CIA: Russia influenced the election

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

HAHAHAHAHAHA

Couldn't happen to a more biased crew.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...headquarters-generate-significant-rental-reve

New York Times Will Vacate 8 Floors In Its HQ To Generate "Significant Rental Revenue"

Remember when The NYT reported that its ad hoc campaign to boost revenue by selling subscriptions in response to the vicious back and forth with Donald Trump, was said to be a smashing success? Perhaps it was subscriptions for the crossword puzzle because it appears the monetary success was not smashing enough, and according to a just released note from executives Arthur Sulzberger and Mark Thompson, the newspaper will vacate at least eight floors in its iconic building, allowing it to "generate significant rental income" because it is "frankly, too expensive to occupy this many floors when we don’t truly need them."

Maybe the lesson here is that when the newspaper business model no longer works, one can just pivot into a REIT?

The remaining staff will be consolidated on the remaining, redesigned floors in a "more dynamic, modern and open workplace, one that is better suited to the moment."

Furthermore, the NYT publisher and CEO will lose their corner offices, which they call a "vestige from a different era" and will "introduce more team rooms and common spaces."

It is unclear if NYT would distribute pink slips as part of the cost-cutting effort, however as the letter adds, "in the end, these changes will impact every employee at 620 Eighth Ave. In the near term, we will have to move about 400 employees out of the building to nearby office space while the first phase of work is completed. We expect that group, which includes parts of marketing, technology, the newsroom, news services, corporate finance and print products and services pre-press operations, to move in the first quarter and return by the end of 2017. Your manager will notify you if your position is affected by this temporary move. We understand and appreciate the disruption this will inevitably cause and we will do everything in our power to mitigate it."
 
Did you hear? The freaked out left in Britain are blaming the Russians for hacking Brexit! The desperation is probably the most entertained I've been in a long while! SAD
 
That was after he double downed and then said he was joking or at least. Gingrich did and then maybe Trump did too after Gingrich told him to say he was joking. Did Russia know he was joking?
 
That was after he double downed and then said he was joking or at least. Gingrich did and then maybe Trump did too after Gingrich told him to say he was joking. Did Russia know he was joking?
When first mentioned, he had a smug face. It's really laughable that people still don't understand how easily Trump had the press like puddy in his hands. A lot of them are actually paid to be observant and failed miserably.
 
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...-americans-believe-russian-hacking-didnt-sway

Poll: Majority of Americans believe Russian hacking didn't sway election

The majority of American voters believe Russian interference with the 2016 presidential election had no influence on its outcome, according to a new poll by Fox News.

Fifty-nine percent of all voters polled by Fox News said they don’t think Russian hacking made a difference in the election, while 32 percent believe Moscow helped President-elect Donald Trump win.

Opinions were split along partisan lines, with 82 percent of Republicans, 64 percent of independents and 36 percent of Democrats saying Russia’s interference had no impact.

A secret CIA assessment concluded Russia hacking was intended to sway the election in Trump’s favor.
 
36% of democrats aren't losers.

b7745bed2f5ea1c086b9a66b2ca2ec2d.jpg
 
I thought it was ridiculous when Martin Sheen and the Hollywood snowflakes made the elector videos but they actually made them calling the electors by name.
 
A new Qualtrics survey shows a large fraction of Republicans — 52% — said Trump won the popular vote, compared with only 7% of Democrats and 24% of independents. Among Republicans without any college education, the share was even larger: 60%, compared with 37% of Republicans with a college degree.

barfo
 
A new Qualtrics survey shows a large fraction of Republicans — 52% — said Trump won the popular vote, compared with only 7% of Democrats and 24% of independents. Among Republicans without any college education, the share was even larger: 60%, compared with 37% of Republicans with a college degree.

barfo

Among democrats, many think Clinton won the election.
loser.jpg
 
Among democrats, many think Clinton won the election.

You sound butt hurt about the popular vote. SAD, so SAD.

Although, since you are a closeted republican, I suppose it's more than even odds that you think Trump won the popular vote. Also SAD.

barfo
 

Do I talk about republicans as though I like them?

I may have talked up one or two. Ron Paul, of course. I think Kasich is halfway decent.

Who else?

You FAIL again.

SMH
 
Do I talk about republicans as though I like them?

No, you definitely don't. You talk about republicans as though you love them.

I may have talked up one or two. Ron Paul, of course. I think Kasich is halfway decent.

Who else?

Well, there's that orange guy. Can't remember his name, but I remember you insisting that he was nothing less than the second coming of Jesus.

barfo
 
No, you definitely don't. You talk about republicans as though you love them.



Well, there's that orange guy. Can't remember his name, but I remember you insisting that he was nothing less than the second coming of Jesus.

barfo

Name 5.

You can't.

If you think I liked Boehner, you're full of shit.

BTW, Boner is what YOU get when YOU think of Sarah Palin.

Go find a post where I said I thought he was good.

If anything, I've posted that I worry about republicans controlling all three branches. You know, I like it when congress doesn't pass laws. Any of them infringe on someone's liberty.
 
Name 5.

You can't.

If you think I liked Boehner, you're full of shit.

BTW, Boner is what YOU get when YOU think of Sarah Palin.

Go find a post where I said I thought he was good.

If anything, I've posted that I worry about republicans controlling all three branches. You know, I like it when congress doesn't pass laws. Any of them infringe on someone's liberty.

Sorry, I wasn't trying to confuse you. Orange guy == Trump. I forgot that Boehner was also orange. Guess the O in GOP stands for Orange.

barfo
 


It's funny cuz... well, I'm kind of hoping THEY think it's funny. I'm sure Putin thinks it's fucking hilarious.
 
I guess DNC stands for LOSER.
A reminder again, that you voted for a guy who got about 60 million fewer votes than Clinton. But just as you ditched the Chicago Bulls simply because the Blazers' forum was the only one that has people posting in it, you're happy to bandwagon on the Trump train.
 
A reminder again, that you voted for a guy who got about 60 million fewer votes than Clinton. But just as you ditched the Chicago Bulls simply because the Blazers' forum was the only one that has people posting in it, you're happy to bandwagon on the Trump train.

I'm happy Trump is already making deals that mean jobs.

I'll be happier to see democrats continue to lose elections. Seen enough of their damage.
 
I thought you wanted gridlock. When will you make up your mind?

I do want gridlock.

I don't want democrats to win elections.

There's nothing contradictory about those two statements.

Ron Paul, a republican, was nicknamed Dr. No because he voted no on most everything. I'll take more like him.
 
Michael Moore bribing electors is ok. But an account of an account regarding "putin" trying to influence the election is not? LOL

Democrats are playing a dangerous game trying to make this country vilify Russia; specially considering they gave Romney such a hard time about his stance on Russia back in 2012. These Dems are full of shit.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top