SharpesTriumph
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 4, 2018
- Messages
- 12,698
- Likes
- 11,427
- Points
- 113
The Blazers are better starting Simons than McCollum. You believe McCollum is the better starter than Simons. Different opinions.
I'm fine with the Blazers moving forward with Simons starting in place of McCollum. No problem with that opinion whatsoever.
I'm not fine with giving away Norm for nothing and getting scrubs for Roco both a week before the deadline offers were made.
I'm not fine with coming away basically getting just Hart for CJ and Nance.
Ideally the Blazers should've shopped for better returns of talent. All players were fine to trade. But they didn't have to be traded. The Blazers didn't have to trade the players to the players preferred destinations. The Blazers didn't have to hold out for this Ben Simmons cap space pipe dream that evaporated 2 days later.
The Blazers needed to make good moves to increase their talent to contend. Instead they reduced their talent at the deadline. They got cap space flexibility when its nearly worthless. They didn't gain useful draft assets. It was an epic fail then, and has put the team in position to fail now. This is evident in the Blazers having the 3rd worst future roster rank in the NBA per ESPN even with Dame.