CIA: Russia influenced the election

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Iraq has a population of 33+ million.

Isis had 31,000 militants in Iraq.

So for every 1 Isis dumb fuck there were 10,000 Iraqis.

And they need us to get rid of Isis? Really?

Iraq won't put any skin in the game but we're suppose to?

Fuck that!

Fuck keeping our troops in Iraq for as long as we did.

Fuck sending them back there.

AND FUCK IRAQ!
 
Iraq has a population of 33+ million.

Isis had 31,000 militants in Iraq.

So for every 1 Isis dumb fuck there were 10,000 Iraqis.

And they need us to get rid of Isis? Really?

Iraq won't put any skin in the game but we're suppose to?

Fuck that!

Fuck keeping our troops in Iraq for as long as we did.

Fuck sending them back there.

AND FUCK IRAQ!
Can I get an Amen? Tell it like it is Brother Dog!!
 
Did you hear?

NBC predicted Clinton would win over 350 electoral votes.

Boy are they good.

Good and pissed. All that investment down the drain.
Do you even try to make sense any more? I've known literal schizophrenics who were more coherent than you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's funny - when I was a vaguely left-wing kid at a school full of rich kids in Thatcher's Britain I got told to "fuck off to Russia" (for, among other things, criticizing the Falklands War). Now, apparently Republicans should REALLY fuck off to Russia. Actually, Denny would fit right in. I don't think they call it Pravda any more but he's certainly got the skills.
 
Do you even try to make sense any more? I've known literal schizophrenics who were more coherent than you.

I'm not sure if I've ever tried to make sense.

But you need to stop with the personal insults.

Thanks.
 
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/14/craig-murray-says-source-of-hillary-clinton-campai/

WikiLeaks figure says ‘disgusted’ Democrat leaked Clinton campaign emails

A WikiLeaks figure is claiming that he received leaked Clinton campaign emails from a “disgusted” Democratic whistleblower, while the White House continued to blame Russian hackers Wednesday for meddling in the presidential election and asserted that Donald Trump was “obviously aware” of Moscow’s efforts on his behalf.

Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, said in the report by the Daily Mail that he flew to Washington for a clandestine handoff with one of the email sources in September.

He said he received a package in a wooded area near American University.

“Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,” Mr. Murray told the British newspaper. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”
 
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/14/craig-murray-says-source-of-hillary-clinton-campai/

WikiLeaks figure says ‘disgusted’ Democrat leaked Clinton campaign emails

A WikiLeaks figure is claiming that he received leaked Clinton campaign emails from a “disgusted” Democratic whistleblower, while the White House continued to blame Russian hackers Wednesday for meddling in the presidential election and asserted that Donald Trump was “obviously aware” of Moscow’s efforts on his behalf.

Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, said in the report by the Daily Mail that he flew to Washington for a clandestine handoff with one of the email sources in September.

He said he received a package in a wooded area near American University.

“Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,” Mr. Murray told the British newspaper. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”

Well, that's certainly an important find. I guess we really do need to scrap the CIA, as they clearly are completely incompetent. Another important scoop from the Washington Times, an internationally respected journalistic titan.
 
Well, that's certainly an important find. I guess we really do need to scrap the CIA, as they clearly are completely incompetent. Another important scoop from the Washington Times, an internationally respected journalistic titan.

Suuuuuure. The CIA is infallible.


http://nation.time.com/2012/09/06/iraq-how-the-cia-says-it-blew-it-on-saddams-wmd/

Iraq: How the CIA Says It Blew It on Saddam’s WMD

Now that we’re out of Iraq, the CIA has come clean on how it came to be bamboozled about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) ferrets over at the National Security Archive (NSA) petitioned for, and got, the CIA’s equivalent of the dog-ate-my-homework. (Technically, the NSA obtained this document under a mandatory-declassification-review request it made in 2006, which can be faster [It still took six years!] than an FOIA request if the requester has sufficient details on a specific document.)

Bottom line, from the CIA’s point of view: Saddam used to lie about possessing WMD, so we believed he still was.

Unfortunately, the U.S. went to war based largely on that false intelligence. And 4,486 U.S. troops, 318 allies and untold thousands of Iraqis died in the ensuing conflict.
 
Suuuuuure. The CIA is infallible.


http://nation.time.com/2012/09/06/iraq-how-the-cia-says-it-blew-it-on-saddams-wmd/

Iraq: How the CIA Says It Blew It on Saddam’s WMD

Now that we’re out of Iraq, the CIA has come clean on how it came to be bamboozled about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) ferrets over at the National Security Archive (NSA) petitioned for, and got, the CIA’s equivalent of the dog-ate-my-homework. (Technically, the NSA obtained this document under a mandatory-declassification-review request it made in 2006, which can be faster [It still took six years!] than an FOIA request if the requester has sufficient details on a specific document.)

Bottom line, from the CIA’s point of view: Saddam used to lie about possessing WMD, so we believed he still was.

Unfortunately, the U.S. went to war based largely on that false intelligence. And 4,486 U.S. troops, 318 allies and untold thousands of Iraqis died in the ensuing conflict.

We went to war with Iraq because the Bush administration wanted to go to war with Iraq. Not because the CIA wanted to go to war with Iraq.
 
We went to war with Iraq because the Bush administration wanted to go to war with Iraq. Not because the CIA wanted to go to war with Iraq.

Whatever you say.

But the CIA was wrong.
 
Bottom line, from the CIA’s point of view: Saddam used to lie about possessing WMD, so we believed he still was. Unfortunately, the U.S. went to war based largely on that false intelligence.

I knew that. Every time anyone asked pointed questions back then, that was the only excuse given. As one who still backs the original invasion, you should know that. Also, the false intelligence came from Israeli intelligence.
 
I knew that. Every time anyone asked pointed questions back then, that was the only excuse given. As one who still backs the original invasion, you should know that. Also, the false intelligence came from Israeli intelligence.

Вы говорите Russion
 
How special.

http://ntknetwork.com/kerry-throws-doubt-on-anonymous-intelligence-reports-on-russian-hacks/

Kerry Throws Doubt on Anonymous “Intelligence” Reports on Russian Hacks

On Thursday, Secretary of State John Kerry appeared before reporters to deliver a statement on the crisis in Syria. After giving his statement, a reporter asked Kerry if he had any comment on reports that Vladimir Putin ordered the Russian hacks that might have influenced the presidential election.

“Well, let me – look, I am not going to start making comments at this point. I haven’t commented on this publicly because of the job I do,” Kerry told the reporter.

“I’m not going to comment on anonymous reports from intelligence officials that are not identified that have quotes around the concept of intelligence officials,” Kerry went on to say, putting “intelligence officials” in air quotes.
 
How special.

http://ntknetwork.com/kerry-throws-doubt-on-anonymous-intelligence-reports-on-russian-hacks/

Kerry Throws Doubt on Anonymous “Intelligence” Reports on Russian Hacks

On Thursday, Secretary of State John Kerry appeared before reporters to deliver a statement on the crisis in Syria. After giving his statement, a reporter asked Kerry if he had any comment on reports that Vladimir Putin ordered the Russian hacks that might have influenced the presidential election.

“Well, let me – look, I am not going to start making comments at this point. I haven’t commented on this publicly because of the job I do,” Kerry told the reporter.

“I’m not going to comment on anonymous reports from intelligence officials that are not identified that have quotes around the concept of intelligence officials,” Kerry went on to say, putting “intelligence officials” in air quotes.
You realize that all you've done in quoting from the actual article is reveal how misleading the title is, right?
 
If the Russian did the deed, how brilliant are they for telling us what HRC actually did?
Seriously though, I don't know why in the hell the Democrats are doing all this hand wringing in public, with expressions of being violated. Makes them seem like weenies for sure.
 
If the Russian did the deed, how brilliant are they for telling us what HRC actually did?
Seriously though, I don't know why in the hell the Democrats are doing all this hand wringing in public, with expressions of being violated. Makes them seem like weenies for sure.
When I was 14 my little brother stole my porn stash. If I were these weenies I'd have run straight to my mom crying.
 
If you really believe that Russia did this shit, you should advocate going to war over this then. There's no other answer. Diplomacy won't work in this situation.
 
Even Trump requested the russian hackers leak more stuff.



So, even he really thinks that Russia was behind it.
 
Even Trump requested the russian hackers leak more stuff.



So, even he really thinks that Russia was behind it.


Sharing with the FBI is "leaking more stuff"? He isn't saying Russia was behind it either. Might want to actually read his tweet.
 
Sharing with the FBI is "leaking more stuff"? He isn't saying Russia was behind it either. Might want to actually read his tweet.
Ok. Sorry I read too much into his awkward tweet. I mean he tweeted it right after Russia was named as the DNC leak. So, I think everyone knew what he was saying. Weird that he would be asking for the Russians help. I wonder where he got that idea.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top