Game Thread GAME# 67: BLAZERS @ SPURS - MARCH 15, 2017 - WEDNSDAY, 5:00 PM (PST), ESPN & KGW (1 Viewer)

[THE HCP]

This guy is comparing the loss of Meyers to that of CP3 and Blake Griffin?

 

[Trackjack]

That pretty funny if he thinks that wow.

 

[Strenuus]

Clippers had injuries, yes, but so did we. Meyers was out for the whole series and Meyers is a PTPer in the playoffs throughout his career.

You mean, a whopping 4.3 PPG in 9 games? 7.8 at it's peak? 12 minutes a game and he's...

I don't need to go on any further.

 

[Boob-No-More]

Clippers had injuries, yes, but so did we. Meyers was out for the whole series and Meyers is a PTPer in the playoffs throughout his career.

Them losing CP3 and Blake Griffin in Game 4 would have been like POR losing Lillard and Aldridge in Game 4 of the HOU series.

Us being without Meyers for the LAC series was like HOU being without Motiejunas (which they were) when we beat them.

So, what you're really saying is we wouldn't have beaten HOU if Donatas Motiejunas would have been healthy.

BNM

 

[Orion Bailey]

I had to watch it again to make sure it was real and we actually won!

 

[Mediocre Man]

Clippers had injuries, yes, but so did we. Meyers was out for the whole series and Meyers is a PTPer in the playoffs throughout his career.

This is over the top for even you, Eric

 

[Mediocre Man]

Oh come on...
come on now...
I mean... just...

Its a troll post

 

[Mediocre Man]

What makes this win random? And if it is, why isn't every win random?

Sure, they were missing Parker, but have been missing him for a while and winning without him. They were playing to win on their home floor and we flat out beat them - no excuses.

That doesn't mean we will beat them in a series, but I don't understand why you feel the need to diminish this win. Do the guys on the team know you dismiss it as a random occurrence when they play well? If so, how do they feel about that?

BNM

It seems to me he's just responding to the fans tgat are now convinced we could beat them in the playoffs because we won this game.

Does this also mean we'd lose to NOP in the playoffs cause we lost a game to them?

 

[Orion Bailey]

It seems to me he's just responding to the fans tgat are now convinced we could beat them in the playoffs because we won this game.

Does this also mean we'd lose to NOP in the playoffs cause we lost a game to them?

Veyr well could be true.

OI tell ya, the NOP team scares me for long term future. If DMC signs with them, they will be a contender during our prime.

If they can figure it out, surround those two guys with 3&D players, they will eclipse the GSW's and SA's as the big power in the west.

 

[KingSpeed]

You mean, a whopping 4.3 PPG in 9 games? 7.8 at it's peak? 12 minutes a game and he's...

I don't need to go on any further.

He shoots over 70% from three all time in the playoffs.

 

[KingSpeed]

Veyr well could be true.

OI tell ya, the NOP team scares me for long term future. If DMC signs with them, they will be a contender during our prime.

If they can figure it out, surround those two guys with 3&D players, they will eclipse the GSW's and SA's as the big power in the west.

No they won't. The two big men are redundant. It's Washington Bullets Howard/Webber all over again. They play best when one of them is sitting.

 

[Orion Bailey]

No they won't. The two big men are redundant. It's Washington Bullets Howard/Webber all over again. They play best when one of them is sitting.

Wait. YOU mean Juwan Howard? You are actually comparing him to AD?

 

[Strenuus]

He shoots over 70% from three all time in the playoffs.

Wow. 13 shots. Good for him.


He'll never be more important than CP3 or Griffin. Even people who DON'T watch basketball know that. Get off that horse. You'll never lead it to water. And ain't no one drinking that Willamette-dirty-ass water, anyway.