
- Messages
- 42,144
- Likes
- 26,505
- Points
- 113
It is to laugh:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is to laugh:
Not sure where you're pulling that from. His D in Minnesota was not viewed as a positive. Below is only one of many articles I could link expressing the big steps forward on D Wiggins has taken since the trade.lil of both. this has now become a talking point among the NBA media folk last few days. Who is the next Wiggins, and can our team rescue him with a change of scenery?
Apparent criteria for said target:
- strong foundational talent who is miscast as a #1.
- coachable, desire to improve.
- willingness to listen. Recall his anti-vax stance to start the year. But he listened to his teammates who convinced him to change his mind for the team.
- strong skills at least on one end of the floor. Wiggins was always a strong defender. His offensive inefficiency was more the problem in Minny.
- zero injury history.
- Overpaid with dwindling trade value.
And we could have kept him when he played for us in the preseason. He has always been the perfect backup pg for Dame.I know it's a team game, and I'm admittedly a duck hater, but look at GPII getting a ring before that Pritchard guy! It almost makes it okay for me that the fucking warriors won. Ugh, I'm conflicted.
Go Beavs!
You're missing the point. Which is fine, because all you seem to care about is nitpicking the hell out of my posts while ignoring context. Wiggins' strengths coming of Kansas were all about defense. That it didn't manifest in Minny is proving exactly what i'm trying to say. I'm trying to draw parallels to guys who have the foundational ability but did not meet expectations initially, but found a better footing after change of scenery.Not sure where you're pulling that from. His D in Minnesota was not viewed as a positive. Below is only one of many articles I could link expressing the big steps forward on D Wiggins has taken since the trade.
Wiggins was considerably better on offense than defense through his first few NBA seasons, and the one thing people were most concerned about — the ability to create his own shot — was arguably his only high-level skill. Wiggins was an extremely poor rebounder for his size and position, he rarely created opportunities for his teammates, he did not shoot efficiently from anywhere other than the immediate area around the rim, and he was routinely criticized for poor effort.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/andrew-wiggins-isnt-an-albatross-anymore/
STOMP
Not sure where you're pulling that from. His D in Minnesota was not viewed as a positive. Below is only one of many articles I could link expressing the big steps forward on D Wiggins has taken since the trade.
Wiggins was considerably better on offense than defense through his first few NBA seasons, and the one thing people were most concerned about — the ability to create his own shot — was arguably his only high-level skill. Wiggins was an extremely poor rebounder for his size and position, he rarely created opportunities for his teammates, he did not shoot efficiently from anywhere other than the immediate area around the rim, and he was routinely criticized for poor effort.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/andrew-wiggins-isnt-an-albatross-anymore/
STOMP
Read your post, the one I responded to. You said he was always a strong defender while at Minnesota, which he wasn’t according to Wolves fans and media and analytics. My short response was about how he actually did in the NBA not what he was projected to do years before as a prospect. Good grief dude, take a breathYou're missing the point. Which is fine, because blah blah blah
I've wondered why Wendell Moore is looking like only a low- to mid-2nd round pick, as I like him more than top-10 teammate AJ Griffin, and he fits that strategy perfectly.