because that's a gauge without context? for instance, he had a 33 point game....but he needed 31 shots to get that 33 point game
* he has a PER of 9.2 when the NBA average is 15.0
* he has a TS% of .483 when the NBA team median is .580
* he has a eFG% of .427 when the NBA team median .542
* he has a winshare/48 of -.044 when the NBA average is +.100
* he has a BPM of -6.2 when the NBA mark for an average player on an average team is 0.0
* his assist/turnover ratio is 1.60 which is terrible for an PG, and still poor for a rookie PG
* out of 188 players tracked by bbref, Scoot ranks 186th in turnover rate; 188th in BPM; 188th in winshares/48; 184th in PER
* out of 195 players tracked, Scoot ranks 195th in TS%
* out of 562 NBA players tracked, Scoot ranks 562nd in VORP
obviously, all those stats have missing context as well. They don't differentiate between C's, SF's, and PG's. They don't really gauge the quality of teams or teammates or rotations or factor injuries. They don't gauge by age or experience
but statistically, Scoot has been terrible. That seems a fairly objective reality. A couple of 20 & 10 games don't change that
I'm not saying there isn't hope for the guy as the PGOTF; eyeball gauges offer some hope. I am saying there's nothing hopeful found in his season stats this year