Politics FBI raids Martyr-Lardo

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
This is an old recycled rumor from weeks ago. The subject matter of the documents is not known to the public.

A special master is reviewing the documents. The fbi wouldn't even be allowed to read such a document.
 
beast crnjo said:
This is an old recycled rumor from weeks ago. The subject matter of the documents is not known to the public.

A special master is reviewing the documents. The fbi wouldn't even be allowed to read such a document.
Click to expand...
It was in Trump's unsecured office. Anybody could read it.
 
Phatguysrule said:
This stance is not constitutional. It violates the 1st amendment, the 4th Amendment, the 5th amendment, and very obviously the 14th amendment.

This stance is bad for society. It causes increased crime, increased violence, increased suffering, decreased economic productivity, and reduced overall health.

This stance is not logical.
Click to expand...

That's certainly your opinion. And I have mine based on my beliefs.
 
The judge ordered that the fbi nor doj is allowed to read the documents. So any rumors of the contents is very suspect.
 
Also Trump knows what he had, and Trump is leaky as they come.

barfo
 
ABM said:
That's certainly your opinion. And I have mine based on my beliefs.
Click to expand...
It's not my opinion. It's proven fact.

Our beliefs are irrelevant to the the point, other than to point out that these specific beliefs have been counterproductive and damaging to every society who has ever tried to push them off on others by force of law.
 
Phatguysrule said:
It's not my opinion. It's proven fact.

Our beliefs are irrelevant to the the point, other than to point out that these specific beliefs have been counterproductive and damaging to every society who has ever tried to push them off on others by force of law.
Click to expand...

Nonetheless, they're still my beliefs and not irrelevant to me in any way.
 
Phatguysrule said:
That doesn't make them any more logical or any less harmful.
Click to expand...

Never said it did. As I mentioned, you're entitled to your opinion, worldview, logic, etc.
 
ABM said:
Never said it did. As I mentioned, you're entitled to your opinion, worldview, logic, etc.
Click to expand...
Right. And you publicly supporting proven harmful policy is why people are aggressive toward you.

It's important that you understand that.
 
kug1pLJ.png
 
Chris Craig said:
He's screwed.

Though his judge is saving him as much as she can.
Click to expand...

It seems, based on the videos of lawyers on youtube (albeit, consider the source) that she's doing a horrible job "saving" him, and is being outclassed by Garland at each and every step of the way.
 
julius said:
It seems, based on the videos of lawyers on youtube (albeit, consider the source) that she's doing a horrible job "saving" him, and is being outclassed by Garland at each and every step of the way.
Click to expand...

Well, she has delayed him being charged thus far.
 
julius said:
It's debatable that she provided any resistance to him being charged.
Click to expand...

You can debate it sure, but he is not charged yet and won't be for months at least if the judge has her way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Featured content

Back
Top