MickZagger
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 37,539
- Likes
- 16,512
- Points
- 113
What would you rather have Lee/Asik or Aldridge/Kaman?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What would you rather have Lee/Asik or Aldridge/Kaman?
That's like choosing between a punch in the nuts or a kick in the nuts.
Both are better than a graze to the nuts.
The Graze to the nuts would be signing Tiago splitter to a 4/55m contract and trading LMA for Bargs.
I would give a Lee/Thompson idea some serious consideration. Then move Wessy in a deal for Asik.So if the Warriors had their hearts set on Aldridge, what deal would you accept?
Lee/Thompson/Barnes?
I would give a Lee/Thompson idea some serious consideration. Then move Wessy in a deal for Asik.
Researched Klay some more. Nvm on that. I was kinda misguided by that 34/14 game he had in the playoffs. Seems more like an anomaly than a regular occurrence considering his mediocre performance in the other games.
What would you rather have Lee/Asik or Aldridge/Kaman?
I pick lee/asik if I'm wanting to be in mediocrity
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Aldridge/Kaman is pretty mediocre as well. Both scenarios scream "one and out" to me.
I see no reason why the blazers will grab kaman. He isn't even better than hickson; IMO. I think the kaman thing is a smoke screen.
The fact that we heard about this at all tells me that Olshey is publicly setting the market. Good for him.
I don't think we are signing the center as a free agent. I still believe we are trading for one. The free agent pool will have too many overpriced bigs.
David Lee/Brandon Rush is a pretty low bar.
I seriously wonder if maybe there is a wink-wink deal in place to get Asik if Howard signs with Houston.
You're not going to get both -- either or.
I'd look at Klay and look to move Batum for a PF.
Depends on the circumstance. If Howard told Golden State, "The only way I come is if you bring in Aldridge"; then I bet they would. It now becomes more of a "We must get this done, so we will give more value"
Why would he say that? I don't think Dwight really gives a shit about Lamarcus. That team with shooters and Curry is arguably better than Curry/LA/Howard but no shooters.
What about a deal centered around Bogut and Lee for LMA and our cap space?

What about a deal centered around Bogut and Lee for LMA and our cap space?
