THE HCP
NorthEastPortland'sFinest
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 72,482
- Likes
- 61,506
- Points
- 113
God damn......this post is AMAZING!!!!!!Why can't he see this post?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
God damn......this post is AMAZING!!!!!!Why can't he see this post?
We get to hire our own umpire?
Up to $1.5M? So like 3 dollars per adult at most? No complaints here. Dont think that'll be an obstacle. That's better than most cities.And this is why it probably wont happen. Too many small town thinking people in Portland to pay taxes for it
The 1.5M is money the PDP will pay to PoP during the initial 2-year negotiating window. At this point, there are no plans for any public money to be used.Up to $1.5M? So like 3 dollars per adult at most? No complaints here. Dont think that'll be an obstacle. That's better than most cities.
Too many people will bitch about the money going to less fortunate. Read the few comments from the article. It's going to be an issueUp to $1.5M? So like 3 dollars per adult at most? No complaints here. Dont think that'll be an obstacle. That's better than most cities.
Too many people will bitch about the money going to less fortunate. Read the few comments from the article. It's going to be an issue
I hope you're rightUsually the fans who comment on stuff like this are some of the most uniformed people involved. Hell, look at the comments on articles about the Blazers, they tend to be full of people who don't even have a elementary grasp on facts.
I hope you're right
As has been mentioned previously, it's not the property, the structure itself, or the surrounding development that will require significant cooperation from the city and/or public funding. It's the infrastructure improvements necessary to accommodate a stadium and a team that will be the issue. Increased traffic access, likely another bridge, expanded lightrail, etc...no way an MLB team can succeed in that location without those improvements, and those are the things that the non-baseball-loving public is going to bristle about money being spent on.
I'm talking more about people who are indifferent to sports rather than those who openly oppose them. People who couldn't care less about baseball one way or the other begin to care (negatively) once the city has to outlay tens of millions of dollars for infrastructure improvements "solely" to support stadium development.Well. I would expect people who don't like a sport to object to any public funds of any kind used to benefit it. But they woud probably bristle if you merely traded baseball cards as a kid. Or that you liked the sport in general.... because that would just give them another opportunity to tell you how much they hate it.
I'm talking more about people who are indifferent to sports rather than those who openly oppose them. People who couldn't care less about baseball one way or the other begin to care (negatively) once the city has to outlay tens of millions of dollars for infrastructure improvements "solely" to support stadium development.
The city spent 31 million dollars upgrading Providence Park when the Timbers became an MLS club. And I don't renember people picketing City Hall.
They would have, but nobody knew about it because nobody pays attention to soccer.
(I kid, FAMS, I kid. Well, sort of...)
Is true. Can confirm. You're all idiots for liking such a stupid sport.Or that you liked the sport in general.... because that would just give them another opportunity to tell you how much they hate it.
Is true. Can confirm. You're all idiots for liking such a stupid sport.
![]()
... to mean "why don't they fix the cracks in this gol durn sidewalk!"
barfo
As has been mentioned previously, it's not the property, the structure itself, or the surrounding development that will require significant cooperation from the city and/or public funding. It's the infrastructure improvements necessary to accommodate a stadium and a team that will be the issue. Increased traffic access, likely another bridge, expanded lightrail, etc...no way an MLB team can succeed in that location without those improvements, and those are the things that the non-baseball-loving public is going to bristle about money being spent on.
I believe Paulson footed some of that bill. At the very least that money came from bonds paid back by ticket taxes. I remember hearing Paulson say they paid the city back in record time, way ahead of schedule.The city spent 31 million dollars upgrading Providence Park when the Timbers became an MLS club. And I don't renember people picketing City Hall.
I hear expansions not until 2025. Thats a ways out!I like how this guy, who I've never heard of, seems to know more about the prospects of expansion (which the commissioner of MLB has pretty much said is on the table after they settle Tampa Bay and Oakland) than the people who are actually in the know.
I'm fine with waiting as long as we are getting a team. It gives everyone plenty of time to make everything perfect when building the stadium and developing the area around it.I hear expansions not until 2025. Thats a ways out!
I'd think a team relocating may happen sooner?
They would have, but nobody knew about it because nobody pays attention to soccer.
(I kid, FAMS, I kid. Well, sort of...)