The Sebastian Express
Snarflepumpkin
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2008
- Messages
- 3,395
- Likes
- 61
- Points
- 48
Pau faded, if I recall, because his fiance and he broke up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I really think the Lakers had a deal in place, or a good idea that they would be getting Dwight Howard. Why else would they move their two big guys? I don't think LA would trade Pau and Odom for CP3 if they didn't know they were going to get Howard. IF they get Howard, the deal makes sense, and even a hobbled CP3 paired with Kobe and Howard makes them the front runner for the championship.
Stern, the only guy in the room with a clue, more likely vetoed it because he thought the Lakers gave up too much.
this trade would have improved the hornets and fucked the lakers...wtf!
I don't think this move by the NBA and Stern sets a bad precedent. How often does the league own a team and control its operations? Stern can't afford the image that the NBA is engineering these kinds of moves to send stars like CP3 to big markets like the Lakers.
but now the hornets cant trade him
There's nothing in the league's statement that another trade can't be made for CP3. It was specific to the terms of this specific deal.
As one rival executive with strong ties to the league office said, “Stern cared about two things: Selling that franchise for the best possible price; and showing the players that they weren’t going to dictate where teams could trade them. But now, there’s no way that the league can allow Chris Paul to be traded at all, otherwise Stern is basically deciding where one of the top players in the league is going versus having any fair process.”
Not if they got Howard.
Can Stern die? I wasn't even excited about the trade, but I'm pissed about this. Stern just FUCKED the chemistry of 3 teams and took a hell of a package away from New Orleans.
That's just a random quote from an unnamed source. Stern said nothing about blocking all trades for CP3.
Mike Rice @mikerice6
Mike brown will have kobe explain to lamar that we still love you (they tried to trade you lamar)
Dan Gilbert has another strong argument against the deal:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=ys-nba_dan_gilbert_email_lakers_hornets_trade_120811
Dan Gilbert has another strong argument against the deal:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=ys-nba_dan_gilbert_email_lakers_hornets_trade_120811
When will we just change the name of 25 of the 30 teams to the Washington Generals?
Sounds to me like gilbert is still butthurt over losing Lebron.
He was actually laying out the economics of the deal pretty well. Dumping the crap contract of Gasol and getting CP3 is too lopsided for a team owned by the rest of the league to abide.
Sounds to me like gilbert is still butthurt over losing Lebron. again, where is rc buford in all this? probably not caring because he is one of the talented small market gms and doesnt need rules put in place to save him from himself
who the hell is he to decide what a team can do?
One of the 29 owners of the team involved in the trade.
I don't believe Buford has any say. The Spurs' owner Peter Holt was actually one of the faces of the so called hardliners during the CBA negotiations.Sounds to me like gilbert is still butthurt over losing Lebron. again, where is rc buford in all this? probably not caring because he is one of the talented small market gms and doesnt need rules put in place to save him from himself
