- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 127,303
- Likes
- 147,811
- Points
- 115
Did she suddenly start driving her car towards other cops? Show me that picture.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And your point is what, two wrongs make a right? Criminal behavior should be tolerated because free speech?
barfo
Did she suddenly start driving her car towards other cops? Show me that picture.
IDENTICAL.Not even close to the same thing but it's cute that you think it is.
She must have refused to obey the police.
Protesters in Chicago weren't occupying a small town's wildlife refuge armed to the teeth and threatening to shoot cops from what I rememberWithout civil disobedience, the civil rights movement would have been stopped in its tracks in the 1950s.
In 1968, anti government protesters flocked to Chicago to picket the Democratic Convention and took physical beatings from the cops, refusing to obey their orders.
Some people are willing to martyr themselves for the cause. Witness the Freedom Riders.
It is civil disobedience.
Being in a car full of guns and suddenly driving towards the cops isn't civil disobedience.
Protesters in Chicago weren't occupying a small town's wildlife refuge armed to the teeth and threatening to shoot cops from what I remember
There was a car full of guns? I think you made that up.
These guys protested the government's actions regarding land rights for several years without anyone getting killed. They occupied an empty government building in the middle of nowhere.
you didn't listen to their podcast? An armed militia is different from protesting at a convention with signsWhen did they threaten to shoot cops?
Protesters in Chicago weren't occupying a small town's wildlife refuge armed to the teeth and threatening to shoot cops from what I remember
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ed-for-his-waistband-just-before-he-was-shot/Did you listen to the video? At least 3 of them in the car had guns.
The news coverage of this whole thing has been abysmal. I don't not know much if anything about what the grievance is these guys are protesting.
Instead of giving us the story, the news reporters have taken a short cut and assumed these guys are whackos, Misusing the word Militia as a synonym for whacko or an adjective to whacko.
Perhaps these people are confused as to what rights they have, but we sure as hell don't know what the issue is from the lazy assed reports we read. It is also amusing to see so many manipulated by the use of the word Militia!!! How the hell did my countryman get this way?
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/03/u...prison-angering-far-right-activists.html?_r=0
Mr. Bundy described the federal building as “the people’s facility, owned by the people” and said his group was occupying it to take “a hard stand against this overreach, this taking of the people’s land and resources.”
He said the group would remain there indefinitely and told an interviewer that he hoped more supporters would join them. “We have a facility that we can house them in,” he said, referring to the occupied building.
“We pose no threat to anybody,” Mr. Bundy said. “There is no person that is physically harmed by what we are doing.” He added that if law enforcement officials “bring physical harm to us, they will be doing it only for a facility or a building.”
The only recent use of the word is by whackos that self-describe as militias
Do you have a link to such usage?
Do you have a link to such usage?

by whackos that self-describe as militias
you keep trying to romanticize these guys by comparing them to historical activists....when in fact, they are just whackoshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-establishment
Individuals who were anti-establishment often spoke of "fighting the man", "selling out to the Establishment", and "tearing down the Establishment." Many well renowned activists and activist groups innovated great changes to society by standing up to "the Establishment", including the Grateful Dead, Symbionese Liberation Army, Black Panther Party, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, Malvina Reynolds, Howard Zinn, Noam Chomsky, Public Enemy, John Lennon, K-Rino, Immortal Technique, Anti-Flag, Rage Against the Machine, Terminator X, Gil-Scott Heron, dead prez, Timothy Leary, Paris, Lupe Fiasco among others.
The "Establishment" to these, and these anti-establishment activists was not simply the people of the older generation. Dictionary.com defines the establishment as "the existing power structure in society; the dominant groups in society and their customs or institutions; institutional authority",[7] Merriam-Webster defines the words as "a group of social, economic, and political leaders who form a ruling class"[8] and The Free Dictionary defines it as "A group of people holding most of the power and influence in a government or society."[9]
Do you have a link to this self-describing?
you keep trying to romanticize these guys by comparing them to historical activists....when in fact, they are just whackos
I listened to their live chat...they're whackos..if they want to be activists, they should be in Washington DC protesting and leave this small rural community in peace. If they want to appeal a jail sentence...they should be in court. I disagree with the way they are doing this and I have not followed their decades long cause so I can't comment on that.They're clearly activists. They've been acting out against government land policies for decades. That is, by definition, a cause.
Is there an echo in here?
barfo
