BGrantFan
Suspended
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2010
- Messages
- 5,194
- Likes
- 52
- Points
- 0
That's neat. Now he has an hour show on the weekends and a PR firm that is near bankrupt.
Hi Brian!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's your real name, Ed?
Gee, Brian is in the PR business, which I know a lot about in Portland. Suddenly, he's parroting what Steve Patterson has been saying over the airwaves.
95.5, do you consider this a conflict of interest?
Also, what's wrong with me calling out a public figure behind a wall of anonymity? Is criticizing Quick and Canzano OK, but calling out this little shit Brian Berger against the rules? If so, let me known.
He's been appearing on radio since at LEAST 2006, which predates 95.5 The Game by a couple of years.
You claiming he got his first radio gig there is factually inaccurate unless a time machine is involved somehow.
Ed O.
Ed. Ed O., actually, and you could find my full real name and mailing address and probably a phone number within about 15 minutes of searching online.

I don't know what he was reporting before. Is he being inconsistent with what he'd reported before?
Not at all. Why would I? He was pretty brutal on Bert Kolde in that clip and wasn't very kind to Paul Allen, either.
You look ridiculous and petty. You've got your facts wrong and look ignorant and more than a bit crazy.
Other than that, there's nothing wrong with what you're doing.
Ed O.
Great. Now, validate what Brian is claiming, and then call his PR "firm" and ask about his client list.
I have literally zero interest in doing that. If you want to criticize me for being anonymous, post her with your full name. Or, shut up about it.![]()
I have little reason to believe anything this guy is saying. He basically says Steve Patterson's story and says yup, it's true.
This is boring.
Ed Ouellette.
Feel better?
Going to admit you're a hypocrite now? Or a coward?
Or not?
Ed O.
So everybody here who criticizes a public figure is a hypocrite, other than you, of course?
That's a pretty broad brush, Mr. Ouellette. Or does this only apply to me?
Read the link ABM gave you.
Do you think that the blog entries about being on Sirius were fabrications? Or do you want to admit you were wrong?
Ed O.
Back on topic.
Some of the stated reasons for firing KP are rather suspect.
He wanted a raise? Wow, like no PA emplyee has ever asked for a raise before.
Patterson gets the credit for Roy/LMA? Then I guess he should also be held responsible for Webster-over-Paul, or Telfair- over- Jefferson.
Some of the other stuff, about KP's unpopularity with staff/players, sounds like Patterson projecting his own experience onto KP.
To be blunt, this sounds less like "inside info", and more like Patterson.
Things I took away from the program (assuming Brian Berger is telling the truth).
Things I took away from the program (assuming Brian Berger is telling the truth).
1. The Blazers needed a new face of the franchise in 2006 because Patterson was so villified (rightly so) in the local media.
2. There's a fairly strong chance Patterson made the deals, KP helped ID the talent (or didn't if Berger is telling the truth about him wanting Morrison)
3. We now have conflicting reports about how much credit/blame is due KP and two of the people contradicting the official account we've been lead to believe are former employees who may or may not have an axe to grind with KP and could have just as much of an axe to grind with Allen, but we don't really know.
4. KP is fired. It was either because of gross incompetence and petty jealousy on the part of Allen, or he had basketball related reasons for doing so ...
I want to believe there were basketball related/professional reasons because it means that maybe the inmates aren't running the asylum. As a fan of the Blazers you should probably want Patterson and Berger's version of events to be true if you harbor hopes of them winning a championship. If you discount their versions of events and Paul Allen is a bumbling idiot with a vindictive streak that overrules common sense then your favorite hoops team is probably fucked and they're probably not worth wasting your time on. Who knows what is true.
Why on Earth would you assume that he's telling the truth, or even knows the truth? Did you mean if he's telling the truth?
I don't know him, I don't have any personal experience with him and I tend not to make judgements about people's truthfulness or duplicitous nature until I've been given evidence one way or another. All I know is that we now have two people who have gone on the record contradicting the image that KP was the golden boy he was made out to be. It's food for thought, nothing more, nothing less.
I don't know him, I don't have any personal experience with him and I tend not to make judgements about people's truthfulness or duplicitous nature until I've been given evidence one way or another. All I know is that we now have two people who have gone on the record contradicting the image that KP was the golden boy he was made out to be. It's food for thought, nothing more, nothing less.
Why on Earth would you assume that he's telling the truth, or even knows the truth? Did you mean if he's telling the truth?
Two people, neither of who were even employed by the Blazers for the last 4 years, and there stories are the same. Plus, one works in PR, and a very negative personality just crawled out from under his rock of shame to try and rehabilitate his image.. Yet you "assume" Berger is telling the truth? lol
I have a bridge to sell you. Interested? It's in Arizona.
Not trying to be combative here, but why wouldn't you assume he is telling the truth. I have never heard anything about Berger having an axe to grind.
I find it interesting that a bumbling incompetent with no skills whatsoever like Kevin Pritchard was promoted to GM, much less allowed to keep his job for four years given how terrible he is.
Color me skeptical.
I "assume" he's telling the truth? No, no I don't. Re-read what I wrote; I gave the caveat that "assuming Berger is telling the truth" then here is what I take away from his program etc. etc. etc. I neither assume he tells the truth nor do I assume he's lying. I "assume" he made some statements that stand out because they are so starkly different than the image that has been painted about KP and the organization over the past 4 years. To me this is just fodder for conversation, nothing more and nothing less.

