CIA: Russia influenced the election

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Rastapopoulos said:
Oh, that settles it then.
Click to expand...

It is on you to prove it. And you didn't, even with the link you provided.

They don't give an example of a single email that was forged or modified. That a hacker might go through the emails and start sorting them into folders like "pay to play" doesn't make the emails themselves bogus. And it's completely believable there was a pay to play folder - it's Clinton, you know.
 
Sedatedfork said:
What's most important though is not conflicts of interest, taxes, Russia, a concrete plan of Trump to replace ACA, or crazies in the Trump cabinet. What the people really want to know is what Donald Trump thinks of Meryl Streep and SNL. These are the pressing issues of the day.
Click to expand...
 
Rastapopoulos said:
Click to expand...


Wow, yeah wouldn't want people of influence to open their mouths and voice their opinions.

What's trump going to do, round up all the actresses and actors who don't support him and put them in an internment camp?
 
iStock_000001989323XSmall.jpg


http://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/7-signs-youre-an-angry-person/6/

7 Signs You're an Angry Person
 
Denny Crane said:
7 Signs You're an Angry Person
Click to expand...


Being a Complainer
People who spend a lot of time complaining about the transgressions and shortcomings of other people may have an anger "problem," says Dr. Williams.

Some angry people rant about politics
Click to expand...

Sound like anyone we know?
 
Denny Crane said:
He said we've been hacked by all sorts of people, including Russia. He didn't say the Russians were involved in the hacks or releases through WikiLeaks.

I think he's trying to be nice to the Intel community.
Click to expand...

I work in the Gov. We are hacked into (or tried) every day. These people are breaking it down for the every-day-idiot. Mostly the point is, they don't have proof Russia released that information, they are just going on previous hacks during the last couple of years and attributing that to this. It's child's play to them to do this.
 
Rastapopoulos said:
Yeah, because the people of Chile just laughed and said "You guys!" when the CIA replaced Allende with Pinochet. So we should take successful Russian manipulation in the same good spirit.

(Incidentally, good timing on putting the word "flush" in there.)
Click to expand...

We're not Chile and the FSB ain't the CIA.
 
I try to do my part to keep Denny's post count constantly moving forward....it's the least I can do
 
blue32 said:
Internal spying.
Click to expand...


See its crap like this that makes me not care what ANYONE says anymore because EVERYONE talks without investigation to confirm their statements.

How can this person tell she is taking a picture vs reading or responding to a text or simply reading a headline?

I could not tell the difference and further more it didn't look like she moved her hand around to try to center anything into a picture.

This is the type of crap that if I were an Angry person I would be fighting tooth and nail against, but im not an angry person, just a disappointed person. So I just ignore it all and when the sky falls the sky falls. I wont get accurate info when it does because too many people do this kind of stuff.

Csan't trust anything you read online so why spend so much of one's time worrying about it and spend all day re posting and arguing about it?

None of us knows whats accurate and whats not.....
 
Orion Bailey said:
See its crap like this that makes me not care what ANYONE says anymore because EVERYONE talks without investigation to confirm their statements.

How can this person tell she is taking a picture vs reading or responding to a text or simply reading a headline?

I could not tell the difference and further more it didn't look like she moved her hand around to try to center anything into a picture.

This is the type of crap that if I were an Angry person I would be fighting tooth and nail against, but im not an angry person, just a disappointed person. So I just ignore it all and when the sky falls the sky falls. I wont get accurate info when it does because too many people do this kind of stuff.

Csan't trust anything you read online so why spend so much of one's time worrying about it and spend all day re posting and arguing about it?

None of us knows whats accurate and whats not.....
Click to expand...

I guess we'll find out sooner or later if she did or did not. Looks pretty evident to me what she's doing. She even scans the room with her eyes first.
 
blue32 said:
I guess we'll find out sooner or later if she did or did not. Looks pretty evident to me what she's doing. She even scans the room with her eyes first.
Click to expand...
I didnt see her scan the roiom. I saw her look to one side for a moment, but the room is emptying. lots of activity and lots of things that can catch the eye. Furthermore, d oyou see the angle of the camera vs the doc on the table? You really think someone is goign to be ableto read the doc from a picture taken at that angle?

Here is a pic I just took attempting to get the same angle on a manual. Can you read it?
IMG_0595.JPG

That was probably closer to this than she was to hers and when I grab the pic on my phone to expand as large as possible, I can still only read the headline. I am just saying if she was taking pics of the doc for actual info, she would more than likely need a much better picture than the one she was taking IF she was taking one.
 
Orion Bailey said:
I didnt see her scan the roiom. I saw her look to one side for a moment, but the room is emptying. lots of activity and lots of things that can catch the eye. Furthermore, d oyou see the angle of the camera vs the doc on the table? You really think someone is goign to be ableto read the doc from a picture taken at that angle?

Here is a pic I just took attempting to get the same angle on a manual. Can you read it?
View attachment 11831

That was probably closer to this than she was to hers and when I grab the pic on my phone to expand as large as possible, I can still only read the headline. I am just saying if she was taking pics of the doc for actual info, she would more than likely need a much better picture than the one she was taking IF she was taking one.
Click to expand...

Your attachment was made low res by the software. If she has a modern phone, the image would be 4K and zooming in on the text would absolutely make it readable.
 
Denny Crane said:
Your attachment was made low res by the software. If she has a modern phone, the image would be 4K and zooming in on the text would absolutely make it readable.
Click to expand...
I had a used door that I checked over and it looked perfect. The paint shop said it had a scratch in it. I had a picture of when I fit the door.

Not believing that they didn't scratch it I went back and zoomed in and sure as shit, scratch. I can't even upload it because it is too big.
 
I had to text it to myself to reduce the size, scratch is about two inches in front and six inches below silver door handleimage000000_02.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

truebluefan
FBI obtained FISA warrant to monitor former Trump adviser Carter Page
Replies
0
Views
238
truebluefan
truebluefan
Further
Politics Russia 'hacked' 21 US states in election
3 4 5
Replies
139
Views
9K
Further
Further
SlyPokerDog
OT New Report Says Dutch Have Absolute Proof Russia Was Behind 2016 Election Hacking
2
Replies
31
Views
1K
barfo
barfo
Denny Crane
Politics Trump administration sanctions Russian spies, trolls over U.S. election interference, cyber attacks
Replies
3
Views
276
CupWizier
CupWizier
MARIS61
Politics CIA, FBI, Obama WH and Dem officials exposed rigging probe
4 5 6
Replies
156
Views
13K
yankeesince59
yankeesince59

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top